No abstract

No abstract

This study examines the relation between the market value of equity and nonfinancial pollution measures (sulfur dioxide emissions) that capture firms' exposure to future environmental liabilities. I find that a nonfinancial pollution proxy is value-relevant for high-polluting electric utilities targeted for air pollution abatement by Phase One of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). On average, these utilities' exposure to (unbooked) future environmental liabilities decreased their mean 1990 share price by 16 percent. Moreover, the value relevance of the nonfinancial pollution proxy (1) increased in response to the passage of the stringent 1990 CAAA environmental legislation, and then (2) declined as the market subsequently reduced estimated compliance costs in response to changing economic and technological factors. Utilities not targeted by Phase One of the 1990 CAAA faced minimal exposure to future environmental liabilities and I find no significant relation between their pollution indicators and share prices. I also find that investors in the high-polluting rate-regulated utilities that were targeted by Phase One positively value a favorable regulatory climate.

Sport participation as a legacy of the Olympic Games (OG) has frequently featured as a component of the "legacy package" that government bodies and organizing committees promote to the local communities to gain support for the hosting of these mega-events. However, only recently increased sport participation has been explicitly included as part of a legacy plan in OG candidature files. This article examines the changes and development of sport legacy planning and implementation from Sydney 2000, London 2012, and Rio 2016. The three case studies confirm that sport participation legacies are only achieved if host governments engage the community, develop long-term strategies, and coordinate efforts between different government portfolios and with a range of relevant stakeholders. So far, there is limited evidence available to demonstrate that relevant government bodies have attempted to strategically leverage the Games with the purpose of developing a sport participation legacy for the wider population.

No abstract

No abstract

This paper describes a unique learning outcome process for the assessment of an undergraduate course in AIS. Learning expectations targeted for assessment are the “functional competencies” promulgated in the AICPA's Core Competency Framework for Entry into the Accounting Profession (Framework) (1999). This paper first frames the importance of assessment for motivating faculty to foster “continuous improvement” in student learning, as well as demonstrating accountability to public officials, accreditation bodies, and university administrators. The paper then focuses on a specific example (case study) of AIS course assessment. Evidence of student learning is observed, albeit imperfectly, through triangulation of multiple direct measurements, supplemented by indirect measures such as student self-assessments. Results indicate that students became more competent in certain functional competencies and also reflect that the expected emphasis on certain competencies to be gained in the AIS course required modification to the assessment plan. AIS instructors were also able to leverage assessment information for improving the consistency of course content and pedagogy in future semesters. Triangulation, therefore, provides evidence that the AIS course achieved its student learning goals while meeting departmental objectives, including successfully supporting the AACSB's maintenance of accreditation review for the College of Business.

This paper examines the effects of the investment opportunity set (IOS) on management's decision to capitalize or expense significant costs in two diverse settings: (1) in accounting for exploration and development (E&D) costs by firms in the oil-and-gas industry, and (2) in accounting for research and development (R&D) costs by firms (across industries) prior to 1974. We argue that the relation between the IOS and the decision to capitalize versus to expense is based upon managerial incentives to reduce the variance of accounting earnings. High-growth firms are more likely to have more variable earnings, which therefore creates greater incentives to reduce earnings variability. Because the capitalization method generally results in a lower variance of reported earnings than does the expensing method, high-growth firms are more likely to select capitalization. Our results show that, after controlling for firm size and for the indirect effects of the IOS mediated by debt contracts, high-growth firms (firms with fewer assets-in-place) are more likely than low-growth firms to select the capitalization method of accounting for E&D and R&D expenses.