Aim: We investigated how accurate observations of canonical babbling (CB) were and explored predictive babbling measures in children with and without medical diagnoses of conditions that can lead to speech and language problems.Methods: From 2012 to 2014 this Stockholm-based study recruited 38 children aged nine months to 21 months with medical diagnoses and 30 children aged 10 months without diagnoses and included 21 previously studied 12-month-old children without medical diagnoses. CB and consonant sound production were directly observed by video recording natural play with a caregiver. The percentage of CB was calculated from each recording, and a validated observation form was used. How accurately the children with and without CB were classified was investigated with sensitivity and specificity. The groups were compared using predictive babbling variables. Results:The observation method identified children with and without CB well, with a specificity of 0.89 and sensitivity of 0.93, respectively. Children with predictive babbling measures were identified in the clinical group (specificity 0.93-0.97), and a lack of these measures indicated a risk of being in the clinical group (odds ratios > 10). The sensitivity was low (0.32-0.42). Conclusion:Observation effectively identified a lack of CB and supported the importance of assessing babbling measures.

No abstract

No abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> A traditional curricular structure may challenge integration between foundational and clinical sciences in speech and language pathology (SLP) education. This project aimed to increase curriculum integration at a Swedish SLP education programme. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Learning outcomes in the existent curriculum were copied from their original courses and re-structured with reference to vertical tracks, in order to address them within and across years of study. A content analysis of interviews with teachers and students was conducted for the evaluation of curricular change. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the changes were earlier introduction to clinical science and revisiting of foundational sciences later in the education. Theme concepts were defined to scaffold horizontal integration, whereas revisited use of documented material was formalized to ensure vertical integration. In evaluation interviews, multiple examples were provided of how the new curriculum was perceived as being more integrated, with horizontal themes and vertical tracks providing structure. Concerns raised highlight the importance of appointing clear responsibilities. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The concepts “gaps” and “overlaps” may guide remediation of areas where increased curricular integration is warranted. Serial child observations running through the curriculum may provide a platform for both horizontal and vertical integration. For maintenance of curricular integration, clear responsibilities are needed, stretching across course and semester boundaries.