Slang, either the form or the meaning is flexible and temporary, which canchange anytime depending on the user. This phenomenon also occurs in the trendy slang used by Gen Z. Therefore, this study aims to find out the types of word formation process in Gen Z slang. It focuses only on Gen Z slang that is in Callahan's Generation Z Dictionary. Further, this study is corpus-based, using qualitative analysis in investigating the types of word formation process in Gen Z slang. To analyze the corpus, there are two steps used that are classifying and interpreting. The finding reveals that there are eight types of word formation process, which influence in forming the Gen Z slang. Those types are fanciful formation, compounding, blending, clipping, conversion, suffixation, multiple process, and reduplicatives. Among those types, compounding is the most used. There are ten slang terms come through this types of process and this study presents all types of compounding. Those types are compound noun with one slang term, compound adjective with five slang terms, and compound verb with four slang terms. In conclusion, Gen Z slang is formed through eight types of the word formation process and compounding is the most used.
This study aims to observe and describe the types of personal deixis used in Malcolm X’s “The Ballot or The Bullet” speech using the theory of Yule (1996). In collecting the data, this qualitative descriptive method was used by watching the video documentation, downloading the transcript, and reading the script that contain personal deixis in the speech. The theory of Miles and Huberman (1994) was used in this study as the steps to analyze the data which consists of data reduction, data display, and data drawing. The result of this study found out there was 662 deixis that consisted of three types of person deixis which are first-person, second-person, and third-person divided into 14 types of personal deixis use, i.e 222 first-person deixes, 211 second-person deixis, and 229 third-person with second-person deixis You (174 times use), They (84 times use) and We (79 times use) as the most often used type in the speech. In addition, Malcolm X used personal deictic expressions as a way to motivate and influence the African-American community in empowering the important philosophy of black nationalism against the racism issue of the African-American community in the 20th-century era.
This research aims to know any difference of students’ ability in writing procedure text who were taught through implementation differentiation instruction and conventional teaching. Employing a mixed-method approach, this research focuses on 128 students of SMA Negeri 1 Wonosari, Boalemo Regency, Gorontalo Province as research population and 32 students of class X B, as the experimental class and X C, as the control class, respectively, as research samples. Data collection involves two methods, which are PASL survey to obtain students’ interests and learning styles, as well as an essay test. As a means of assessing the effect of the treatment on students writing, a scoring rubric proposed by Brown (2007) is utilized. Data analysis involves a statistical analysis, specifically t-test, followed by the experimental data analysis with the pre-test and post-test models. Based on the findings, the result of calculation showed the value of Tcount as 5.53 and the value of Table is 1.822. Therefore, since Tcount >Ttable, H0 is rejected, which implies that there is statistical evidence to support the presence of a significant difference in students' writing ability through the implementation of differentiated instruction. In summary, the research suggests that differentiated instruction has a positive impact on students' writing ability compared to conventional teaching methods, based on the statistical analysis and the rejection of the null hypothesis. Keywords: writing ability, differentiated instruction, mixed-method approach
The objective of this research is to describe the morphological and phonological varying system of Gorontalo language, and its problem in organizing them in custom terms dictionary. The method used is qualitative with the data collection techniques involved observing, recording the language in a practical poem of the traditional ceremony, and other published books. The agreement of wordwriting problems through workshop alignment and standardization are (1) deletion of sound y and w in certain words, (2) there is no unique phonetic symbols of apostrophe for glottal sound between two sequence vowels written side by side in a row, (3) selection of writing nt for the sound /ð/, (4) selection of particles mayi, mota, mola, mao, ma, ngo, o (for verb not for noun), hi, lo, de, dipo, ta, (5) selection of prefix po attached to the verbs, (6) variations of long and short vowels writing on certain phonemes.
The objestives of the research of word formation system of Suwawa Language in Computer Program are giving the description of i) the WFRs (world formation rules) of affixes in Suwawa language, ii) the system of WFRs in Suwawa language and its word structure. The method used in this research is qualitative. It analyzes language data in the True Basic program. The finding of this research is the rules of the words, which consist of simple and complex rules of derivation, inflection, and compound. Those are 9 rules. From the 9 rules found 41 prefix, 1 infiks "in", 14 suffix, 17 compound. Besides, there is only the positive degree rule in Suwawa Language. PhR (Phonological Restricton) which is included in TR (Truncation Rules) of RRs (Readjustment Rules) found seven rules. In CR (compound rules), there is a rule named PCRs (Partial compound rules) which has three kinds of PCRs those are: a) PCRs of fisrt syllable, b) PCRs of second syllable, and c) PCRs of affixes as to form.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.