This paper reports the findings of a global survey of practice patterns for the management of patients with haemophilia A. A total of 147 haemophilia treatment centres worldwide responded to the questionnaire, supplying data for 16 115 patients with haemophilia A. From these responses, 38% (range: 25-48%) of patients were under 18 years old. Almost half (47%) of patients were reported to have mild or moderate haemophilia A, 48% had severe haemophilia A (no inhibitor) and 5% were inhibitor patients. Less than half of patients with severe haemophilia A received prophylactic therapy (37%, excluding inhibitor patients) and 54% received on-demand treatment; the remaining 9% were inhibitor patients. Primary prophylaxis rates for severe haemophilia ranged from 73% in Sweden to 17% in the USA. Most respondents (80%) ranked infrequent bleeds as one of the top five reasons for not administering prophylactic treatment, followed by venous access (60%) and cost (45%). Of patients with severe haemophilia (non-inhibitor), 32% on primary prophylaxis and 27% on secondary prophylaxis had indwelling catheters. Risk of infection and the patient's inability to maintain the line were the key concerns cited by nurses relating to venous access. The mean ratio of nurses to patients with haemophilia A was 1:69 and nurses felt that they were either fully (26%) or mostly (45%) autonomous in assessment and treatment decisions. Results from this current survey suggest that worldwide research should be continued so as to improve outcomes through the identification of optimal treatment protocols for the management of haemophilia A.

It is well known that teenagers with chronic diseases have problems complying with their treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient's knowledge of haemophilia and his compliance to prophylactic treatment, and the age at which the patient took over the responsibility for his disease and to create educational material for teenagers and adolescents. This was a prospective multicentre study performed in Hemophilia Treatment Centres in Scandinavia. A total of 108 of 134 patients, between 13 and 25 years completed the questionnaire, a response rate of 80%. Eighty-three patients had a severe form of haemophilia, 24 patients in moderate form and one patient did not know the severity of his disease. Seventy-eight patients were on prophylactic treatment. The median age for starting prophylactic treatment was 3.0 years and the median age for the patient performing venepuncture was 11.6 years. Sixty-seven of 78 patients knew that the best time to give prophylactic treatment was in the morning. Even though the patients were on prophylactic treatment, 47 of 78 patients took additional treatment before sports activities. At a mean age of 14.1 years the patient himself had the responsibility for his disease and treatment. In the cohort of 108 patients, 73 were aware of their haemophilia heredity. This study shows a rather high degree of knowledge of haemophilia and compliance with treatment among the patients but it is of great importance for the nurse to continuously improve the patient's compliance and keep him aware of the benefit of regular treatment for his future well being.

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship between coagulation factor level and bleeding frequency during prophylactic treatment of haemophilia after stratification of the patients according to joint scores. The secondary aim was to obtain a systematic overview of the doses of coagulation factors prescribed for prophylaxis at the Malmo haemophilia treatment centre during a 6-year period. A retrospective survey of medical records for the years 1997-2002 and pharmacokinetic study results from the 1990s was complemented by collection of blood samples for coagulation factor assay when needed. Information on the dosing and plasma levels of factor VIII or factor IX, joint scores and incidence of bleedings (joint bleeds and 'other bleeds') was compiled. The patients were stratified by age (0-6, 7-12, 13-18, 19-36 and >36 years) and joint score (0, 1-6 and >6). Individual pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma coagulation factor activities (FVIII:C and FIX:C) were estimated. Trough levels during the treatment were calculated, as well as the number of hours per week of treatment during which plasma FVIII:C/FIX:C fell below a 1, 2 or 3% target level. Fifty-one patients with haemophilia A (two moderate, 49 severe) and 13 with haemophilia B (all severe) were included, yielding data for 364 patient-years of treatment. There was a wide range of dosing schedules, the most common ones being three times a week or every other day for FVIII and twice a week or every third day for FIX. The overall relationship between FVIII:C/FIX:C levels and incidence of joint bleeding was very weak, even after stratification of the patients according to joint score. There was no relationship between coagulation factor level and incidence of other bleeds. In this cohort of patients on high-dose prophylactic treatment, dosing was based more on clinical outcome in terms of bleeding frequency than on the aim to maintain a 1% target level of FVIII:C/FIX:C. Some patients did not bleed in spite of a trough level of <1% and others did in spite of trough levels >3%. The practical implication of our findings is that dosing in prophylactic treatment of haemophilia should be individualized. Thus, proposed standard regimens should be implemented only after careful clinical consideration, with a high readiness for re-assessment and individual dose tailoring.

