This research aims to explore what a repertoire of learning strategies of Thai EFL students are, how they transfer those strategies to English learning, and to what degree the strategies are beneficial for their English learning achievement. The effects of strategy instruction on the students' awareness of the language learning strategies are highlighted. Differences of strategy types and frequency of strategy use in different groups of low and high strategy users as well as high and low achievers of English language learning are identified. The study employs a mixed-methods research methodology. The quantitative data are collected through a 40-item general learning strategies questionnaire. The participants are 219 undergraduate students enrolling for a foundation English course. The qualitative data are derived from 32 student participants voluntarily taking part in semistructured interviews. The quantitative findings show that there is no significant difference on the strategies used for general learning and English learning. The students transfer their repertoire of learning strategies as a primary learning tool to contend with their English learning. There is positive correlation between the learning strategy use and the English learning achievement. The strategy instruction does not show a significant increase in strategy use. High and low achieving students use similar learning strategies; nevertheless, the frequency of learning strategy use and by what means they use the strategy signifies different types of language learners. The qualitative findings are complemented and help extend the quantitative data. Implications of the study concerning pedagogy in particular suggest a new perspective for the EFL Thai teachers in implementing suitable learning strategies for the students to learn more successfully.
<p>This research aims to understand language learning strategies of Thai adult learners and factors affecting their strategy use. The participants are forty officers of General Service Division of the Council of State of Thailand, attending an English training course for developing their work potential. The data were collected through the questionnaire adapted from the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). To further explore personal views about their experience in learning strategies and factors influential on their strategy use, fifteen participants were selected for individual interviews. Findings revealed that the learners reported an overall preference for the use of social strategies. Analysis of the qualitative data confirmed most of the SILL responses and revealed additional strategies and factors affecting the strategy use. Individual learners chose strategies suitable for the achievement of their goals and take account of their affective needs and work context. Overall, this study has emphasized the necessity of having qualitative data which can enrich and illuminate the findings of quantitative data and could be valuable resources for considering appropriate ways in which English proficiency of Thai adult learners could be developed. Implications are drawn regarding the language learning strategies of adult learners and their strategy use as professional engagement as well as recommendations for future research.<strong></strong></p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.