A retrospective analysis was performed of 54 consecutive adult patients with intracranial abscesses hospitalized between 1973 and 1985. Clinical signs and symptoms were varying and no single symptom was found in more than 48% of the patients. Also the laboratory findings were of limited diagnostic value. The etiology of the infections varied with the sources and could be identified in 42 of the patients. In patients with postoperative abscesses or infections after penetrating head injuries Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly found causative agent. In patients with abscesses originating from sinus, dental or otogenic infections, anaerobic bacteria dominated and most patients had multiple bacterial isolates. A majority of patients (33/47) with diagnosed abscesses were treated with both surgical drainage and systemic antibiotics. 14 patients received antibiotics only, due to inoperable abscesses or spontaneous regression without surgery. 17 of the patients (31.5%) died from their intracranial infections and only 9 survived without sequelae. Important prognostic factors were missed diagnosis and presence of multiple or ruptured abscesses. One patient died of acute brain stem herniation after lumbar puncture, a procedure which was found to be of limited diagnostic value and which seems to be contraindicated in patients with intracranial abscesses.

Total costs did not differ between minilaparotomy cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy with high-volume surgery and disposable trocars, whereas laparoscopic cholecystectomy was more expensive with fewer operations and disposable trocars. The gain in health-related quality of life with laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with minilaparotomy cholecystectomy was small and of limited duration.

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now considered the first option for gallbladder surgery. However, 20% to 30% of cholecystectomies are completed as open operations often on elderly and fragile patients. The external validity of randomised trials comparing mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not been studied. The aim of this study is to analyse characteristics, procedures, and outcomes for all patients who underwent cholecystectomy without being included in such a trial.

Total direct costs were significantly lower for the outpatient treatment strategy for deep venous thrombosis compared to the inpatient treatment strategy. No significant difference in health impact could be detected. Deep venous thrombosis can to a greater extent than previously be treated in primary care, safely, at a lower cost, and in accordance with patient preferences.

PurposeFrom the late 1980s and onwards health care in Sweden has come under increasing financial pressure, forcing policy makers to consider restrictions. The aim of this paper is to review experiences and to establish lessons of formal priority setting in four Swedish regional health authorities during the period 2003-2012. Design/methodology/approachThis paper draws on a variety of sources, and evidence is organised according to three broad aspects: design and implementation of models and processes, application of evidence and decision analysis tools, and decision making and implementation of decisions. FindingsThe processes accounted for here have resulted in useful experiences concerning technical arrangements as well as political and public strategies. All four sites used a particular model for priority setting that combined top-down and bottom-up driven elements. Although the process was authorised from the top it was clearly bottom-up driven and the template followed a professional rationale. New meeting grounds were introduced between politicians and clinical leaders. Overall a limited group of stakeholders were involved. By defusing political conflicts the likelihood that clinical leaders would regard this undertaking as important increased. Originality/valueOne tendency today is to unburden regional authorities of the hard decisions by introducing arrangements at national level. This study suggests that regional health authorities, in spite of being politically governed organisations, have the potential to execute a formal priority-setting process. Still, to make priority setting processes more robust to internal as well as external threat remains a challenge.