Background: To determine the optimal timing of the first Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan after curativeintent radiotherapy (RT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and evaluate the role of MRI in surveillance for locoregional recurrence (LRR). Methods: Patients with non-metastatic NPC treated radically who had at least one post-treatment MRI (ptMRI) done were included for analysis. ptMRI reports were retrospectively reviewed and categorised as complete response (CR), partial response/residual disease (PR) or indeterminate (ID). Patients with LRR were assessed to determine if initial detection was by MRI or clinical means. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed to identify independent factors associated with CR on ptMRIs. Results: Between 2013 and 2017, 262 eligible patients were analysed, all treated with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT). Median time from end of RT to the first ptMRI was 93 days (range 32-346). Of the first ptMRIs, 88 (33.2%) were CR, 133 (50.2%) ID, and 44 (16.6%) PR. A second ptMRI was done for 104 (78.2%) of 133 patients with ID status. In this group, 77 (57.9%) of the subsequent MRI were determined to be CR, 21(15.8%) remained ID and 6 (4.5%) PR. T1 tumour stage and AJCC stage I were associated with increased CR rates on first ptMRI on multivariable analysis. ID status was more likely at 75-105 days (3 months +/− 15 days) vs 106-135 days (4 months +/− 15 days) post RT (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.16-4.12, p = 0.024). LRR developed in 27 (10.1%) patients; 20 (74.1%) were initially detected through MRI, 3 (11.1%) by nasoendoscopy and 2 (7.4%) by PET-CT. Conclusion: MRI is useful for detecting local recurrence or persistent disease after curative-intent treatment. Most patients will need more than one ptMRI to arrive at a definitive status. The rate of ID ptMRI may be reduced by delaying the first scan to around 4 months post RT.
Background: To determine the optimal timing of the first Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan after curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and evaluate the role of MRI in surveillance for locoregional recurrence (LRR). Methods: Patients with non-metastatic NPC treated radically with at least one post-treatment MRI (ptMRI) were included for analysis. ptMRI reports were retrospectively reviewed and categorised as complete response (CR), partial response/residual disease (PR) or indeterminate (ID). Patients with LRR were assessed to determine if initial detection was by MRI or clinical means. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed to identify independent factors associated with CR on ptMRIs. Results: Between 2013 and 2017, 262 eligible patients were analysed, all treated with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT). Median time from end of RT to the first ptMRI was 93 days (range 32-346). Of the first ptMRIs, 88 (33.2%) were CR, 133 (50.2%) ID, and 44 (16.6%) PR. A second ptMRI was done for 104 (78.2%) of 133 patients with ID status. In this group, 77 (57.9%) of the subsequent MRI were determined to be CR, 21(15.8%) remained ID and 6 (4.5%) PR. T1 tumour stage and AJCC stage I were associated with increased CR rates on first ptMRI on multivariable analysis. ID status was more likely at 75-105 days (3 months +/- 15 days) vs 106-135 days (4 months +/- 15 days) post RT (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.16-4.12, p=0.024). LRR developed in 27 (10.1%) patients; 20 (74.1%) was initially detected through MRI, 3 (11.1%) by nasoendoscopy and 2 (7.4%) by PET-CT. Conclusion: MRI is useful for detecting local recurrence or persistent disease after curative-intent treatment. Most patients will need more than one ptMRI to arrive at a definitive status. The rate of ID ptMRI may be reduced by delaying the first scan to around 4 months post RT.
Ocular adnexal extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (OA-EMZL) and immunoglobulin G4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) may exist on a continuum. Presence of immunoglobulin light-chain restriction and clonal gene rearrangement suggests presence of lymphoma; whereas bilateral, infraorbital nerve and systemic involvement accompanied by elevated serum IgG4 levels may indicate synchronous IgG4-ROD. Although steroids have been the mainstay for the treatment of IgG4-ROD, radiotherapy (RT) has been used occasionally. The reported RT doses range between 24 and 30 Gy, which can result in acute and late toxicities. A low-dose regimen of four Gy has not been previously described. We describe a patient with bilateral OA-EMZL arising from IgG4-ROD successfully treated with low dose ‘boom-boom’ radiotherapy. In addition, we review the literature for the association between these two conditions and the role of RT in their management.
Background/Aim: To report the outcomes of patients with prostate cancer treated with dose-escalated radiotherapy over a 15-year period at our Institution. Patients and Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven cT1-4N0M0 disease who received radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) were reviewed. The endpoints were 5-year overall survival (OS), freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) and late treatment toxicities. Results: A total of 236 patients were eligible. Median follow-up was 70 months. Low-, intermediate-and high-risk disease was found in 9%; 29% and 62% of patients, respectively. The median radiation dose was 73.8 Gy. Overall 42% of patients had dose escalation to >74 Gy. Five-year OS and FFBF were 95.2%/81.6%/75.4% and 95.0%/98.0%/82.0% for low-/intermediate-/high-risk patients, respectively. Dose escalation to >74 Gy did not improve FFBF (hazard ratio=0.97, 95% confidence intervaI=0.43-2.19, p=0.93) and was associated with a 4.3-fold increase in the odds of grade 3 or more rectal bleeding (p<0.01). Conclusion: Dose escalation to >74 Gy did not improve OS or FFBF but was associated with a higher rate of grade 3 or more rectal haemorrhage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.