Posttransplant erythrocytosis (PTE) is defined as a persistently elevated hematocrit to a level greater than 51% after renal transplantation. It occurs in 10% to 15% of graft recipients and usually develops 8 to 24 months after engraftment. Spontaneous remission of established PTE is observed in one fourth of the patients within 2 years from onset, whereas in the remaining three fourths it persists for several years, only to remit after loss of renal function from rejection. Predisposing factors include male gender, retention of native kidneys, smoking, transplant renal artery stenosis, adequate erythropoiesis prior to transplantation, and rejection-free course with well-functioning renal graft. Just as in other forms of erythrocytosis, a substantial number (approximately 60%) of patients with PTE experience malaise, headache, plethora, lethargy, and dizziness. Thromboembolic events occur in 10% to 30% of the cases; 1% to 2% eventually die of associated complications. Posttransplant erythrocytosis results from the combined trophic effect of multiple and interrelated erythropoietic factors. Among them, endogenous erythropoietin appears to play the central role. Persistent erythropoietin secretion from the diseased and chronically ischemic native kidneys does not conform to the normal feedback regulation, thereby establishing a form of "tertiary hypererythropoietinemia." However, erythropoietin levels in most PTE patients still remain within the "normal range," indicating that erythrocytosis finally ensues by the contributory action of additional growth factors on erythroid progenitors, such as angiotensin II, androgens, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Inactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, or an angiotensin II type 1 AT1 receptor blocker represents the most effective, safe, and well-tolerated therapeutic modality.

No abstract

No abstract

Several clinical and experimental observations suggest that an intact and activated renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may be an important determinant of erythropoiesis in a variety of clinical conditions, including hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency or failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure. Accordingly, RAS inactivation may confer susceptibility to the hematocrit-lowering effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Indeed, a dose-dependent decrease in hematocrit is observed within the first month of such therapy. In the majority of patients with hypertension decreases in hematocrit values after RAS inactivation are small and not clinically important. In extreme conditions, however, such as erythrocytosis after successful renal transplantation, secondary polycythemia of chronically hypoxemic COPD patients, erythrocytosis associated with renovascular hypertension, severe cardiac or renal failure, the hematocrit-lowering effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blocker may be profound and even lead to or worsen anemia. Hematocrit reaches its nadir value within three months, and then it remains stable during long-term observations. After discontinuation of RAS blockade, hematocrit values rise gradually over the next three to four months towards the pretreatment levels. The mechanism(s) related to this phenomenon is not yet fully understood, but angiotensin II seems to be responsible for inappropriately sustaining secretion of erythropoietin despite hematocrit elevation and capable to directly stimulate the erythroid progenitors in bone marrow to produce erythrocytes.

Background: Anaemia is a common finding in diabetes, particularly in those patients with albuminuria or renal dysfunction and is associated with impaired erythropoietin (EPO) secretion. This review focuses on mechanisms involved in the regulation of erythropoiesis in diabetic patients in an effort to elucidate the competing effects of the renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockade and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on haemoglobin concentration and hematocrit values. Summary: The RAS shows significant activation in diabetic subjects. Angiotensin II, its active octapeptide, causes renal tubulointerstitial hypoxia, which stimulates hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF) and increases EPO secretion and erythropoiesis. As expected, drugs that inactivate RAS, such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) are associated with a significant hematocrit-lowering effect and/or anaemia in various clinical conditions, including diabetes. Dual blockade by a combination of ACEi and ARB in diabetic patients achieves a better RAS inhibition, but at the same time a worse drop of haemoglobin concentration. Increased glucose reabsorption by SGLTs in diabetic subjects generates a high-glucose environment in renal tubulointerstitium, which may impair HIF-1, damage renal erythropoietin-producing cells (REPs) and decrease EPO secretion and erythropoiesis. SGLT2 inhibitors, which inhibit glucose reabsorption, may attenuate glucotoxicity in renal tubulointerstitium, allowing REPs to resume their function and increase EPO secretion. Indeed, EPO levels increase within a few weeks after initiation of therapy with all known SGLT2 inhibitors, followed by increased reticulocyte count and a gradual elevation of haemoglobin concentration and hematocrit level, which reach zenith values after 2-3 months. Key Messages: The competing effects of RAS blockade and SGLT2 inhibitors on erythropoiesis may have important clinical implications. The rise of hematocrit values by SGLT2 inhibitors given on top of RAS blockade in recent outcome trials may significantly contribute to the cardiorenal protection attained. The relative contribution of each system to erythropoiesis and outcome remains to be revealed in future studies.

*Thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism(s) may develop in heparin immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (HIT) patients after reexposure to heparin. At the Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 530 out of 17,000 patients requiring heart surgery over an 11-year period underwent preoperative HIT assessment by ELISA and a threepoint heparin-induced platelet aggregation assay (HIPAG). The screening identified 110 patients with HITreactive antibodies, out of which 46 were also thrombocytopenic (true HIT). Cardiac surgery was performed in HIT-positive patients under heparin anticoagulation and iloprost infusion. A control group of 118 HITnegative patients received heparin but no iloprost during surgery. For the first 20 patients, the dose of iloprost diminishing the HIPAG test to 5% was determined prior to surgery by in vitro titration using the patients' own plasma and donor platelets. In parallel, the iloprost "target dose" was also established for each patient intraoperatively, but before heparin administration. Iloprost was infused initially at 3 ng/kg/mL and further adjusted intraoperatively, until ex vivo aggregation reached 5%. As a close correlation was observed between the "target dose" identified before surgery and that established intraoperatively, the remaining 90 patients were administered iloprost starting at the presurgery identified "target dose." This process significantly reduced the number of intraoperative HIPAG reassessments needed to determine the iloprost target dose, and reduced surgical time, while maintaining similar primary clinical outcomes to controls. Therefore, infusion of iloprost throughout surgery, under continuous titration, allows cardiac surgery to be undertaken safely using heparin, while avoiding life-threatening iloprost-induced hypotension in patients diagnosed with HIT-reactive antibodies or true HIT.

Controlled clinical trials have shown that antimicrobial prophylaxis can lower the incidence of infection after certain operations, thus reducing morbidity, hospital stay, antibiotic usage and mortality due to sepsis. An effective prophylactic regimen should be directed against the most likely infecting organisms, but need not be active against every potential pathogen. Infection can be prevented when effective concentrations are present in the blood and the tissue during and shortly after the procedure. Therefore, antimicrobial prophylaxis should begin just before the operation: beginning earlier is unnecessary and potentially dangerous, beginning later is less effective. A single-dose prophylaxis after the induction of anesthesia is sufficient. If surgery is delayed or prolonged, a second dose is advisable if an antimicrobial drug with a short half-life is used. Postoperative administration is unnecessary and is harmful. Cephalosporins are considered to be the drug of choice, because they offer fewer allergic reactions. From the first generation cephalosporins, cefazolin has been widely recommended with success. From the second generation cephalosporins, cefuroxime, cefamandole and cefoxitin are increasingly recommended. Their antistaphylococcal activity is somewhat less strong but their activity against gram-negative bacteria is stronger. In addition, cefoxitin has good activity against anaerobes. Third generation cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime or ceftizoxime are generally not recommended for surgical prophylaxis. Despite these recommendations, they have been accepted by the medical community and are today in use in many countries as the most common drugs in surgical prophylaxis. Ceftriaxone in particular, is far exceeding the sales of any other drug for prophylaxis. Contra-indications, limitations, additional or other drugs and practical recommendations for specific procedures are discussed and the results of several prospective randomized studies are presented.

No abstract