Objectives: To investigate whether metacognitive impairments in self-awareness and self-monitoring occur in patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), particularly among those with prominent social and dysexecutive impairments. Methods: Patients diagnosed with FTD were divided by clinical subtype (social-dysexecutive (n = 12) aphasic (n = 15), and constituent subgroups of progressive non-fluent aphasia and semantic dementia) and compared with subjects with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 11) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 11). All subjects completed comprehensive behavioural ratings scales, which were compared with caregiver ratings. Subjects also rated their test performances in verbal associative fluency, word list learning, and memory task with comparisons made between actual and judged performance levels. Results: The FTD sample as a whole showed significantly less behavioural self-awareness and selfknowledge than the AD and healthy control samples. FTD patients with prominent social and dysexecutive impairments demonstrated the most extensive loss of self-awareness and self-knowledge, significantly overrating themselves in multiple social, emotional, and cognitive domains, and failing to acknowledge that any behavioural change had occurred in most areas. The remaining clinical samples showed select and minimal discrepancies. All clinical groups were significantly unaware of their apathy levels. Most FTD patients judged episodic cognitive test performance adequately, with partial difficulties observed in the socially impaired and progressive non-fluent aphasia subgroups. Conclusions: FTD patients, particularly those with prominent social and dysexecutive impairments, exhibit profound metacognitive anosognosia that may represent a loss of self-awareness, self-monitoring, and self-knowledge, likely related to significant prefrontal pathophysiology. Other FTD clinical groups and AD patients showed less pervasive and more select metacognitive deficiencies. M etacognition refers to diverse processes of self-knowledge, self-monitoring, and self-regulation that contribute to adaptive behaviour in complex and changing environments. [1][2][3][4] Metacognition is considered a domain of information processing that comprises personal awareness and knowledge as well as adaptive strategies. These processes can be operationalised as experimental measures in certain tasks. For example, individuals can be asked to predict their expected performance in a particular task, such as learning a word list. This entails derived selfknowledge of abilities (established on the basis of various previous experiences, incorporation of feedback, and selfreflection), experiences and synthesis of that information for judgement purposes. Individuals can also be asked how hard or easy it will be to learn particular words, as in judgement of learning measures that draw upon knowledge of stimulus characteristics and previous experience with those types of items. In addition to self-predictions, metacognition can be probed by secur...

The cognitive and neuroanatomic dissociations between CBD and SD are consistent with the hypothesis that number and object representations constitute distinct domains in semantic memory, and these domains appear to be associated with distinct neural substrates.

No abstract

We studied the neural basis for confrontation naming difficulty in 29 patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) by correlating naming with voxel-based morphometric analyses of gray matter volume in structural MRI. We found that naming is significantly impaired in FTD, including patients with semantic dementia (SD), progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA), and nonaphasic patients (NON-APH) with a disorder of social and executive functioning. Significant cortical atrophy was found in the left anterior temporal cortex in all three FTD subgroups relative to healthy seniors. We also found significant cortical atrophy in unique anatomic distributions in each FTD subgroup. This included: lateral, ventral, and parahippocampal regions of the left temporal lobe in SD; inferior, orbital, dorsolateral, and premotor regions of the left frontal lobe in PNFA, and bilateral frontal regions in NON-APH. Direct correlations between confrontation naming and gray matter volume revealed distinct patterns in each FTD subgroup. SD patients showed a significant correlation in the left lateral temporal cortex, PNFA patients in several left frontal regions, and NON-APH patients in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These findings suggest that confrontation naming is supported by a large-scale neural network, and that naming is compromised in FTD due to interruption of the network in several different ways.

Studies of semantic memory in probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) have focused on the degradation of semantic knowledge, but other work in AD suggests an impairment in the semantic categorization processes that operate on this knowledge. We examined the categorization of object descriptions, where semantic category membership judgments were based on rule-based or similarity-based categorization processes. We found that AD patients were selectively limited in their semantic categorization under conditions requiring a rule-based approach. However, AD patients did not differ from healthy seniors under conditions based on judgments of overall similarity. We showed that this was not due to nonspecific or overall task-related difficulty associatedwith the rule condition by asking the subjects to use similarity-based judgments of perceptually degraded versions of the stimuli. The results of this condition did not differ from other similarity-based judgments but did differ from the rule-based condition in AD. Rule-based judgments of semantic category membership correlated with executive measures of inhibitory control and mental search, but not with measures of episodic memory or overall dementia severity, suggesting a contribution of executive resources to rule-based semantic categorization. Moreover, the pattern of limited rule-based categorization in AD closely resembled the performance profile of patients with frontotemporal dementia, further implying that executive resource limitations underlie AD patients' limited rule-based semantic categorization. These findings suggest that semantic memory difficulty in AD is due in part to a deficit in executive processes that are central to rule-based categorization in semantic memory.