No abstract

Introduction: Emerging evidence suggests that Chemotherapy (CT) treated breast cancer survivors (BCS) who have “risk variants” in genes may be more susceptible to cognitive impairment (CI) and/or poor cardiac phenotypes. The objective of this preliminary study was to examine whether there is a relationship between genetic variants and objective/subjective cognitive or cardiac phenotypes. Methods and Analysis: BCS were recruited from Moffitt Cancer Center, Morsani College of Medicine, AdventHealth Tampa and Sarasota Memorial Hospital. Genomic DNA were collected at baseline for genotyping analysis. A total of 16 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 14 genes involved in cognitive or cardiac function were evaluated. Three genetic models (additive, dominant, and recessive) were used to test correlation coefficients between genetic variants and objective/subjective measures of cognitive functioning and cardiac outcomes (heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, respiration rate, and oxygen saturation). Results: BCS (207 participants) with a mean age of 56 enrolled in this study. The majority were non-Hispanic white (73.7%), married (63.1%), and received both CT and radiation treatment (77.3%). Three SNPs in genes related to cognitive functioning (rs429358 in APOE, rs1800497 in ANKK1, rs10119 in TOMM40) emerged with the most consistent significant relationship with cognitive outcomes. Among five candidate SNPs related to cardiac functioning, rs8055236 in CDH13 and rs1801133 in MTHER emerged with potential significant relationships with cardiac phenotype. Conclusions: These preliminary results provide initial targets to further examine whether BCS with specific genetic profiles may preferentially benefit from interventions designed to improve cognitive and cardiac functioning following CT.

Objectives:The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the state of the scientific evidence related to educational programs for post-treatment breast cancer survivors (BCSs) during the last twenty years. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases from January 2000 through May 2020 included keywords related to research on educational programs for BCSs. Inclusion criteria included: (1) focus on an educational program for post-treatment breast cancer survivors; (2) original research; (3) peer-review journals; (4) English language; and ( 5) published between January 2000 to May 2020. EndNote X9 (software version: X9, manufacturer: Clarivate, website location: endnote.com) was used as the reference management software package to manage citations from search results. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) flowchart of the selection process is presented in this paper. Results: A total of 24 educational programs/interventions research studies include one mixed-method study, three qualitative studies, and twenty quantitative studies, were identified and analyzed. Three programs focused on BCSs' self-management and self-efficacy, two programs focused on BCSs' cognitive problems, seven programs focused on BCSs' psychological distress, emotional support, and information seeking. In addition, one program focused on BCSs' body image, body function, and sexual dysfunction issues, five programs focused on BCSs' physical activities, nutritional levels, and normal body weight maintenance, two programs focused on BCSs' supportive care and peer advocate support. Finally, one program focused on BCSs' palliative care and end of life care, and three programs focused on BCSs' post-treatment symptom clusters and overall quality of life. Conclusions: After breast cancer treatment ends, BCSs continue to suffer from long-term physical and psychological symptoms and report multiple unmet needs. Research on post-treatment breast cancer educational programs showed that programs assist BCSs with post-treatment symptom management and address their concerns while promoting supportive care and peer support to improve BCS's overall quality of life.

Objectives: The major aims of this integrative review were to identify: 1) specific cognitive domains affected by chemotherapy; 2) predictors of cognitive dysfunction related to chemotherapy; 3) reported underlying mechanisms of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction, and 4) clinical and research implications of chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) among breast cancer survivors. Methods: A computerized search of published research articles through the health journal databases of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed by using the keywords "chemotherapy," "cognitive dysfunction," "cognitive impairment," "cognitive decline," "breast cancer," and "breast carcinoma." References were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: After screening the titles and abstracts of 639 articles, 20 research studies were identified that focused on chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer for the final analysis. The 20 studies included: one longitudinal study, eleven prospective studies, two casecontrol studies, two retrospective studies, and four cross-sectional studies. The analysis of these 20 research studies contributed new knowledge about cognitive domains being affected by chemotherapy, risk factors for CRCD and underlying mechanisms of CRCD. Conclusion: This systematic review indicates significant clinical implications of early assessment and early interventions for CRCD to assist breast cancer survivors.