Vitamin K is a cofactor in the production of blood coagulation factors (in the liver), osteocalcin (in bone), and matrix Gla protein (cartilage and vessel wall). Accumulating evidence suggests that for optimal bone and vascular health, relatively high intakes of vitamin K are required. The synthetic short-chain vitamin K 1 is commonly used in food supplements, but recently the natural long-chain menaquinone-7 (MK-7) has also become available as an over-the-counter (OTC) supplement. The purpose of this paper was to compare in healthy volunteers the absorption and efficacy of K 1 and MK-7. Serum vitamin K species were used as a marker for absorption and osteocalcin carboxylation as a marker for activity. Both K 1 and MK-7 were absorbed well, with peak serum concentrations at 4 hours after intake. A major difference between the 2 vitamin K species is the very long half-life time of MK-7, resulting in much more stable serum levels, and accumulation of MK-7 to higher levels (7-to 8-fold) during prolonged intake. MK-7 induced more complete carboxylation of osteocalcin, and hematologists should be aware that preparations supplying 50 g/d or more of MK-7 may interfere with oral anticoagulant treatment in a clinically relevant way.

SummaryUnfractionated heparin (UFH) remains the anticoagulant of choice during pregnancy. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are an attractive alternative to UFH due to their logistic advantages and their association with a lower incidence of osteoporosis and HIT. We reviewed all published clinical reports concerning the use of LMWH during pregnancy. In addition, participants of an international interest group contributed a cohort of pregnant women treated with LMWH. Pregnancies were divided into two groups; those with and those without maternal comorbid conditions. The number of adverse fetal outcomes and the occurrence of maternal complications were evaluated in the two groups. In the group of women with comorbid conditions (n = 290), 13.4% of the pregnancies were associated with an adverse fetal outcome. In contrast, in the group of women without comorbid conditions (n = 196), 3.1% were associated with an adverse outcome, which is comparable to that seen in the normal population. We conclude that LMWH appear to be a safe alternative to unfractionated heparin as an anticoagulant during pregnancy.

Summary.Epidemiological studies have shown that women who use third-generation oral contraceptives (OC) containing desogestrel, gestodene or norgestimate have a higher risk of venous thrombosis than women who use second-generation OC containing levonorgestrel. It is also known that a mutation in factor V (factor V Leiden ), which results in resistance to activated protein C (APC) and which is the most common cause of hereditary thrombophilia, potentiates the prothrombotic effect of OC.Effects of APC on thrombin generation in the plasma of women using OC were compared to the response to APC in non-OC users and in individuals that were heterozygous or homozygous for factor V Leiden . The response towards APC was evaluated on basis of the ratio (APC-sr) of the time integrals of thrombin formation determined in the presence and absence of APC.Compared with women not using OC, women who used OC exhibited a significantly decreased sensitivity to APC (P < 0 . 001), independent of the kind of OC used. Women who used third-generation monophasic OC were significantly less sensitive to APC than women using second-generation OC (P < 0 . 001) and had APC-sr that did not significantly differ from heterozygous female carriers of factor V Leiden who did not use OC. Women who were heterozygous for factor V Leiden and used OC had APC-sr in the range of homozygous carriers of factor V Leiden . Two women who started OC therapy had significantly elevated APC-sr within 3 d.Acquired APC resistance may explain the epidemiological observation of increased risk for venous thrombosis in OC users, especially in women using third-generation OC.

Key Points• The inhibitor incidence in nonsevere hemophilia A patients with certain F8 mutations approaches the inhibitor incidence in severe patients.• These findings are highly relevant for clinical practice, as they facilitate identification of high-risk patients based on F8 genotype.Neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) toward factor VIII form a severe complication in nonsevere hemophilia A, profoundly aggravating the bleeding pattern. Identification of high-risk patients is hampered by lack of data that take exposure days to therapeutic factor VIII concentrates into account. In the INSIGHT study, we analyzed the association between F8 mutation and inhibitor development in patients with nonsevere hemophilia A (factor VIII 2-40 IU/dL). This analysis included 1112 nonsevere hemophilia A patients from 14 centers in Europe and Australia that had genotyped at least 70% of their patients. Inhibitor risk was calculated as KaplanMeier incidence with cumulative number of exposure days as the time variable. During 44 800 exposure days (median, 24 exposure days per patient; interquartile range [IQR], 7-90), 59 of the 1112 patients developed an inhibitor; cumulative incidence of 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-6.6) after a median of 28 exposure days (IQR,. The inhibitor risk at 50 exposure days was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.5-8.9) and at 100 exposure days the risk further increased to 13.3% (95% CI, 9.6-17.0). Among a total of 214 different F8 missense mutations 19 were associated with inhibitor development. These results emphasize the importance of F8 genotyping in nonsevere hemophilia A. (Blood. 2013; 122(11):1954-1962 IntroductionPatients with hemophilia A who are treated with factor VIII concentrates are at risk of developing factor VIII neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors).1,2 Inhibitor development is one of the most challenging complications in the treatment of hemophilia A, as it increases the bleeding tendency while it renders treatment with therapeutic factor VIII concentrates ineffective. Although inhibitor development is less frequently observed in patients with nonsevere hemophilia A (baseline factor VIII activity of 2-40 IU/dL), the clinical impact can be profound. In these patients, inhibitors may also interact with their endogenous factor VIII, resulting in a decrease of the factor VIII plasma level below 1 IU/dL 1 and major bleeding complications. 4 Identification of patients at risk of developing inhibitors may help to prevent this serious complication. However, currently there are no tools available to predict individual inhibitor risk in nonsevere hemophilia patients.The type of mutation in the factor VIII gene (F8) is an important risk factor for inhibitor development. [5][6][7] Nonsevere hemophilia A is generally caused by F8 missense mutations.8 Despite information on large numbers of F8 mutations associated with nonsevere hemophilia A that is collected in international databases, 9,10 it is not possible to calculate the inhibitor risk for specific F8 mutations, as data on exposure days to thera...

The lag time, ETP and peak height of thrombin generation depend on the levels of multiple coagulation factors and inhibitors. The specific assay determinants vary with the experimental conditions.