No abstract

The psychological reactions of 22 parental couples and 3 single parents were investigated after disclosure of genetic test results of their children. The children were tested for the early-onset, monogenetic cancer disorder multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Participants came from 13 different families and were aged between 28 and 47 years. Parents who were informed that their child was a gene carrier reacted with resignation, showed moderate to high levels of test-related and general anxiety, but few psychological complaints. Daily activities were disturbed in 43% of the parents with carrier-children. There was little disruption of the parents' future perspective, apart from some socioeconomic disadvantages and increased parental concern for the carrier-children. Most parents with carrier-children showed restraint with respect to short-term prophylactic treatment. Parents with favorable test results showed significantly less anxiety and no disturbance in their daily activities. They did not, however, seem to be reassured by the DNA test result. These parents questioned the reliability of the DNA test, wanted confirmation of the test results, and were eager to continue screening of their noncarrier children. Parents, especially those with a lower level of education and/or a pessimistic view of the future, were distressed by unfavorable test results. Additional counseling is advised to prevent parents of carrier-children worrying unnecessarily, or parents with children in whom the disease gene was not found being not reassured. Am. J. Med. Genet. 94:316-323, 2000.

Can a parent adjust to the idea that its child is at risk for a sudden death? This question is raised by a diagnostic procedure in which children were tested for an inherited Long QT Syndrome (LQTS). This potentially life-threatening but treatable cardiac arrhythmia syndrome may cause sudden death, especially in children and young adults. The long-term psychological effects are described for parents whose children were tested for inherited LQTS. The adverse short-term impact of such testing has been described previously. The goal of this investigation is to determine whether this distress endures. Thirty-six parents completed measures of psychological distress. With the twenty-four parents of carrier children, a semi-structured interview was held 18 months after DNA disclosure. Parents of carrier children reported more distress than parents of non-carrier children. Parents of carrier children remained vulnerable to high levels of distress; up to one-third of these parents showed clinically relevant high levels of distress. High levels of distress were reported by parents of carrier children who (1) were highly distressed at previous assessments, (2) were familiar with the disease for a longer time, (3) had experienced a sudden death in the family, (4) were lesser educated, and who (5) were unsatisfied with the given information. Parents were particularly concerned about possible hazardous behavior during puberty. We conclude that the continuous threat of developing LQTS symptoms despite prophylactic treatment affected the psychological well-being of the parents for a long time. In light of the tempetuous developments in the areas of cardiac genetics, periodical information on new insight and developments may act as a buffer for the parents' (growing) concerns about their child's inherited disorder.

Objectives: To assess the psychological effect of predictive testing in parents of children at risk for long QT syndrome (LQTS) in a prospective study.Methods: After their child was clinically screened by electrocardiography and blood was taken for DNA analysis, and shortly after delivery of the DNA test result, 36 parents completed measures of psychological distress. Results: 24 parents were informed that at least one of their children is a mutation carrier. Up to 50% of the parents of carrier children showed clinically relevant high levels of distress. Parents who were familiar with the disease for a longer time, who had more experiences with the disease in their family and who received positive test results for all their children were most distressed. Conclusions: Predictive ECG testing together with DNA testing has a profound impact on parents whose minors undergo predictive testing for LQTS.