No abstract

Eradication of mynas from small tropical islands is feasible. The Denis Island eradication was prolonged by difficulties in management and staffing. Using volunteers, the cost of the eradication was similar to that of eradicating rodents from the island. In future eradication attempts in Seychelles, possible food stress during the drier season (May to September) might facilitate trapping at this time. Habitat management, especially the removal of short mown grass, could enhance eradication progress. Continued monitoring is needed to confirm eradication and detect any immigration, and also to record responses in the endemic birds. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry.

The consequences for wildlife of living in radiologically contaminated environments are uncertain. Previous laboratory studies suggest insects are relatively radiation-resistant; however, some field studies from the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone report severe adverse effects at substantially lower radiation dose rates than expected. Here, we present the first laboratory investigation to study how environmentally relevant radiation exposure affects bumblebee life history, assessing the shape of the relationship between radiation exposure and fitness loss. Dose rates comparable to the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (50–400 µGy h −1 ) impaired bumblebee reproduction and delayed colony growth but did not affect colony weight or longevity. Our best-fitting model for the effect of radiation dose rate on colony queen production had a strongly nonlinear concave relationship: exposure to only 100 µGy h −1 impaired reproduction by 30–45%, while further dose rate increases caused more modest additional reproductive impairment. Our data indicate that the practice of estimating effects of environmentally relevant low-dose rate exposure by extrapolating from high-dose rates may have considerably underestimated the effects of radiation. If our data can be generalized, they suggest insects suffer significant negative consequences at dose rates previously thought safe; we therefore advocate relevant revisions to the international framework for radiological protection of the environment.

Objective: To determine in vitro elution of amikacin from poloxamer 407 NF, 1% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), 3% CMC, 5% CMC, and control (sterile water). Study design: Descriptive in vitro. Sample population:Triplicate samples from each experimental group. Methods: Amikacin solution was prepared in poloxamer 407 NF, 1% CMC, 3% CMC, 5% CMC, or sterile water. Then, 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was added to each of three aliquots per base and the samples were incubated at 37 C. PBS was removed and replaced at 1,4,8,12,24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, and 240 hours and amikacin concentration was measured. Results: The highest median concentration of amikacin in the eluent of poloxamer 407 NF, 3% CMC, and 5% CMC was observed at 48 hours: 3300, 3030, and 2190 μg/ml, respectively. The highest median concentration of amikacin in the eluent of 1% CMC and sterile water were observed at 1 hour: 13300 and 15600 μg/ml, respectively. Median eluent concentration of amikacin exceeded 2000 μg/ml (the reported minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] of certain biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius) from 24 to 96 hours for poloxamer 407 NF, 24-72 hours for 3% CMC, 48-72 hours for 5% CMC, 1-4 hours for 1% CMC, and 1-4 hours for sterile water.Conclusion: Amikacin elution from tested substances reached or exceeded target MIC during the 240 hours tested.Clinical significance: Hydrogel-amikacin solutions may be useful topical treatment options for some infected wounds. In vivo safety and efficacy should be evaluated.

Communicating radiation risk is an important part of radiation protection. However, achieving effective risk communication is challenging given the negative public perception of radiation and conflicting views presented by both media and social media. Noting the importance of building capacity amongst radiation protection professionals to communicate radiation risk effectively, the Society for Radiological Protection (SRP) ran a half-day workshop at its Annual Conference on the 22nd May 2019 in Scarborough Spa, UK. A number of key factors were identified that should be considered when communicating with the public post a nuclear or radiological incident, communicating with government and local authorities, and communicating with the public as part of public outreach. The following memorandum provides a summary of the points presented and discussed. It also outlines proposed future activities of the SRP focused on further developing the communications aspect of radiation professionals' practice.