Agricultural professionals are spending increasing amounts of time making treatment decisions for soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura. In an effort to reduce the time required to make treatment decisions, a binomial sequential sampling plan called “Speed Scouting” was developed for soybean aphid. In 2005, we validated Speed Scouting using commercial fields in Minnesota and replicated small plot trials in four states in the North Central Region of the USA (Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin). In commercial fields, yield (bu/acre ± S.E.) was significantly higher in areas of the fields where treatment was applied based on Speed Scouting (50.7 ± 1.7) compared to untreated controls (46.9 ± 1.6). When comparing treatment decisions based on Speed Scouting and whole‐plant counts, the same decision was reached 79% of the time. Results from 5 of the 6 small plot trials showed no significant yield difference when aphid control decisions were made using Speed Scouting compared to whole‐plant counts using an economic threshold of 250 aphids per plant. Speed Scouting is a conservative sampling plan, and consistently recommended treatment before populations reached the economic threshold using whole‐plant counts. Using either sampling method, soybean aphid management should rely on multiple samples over time to accurately assess population growth rates to avoid unnecessary foliar applications.
Since the introduction of soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, from Asia, insecticide use in soybean has increased substantially in the north central United States. Insecticide seed treatments and aphid resistant soybean varieties are management tactics that may reduce reliance on foliar applications of broad-spectrum insecticides. Exploring potential nontarget impacts of these technologies will be an important step in incorporating them into aphid management programs. We investigated impacts of thiamethoxam seed treatment and Rag1 aphid resistant soybean on a fungal pathogen of soybean aphid, Pandora neoaphidis (Remaudière & Hennebert) Humber, via open plot and cage studies. We found that although thiamethoxam seed treatment did significantly lower aphid pressure in open plots compared with an untreated control, this reduction in aphid density translated into nonsignificant decreases in fungal disease prevalence in aphids. Furthermore, when aphid densities were approximately equal in seed treated and untreated soybean, no impact on aphid fungal disease was observed. In open plots, Rag1 resistant soybean experienced lower aphid pressure and aphid disease prevalence compared with a nonresistant isoline. However, in cages when aphid densities were equivalent in both resistant and susceptible soybean, resistance had no impact on aphid disease prevalence. The addition of thiamethoxam seed treatment to resistant soybean yielded aphid densities and aphid disease prevalence similar to untreated, resistant soybean. These studies provide evidence that thiamethoxam seed treatments and Rag1 resistance can impact P. neoaphidis via decreased aphid densities; however, this impact is minimal, implying use of seed treatments and host plant resistance are compatible with P. neoaphidis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.