BackgroundTherapeutic vaccination against disseminated prostate cancer (PCa) is partially effective in some PCa patients. We hypothesized that the efficacy of treatment will be enhanced by individualized vaccination regimens tailored by simple mathematical models.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe developed a general mathematical model encompassing the basic interactions of a vaccine, immune system and PCa cells, and validated it by the results of a clinical trial testing an allogeneic PCa whole-cell vaccine. For model validation in the absence of any other pertinent marker, we used the clinically measured changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as a correlate of tumor burden. Up to 26 PSA levels measured per patient were divided into each patient's training set and his validation set. The training set, used for model personalization, contained the patient's initial sequence of PSA levels; the validation set contained his subsequent PSA data points. Personalized models were simulated to predict changes in tumor burden and PSA levels and predictions were compared to the validation set. The model accurately predicted PSA levels over the entire measured period in 12 of the 15 vaccination-responsive patients (the coefficient of determination between the predicted and observed PSA values was R 2 = 0.972). The model could not account for the inconsistent changes in PSA levels in 3 of the 15 responsive patients at the end of treatment. Each validated personalized model was simulated under many hypothetical immunotherapy protocols to suggest alternative vaccination regimens. Personalized regimens predicted to enhance the effects of therapy differed among the patients.Conclusions/SignificanceUsing a few initial measurements, we constructed robust patient-specific models of PCa immunotherapy, which were retrospectively validated by clinical trial results. Our results emphasize the potential value and feasibility of individualized model-suggested immunotherapy protocols.

The Wnt signalling pathway controls cell proliferation and differentiation, and its deregulation is implicated in different diseases including cancer. Learning how to manipulate this pathway could substantially contribute to the development of therapies. We developed a mathematical model describing the initial sequence of events in the Wnt pathway, from ligand binding to β-catenin accumulation, and the effects of inhibitors, such as sFRPs (secreted Frizzled-related proteins) and Dkk (Dickkopf). Model parameters were retrieved from experimental data reported previously. The model was retrospectively validated by accurately predicting the effects of Wnt3a and sFRP1 on β-catenin levels in two independent published experiments (R(2) between 0.63 and 0.91). Prospective validation was obtained by testing the model's accuracy in predicting the effect of Dkk1 on Wnt-induced β-catenin accumulation (R(2)≈0.94). Model simulations under different combinations of sFRP1 and Dkk1 predicted a clear synergistic effect of these two inhibitors on β-catenin accumulation, which may point towards a new treatment avenue. Our model allows precise calculation of the effect of inhibitors applied alone or in combination, and provides a flexible framework for identifying potential targets for intervention in the Wnt signalling pathway.

Although therapeutic vaccination often induces markers of tumor-specific immunity, therapeutic responses remain rare. An improved understanding of patient-specific dynamic interactions of immunity and tumor progression, combined with personalized application of immune therapeutics would increase the efficacy of immunotherapy. Here, we developed a method to predict and enhance the individual response to immunotherapy by using personalized mathematical models, constructed in the early phase of treatment. Our approach includes an iterative real-time in-treatment evaluation of patient-specific parameters from the accruing clinical data, construction of personalized models and their validation, model-based simulation of subsequent response to ongoing therapy, and suggestion of potentially more effective patient-specific modified treatment. Using a mathematical model of prostate cancer immunotherapy, we applied our model to data obtained in a clinical investigation of an allogeneic whole-cell therapeutic prostate cancer vaccine. Personalized models for the patients who responded to treatment were derived and validated by data collected before treatment and during its early phase. Simulations, based on personalized models, suggested that an increase in vaccine dose and administration frequency would stabilize the disease in most patients. Together, our findings suggest that application of our method could facilitate development of a new paradigm for studies of in-treatment personalization of the immune agent administration regimens (P-trials), with treatment modifications restricted to an approved range, resulting in more efficacious immunotherapies. Cancer Res; 72(9); 2218-27. Ó2012 AACR.

The suggested methodology has the potential to raise the overall efficacy of the developed immunotherapy. If implemented already during drug development it may increase the prospects of the technology being approved for clinical use. However, schedule personalization, per se, does not comply with the current, 'one size fits all,' paradigm of clinical trials. It is worthwhile considering adjustment of the current paradigm to involve personally tailored immunotherapy regimens.