Increased or maintained health and quality of life (HRQoL) are essential goals in health care among patients with a chronic disease. To gain an understanding of HRQoL in patients with haemophilia at the Haemophilia Treatment Centre in Malmö, Sweden, patients seen from 2004-2008 were asked to complete the Short form Health Survey, SF-36, also answering to what extent haemophilia, physically and mentally, interferes with their daily life at their annual check-up. Data were extracted from the UMAS Haemophilia Database. Interference of haemophilia in daily life was estimated using a Visual Analogue Scale. A total of 105/144 haemophilia patients were included in the study (73%); 28 mildly, 21 moderately and 56 severely affected. The median age of patients at study entry was 44.0 years (range 18-84 years). The comparison of SF-36 data of Swedish haemophilia patients with the general Swedish male population yielded no significant differences in age groups 15-24, 25-34 and 65-74 years. Patients in age groups 35-44 years, 45-54 years and 55-64 years were significantly impaired in some of their HRQoL domains. For severely affected patients who filled in SF-36 over a period of 5 years no statistical differences in HRQoL were found. For patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery HRQoL increased in most SF-36 domains. Patients reported in general on the VAS that they feel 'somehow' interfered in their daily life due to haemophilia. The results indicate a need for continuous monitoring of HRQoL to identify an increased need of care in the ageing haemophilia population.

Caregivers of children with inhibitors reported higher impact of the disease compared to caregivers of children with no inhibitors. No differences between mothers and fathers in the two groups for SF-36, Caregivers' Burden Scale, VAS and IOF, except for domain pain in SF-36 where mothers reported higher impairments.

Regular replacement therapy (prophylaxis) for haemophilia has been shown to prevent development of disabling arthropathy and to provide a better quality of life compared to treatment on demand; however, at a substantially higher cost. Calculations based on pharmacokinetic principles have shown that shortening dose intervals may reduce cost. The aim of this prospective, randomized, crossover pilot study was to address whether daily dosing is feasible, if it reduces concentrate consumption and is as effective in preventing bleeding as the standard prophylactic dosing regimen. In a 12+12 month crossover study, 13 patients were randomized to start either their own previously prescribed standard dose, or daily dosing adjusted to maintain at least the same trough levels as obtained with the standard dose. Ten patients completed the study. A 30% reduction in cost of factor concentrates was achieved with daily prophylaxis. However, the number of bleeding events increased in some patients in the daily dosing arm and patients reported decreased quality of life during daily prophylaxis. Daily treatment had a greater impact on daily life, and the patients found it more stressful.Prophylaxis with daily dosing may be feasible and efficacious in some patients. A substantial reduction of factor consumption and costs can be realized, but larger studies are needed before the introduction of daily prophylaxis into clinical routine can be recommended.

The aim of this study was to investigate individual pharmacokinetics as a tool for dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) in severe hemophilia A. It is assumed that effective prophylaxis against bleedings is maintained if the plasma FVIII:C activity is kept above 1 U/dl, and the present study is based on this assumption. A current standard dosage regimen for FVIII is 25–40 U/kg up to three times weekly. However, there is considerable individual variation in the pharmacokinetics of FVIII:C. Individual pharmacokinetic data were used to computer‐simulate plasma activity curves after repeated doses in 8 patients. Going from prophylaxis regimens of normally 2–3 infusions per week to dosing every 2 days would theoretically reduce their average FVIII consumption by 43% with maintained or increased trough levels of FVIII:C. Daily dosing would reduce their mean FVIII usage by 82%. Modified dosage regimens, infusions every 2 days, were implemented in the patients, and plasma samples were drawn to verify the pharmacokinetic models. The feasibility of the method to generally raise trough levels with a decreased consumption of FVIII was confirmed. Dosing of coagulation factors according to kinetic principles can result in more cost‐effective utilization of these very expensive preparations.

Patients with moderate and severe haemophilia are evaluated on a regular basis at their haemophilia centres but patients with mild haemophilia are seen less often because of fewer problems related to their disease. The needs of patients with milder forms of haemophilia, however, are often underestimated, both by the patient and staff at healthcare facilities. This study evaluated the knowledge of disease and adherence to treatment among patients with severe, moderate and mild haemophilia. This was a prospective multicentre study performed in Haemophilia Centres in Scandinavia. A total of 413 (67%) of 612 patients aged >25 years with mild, moderate and severe haemophilia completed a self-administered questionnaire. The mean age of the respondents was 49.7 years (range 25-87 years). Of the 413 respondents, 150 had a mild, 86 had a moderate and 177 had a severe form of haemophilia. A total of 22 (5%) patients did not know the severity of their disease, and 230 (56%) patients knew the effect of factor concentrate in the blood. Of the 413 respondents, 53 (13%) of the cohort never treated a haemorrhage. Patients with mild haemophilia, P