Cationic peptide sequences, whether linear, branched, or dendritic, are widely used to condense and protect DNA in both polyplex and lipopolyplex gene delivery vectors. How these peptides behave within these particles and the consequences this has on transfection efficiency remain poorly understood. We have compared, in parallel, a complete series of cationic peptides, both branched and linear, coformulated with plasmid DNA to give polyplexes, or with plasmid DNA and the cationic lipid, DOTMA, mixed with 50% of the neutral helper lipid, DOPE, to give lipopolyplexes, and correlated the transfection efficiencies of these complexes to their biophysical properties. Lipopolyplexes formulated from branched Arg-rich peptides, or linear Lys-rich peptides, show the best transfection efficiencies in an alveolar epithelial cell line, with His-rich peptides being relatively ineffective. The majority of the biophysical studies (circular dichroism, dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, small angle neutron scattering, and gel band shift assay) indicated that all of the formulations were similar in size, surface charge, and lipid bilayer structure, and longer cationic sequences, in general, gave better transfection efficiencies. Whereas lipopolyplexes formulated from branched Arg-containing peptides were more effective than those formulated from linear Arg-containing sequences, the reverse was true for Lys-containing sequences, which may be related to differences in DNA condensation between Arg-rich and Lys-rich peptides observed in the CD studies.

Convection enhanced delivery (CED) is a method of direct injection to the brain that can achieve widespread dispersal of therapeutics, including gene therapies, from a single dose. Non-viral, nanocomplexes are of interest as vectors for gene therapy in the brain, but it is essential that administration should achieve maximal dispersal to minimise the number of injections required. We hypothesised that anionic nanocomplexes administered by CED should disperse more widely in rat brains than cationics of similar size, which bind electrostatically to cell-surface anionic moieties such as proteoglycans, limiting their spread. Anionic, receptor-targeted nanocomplexes (RTN) containing a neurotensin-targeting peptide were prepared with plasmid DNA and compared with cationic RTNs for dispersal and transfection efficiency. Both RTNs were labelled with gadolinium for localisation in the brain by MRI and in brain sections by LA-ICP-MS, as well as with rhodamine fluorophore for detection by fluorescence microscopy. MRI distribution studies confirmed that the anionic RTNs dispersed more widely than cationic RTNs, particularly in the corpus callosum. Gene expression levels from anionic formulations were similar to those of cationic RTNs. Thus, anionic RTN formulations can achieve both widespread dispersal and effective gene expression in brains after administration of a single dose by CED.

Nanoparticulate systems in various unique configurations are highly effective at detecting protease activity both in vivo and in vitro. In this article, we have summarised the conventional modern methods for monitoring protease activity, and critically appraised recent advances in protease-responsive nanosensors.

Clickable biocompatible nanoparticles were prepared in a one-pot process by microemulsion polymerization using acrylamide, N,N'-methylene bisacrylamide and either N-(11-azido-3,6,9-trioxaundecanyl)acrylamide or N-propargylacrylamide, which were then readily modified by CuAAC reaction to afford sensing nanomaterials.

The structure, biophysical properties and biological behavior of lipopolyplex ternary gene delivery vectors incorporating novel C14 glycerol based lipids of varying alkyl chain geometry (containing cis, trans or alkyne double bonds) have been studied in the presence and absence of a bifunctional targeting peptide designed to both condense DNA and confer integrin-specific targeting. In vitro transfection studies in breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells revealed that ternary formulations of lipid:peptide:DNA (LPD) complexes prepared using the aforementioned lipids possessed highly synergistic transfection activity up to 2500-fold higher than their respective lipid:DNA (LD) or peptide:DNA (PD) counterparts. Furthermore, the small structural differences in the lipid alkyl chain geometries also resulted in pronounced differences in transfection within each type of formulation, whereby the trans lipids showed best activity when formulated as LD complexes, whereas the cis lipids were superior in LPD formulations. Confocal fluorescence internalization studies using labeled components of the formulations showed both the lipid and the DNA of LD complexes to be trapped in endocytic compartments, whereas in the case of LPD complexes, the DNA was clearly released from the endosomal compartments and, together with the peptide, internalized within the cell nucleus. Physicochemical characterization of the formulations carried out by light and neutron scattering, zeta potential measurement, and negative staining electron microscopy detected major structural differences between LD and LPD complexes. Gel electrophoresis assays additionally showed differences between the individual lipids tested in each type of formulation. In conclusion, the superior transfection of the trans lipids in the LD complexes was thought to be attributed to superior DNA binding caused by a more closely matched charge distribution of the more rigid, trans lipids with the DNA. In the case of the LPD complexes, the DNA was thought to be predominantly condensed by the cationic portion of the peptide forming a central core surrounded by a lipid bilayer from which the targeting sequence partially protrudes. The more fluid, cis lipids were thought to confer better activity in this formulation due to allowing more of the targeting peptide sequence to protrude.