Objectives
This observational, cross-sectional, pilot study was conducted to establish a nutritional profile among experienced climbers, both non-elite and elite, and to evaluate factors that influence time to exhaustion while climbing to volitional failure.
Methods
Elite (n = 10) and non-elite (n = 5) climbers, aged 18–45 years participated in the following: (1) nutritional analysis - 3-day food record and 24-hour dietary recall were analyzed using Food Processor and compared to government daily recommended intake; (2) climbing trial - after completing a climbing-related questionnaire and measuring anthropometric characteristics and hand grip strength, participants climbed a moderately difficult pre-set indoor route continuously until reaching volitional exhaustion.
Results
The major findings were significant differences for total climbing time between non-elite and elite climbers (t(13) = −2.6, p = 0.02). Additionally, protein intake from 24 hour recall (n = 15, rS = −0.53, p = 0.04) and total % water intake (n = 15, rS = −0.60, p = 0.02) were negatively correlated with climbing time.
Conclusions
These results indicate that a longer climbing time to exhaustion is related to self-reported climbing ability. In contrast, the negative association between protein intake and climbing time, suggest that carbohydrate intake may play a more important role in climbing performance than protein intake. In addition the negative association between total % water and climbing suggest that the more hydrated a person is going into a climb, the longer they can sustain a climb.
Funding Sources
This research was supported by Grant Award BUCSR-Y3–010 from the Bastyr University Center for Student Research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.