In the following series of experiments, effects of morphine (0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg) and naloxone (0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg) were assessed in nondeprived rats trained to leverpress with 10% ethanol, sweetened ethanol, or 5% sucrose and water as the reinforcers. Morphine, at doses of 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg had little effect on responding with ethanol or sweetened ethanol available on a fixed ratio 4 (FR4) schedule of reinforcement, but at the 3.0 mg/kg dose, morphine suppressed responding to near zero. Similar results were obtained when 10% ethanol and water were available on a concurrent FR4 FR4 schedule of reinforcement. When 5% sucrose and water were available concurrently, morphine suppressed responding at 3.0 and 10 mg/kg. Naloxone (0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg) decreased responding for ethanol, sweetened ethanol, and sucrose solutions in a dose-dependent manner. Naloxone decreased total number of responses/session by shortening the duration of responding without affecting momentary rate. Overall, the data suggest that the endogenous opioid system plays a role in the ability of ethanol to reinforce operant behavior. However, this role does not appear to be specific to ethanol because similar results were observed with sucrose reinforcement. Failure to find enhanced ethanol intakes following morphine injections in the operant situation suggests that the method used to measure ethanol self-administration makes a difference in assessing the effects of drugs on ethanol intake.
Rats from the alcohol preferring (P) line developed at Indiana University were initiated to self-administer ethanol orally without food or water restriction using either a sucrose-fading or a secondary-conditioning procedure. Following initiation, they were tested under a variety of operant conditions to examine the ability of ethanol to reinforce lever pressing behavior. Regardless of initiation procedure, the animals maintained lever pressing behavior with ethanol reinforcement, even at ethanol concentrations as high as 40% (v/v). Slightly higher daily session intakes (g/kg) were found at the higher ethanol concentrations following the secondary-conditioning initiation procedure compared with the sucrose-fading technique. When both ethanol and water were concurrently available, the rats showed a high preference for ethanol reinforcement. When varying concentrations of sucrose were substituted for water, the amount of ethanol ingested decreased as the concentration of the alternative sucrose increased. However, if the response requirement for the sucrose was substantially greater than that for ethanol, the rats shifted their responding to the lever associated with ethanol presentation. The results are discussed in relation to prior work using similar procedures with Long-Evans non-selected rats and with the alcohol non-preferring (NP) rat line.
Rats were exposed to a conditioning procedure that varied the duration of overlap between a light-noise conditioned stimulus (CS) and the effects of a morphine (5 mg/kg) unconditioned stimulus (US). Three paired (P) groups differed in CS duration (5, 15, or 60 min) but had the same CS-US interval (30 s). A control group (U) received explicitly unpaired presentations of CS and US. P groups showed CS-specific attenuation of the bradycardic response and enhancement of the hyperthermic response to morphine. During placebo tests, the CS elicited conditioned increases in heart rate and body temperature in Groups P15 and P60. Group P5 showed a conditioned increase in heart rate but not in body temperature. Overall, strength of conditioning was directly related to CS duration. These data indicate that duration of overlap between a CS and drug-induced changes in a target response system is an important determinant of Pavlovian drug conditioning.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.