The adenosine receptor system, which mediates the psychoactive effects of caffeine, is also thought to be involved in the regulation of anxiety. In this study, we examined the association between variations in anxiogenic responses to caffeine and polymorphisms in the A1 and A2a adenosine receptor genes. Healthy, infrequent caffeine users (N=94) recorded their subjective mood states following a 150 mg oral dose of caffeine freebase or placebo in a double-blind study. We found a significant association between self-reported anxiety after caffeine administration and two linked polymorphisms on the A2a receptor gene, the 1976C>T and 2592C>Tins polymorphisms. Individuals with the 1976T/T and the 2592Tins/Tins genotypes reported greater increases in anxiety after caffeine administration than the other genotypic groups. The study shows that an adenosine receptor gene polymorphism that has been associated with Panic Disorder is also associated with anxiogenic responses to an acute dose of caffeine.
A deficit in prepulse inhibition (PPI) can be one of the clinically observed features of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that is seen long after the acute traumatic episode has terminated. Thus, reduced PPI may represent an enduring psychophysiological marker of this illness in some patients. PPI is an operational measure of sensorimotor gating and refers to the phenomenon in which a weak stimulus presented immediately before an intense startling stimulus inhibits the magnitude of the subsequent startle response. The effects of stress on PPI have been relatively understudied, and in particular, there is very little information on PPI effects of ethologically relevant psychological stressors. We aimed to develop a paradigm for evaluating stress-induced sensorimotor gating abnormalities by comparing the effects of a purely psychological stressor (predator exposure) to those of a noiciceptive physical stressor (footshock) on PPI and baseline startle responses in rats over an extended period of time following stressor presentation. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed (within a protective cage) to ferrets for 5 min or left in their homecage and then tested for PPI immediately, 24h, 48h, and 9 days after the exposure. The effects of footshock were evaluated in a separate set of rats. The effects seen with stressor presentation were compared to that elicited by corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF; 0.5 and 3μg/ 6μl, intracerebroventricularly). Finally, the effects of these stressors and CRF administration on plasma corticosterone were measured. PPI was disrupted 24h after ferret exposure; in contrast, footshock failed to affect PPI at any time. CRF mimicked the predator stress profile, with the low dose producing a PPI deficit 24h after infusion. Interestingly, the high dose also produced a PPI deficit 24h after infusion, but with this dose, the PPI deficit was evident even 9d later. Plasma corticosterone levels were elevated acutely (before PPI deficits emerged) by both stressors and CRF, but returned to normal control levels 24h later, when PPI deficits were present. Thus, predator exposure produces a delayed disruption of PPI, and stimulation of CRF receptors recapitulates these effects. Contemporaneous HPA axis activation is neither necessary nor sufficient for these PPI deficits. These results indicate that predator exposure, perhaps acting through CRF, may model the delayed-onset and persistent sensorimotor gating abnormalities that
Prepulse inhibition (PPI) refers to the reduction in the startle response when a startling stimulus is preceded by a weak prestimulus, and is an endophenotype of deficient sensorimotor gating in several neuropsychiatric disorders. Emerging evidence suggests that norepinephrine (NE) regulates PPI, however, the circuitry involved is unknown. We found recently that stimulation of the locus coeruleus (LC), the primary source of NE to the forebrain, induces a PPI deficit that is a result of downstream NE release. Hence, this study sought to identify LC-innervated forebrain regions that mediate this effect. Separate groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats received a cocktail solution of the a1-NE receptor agonist phenylephrine plus the b-receptor agonist isoproterenol (equal parts of each; 0, 3, 10, and 30 mg) into subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), nucleus accumbens (NAcc), extended amygdala, mediodorsal thalamus (MD-thalamus), or the dorsal hippocampus (DH) before PPI testing. NE agonist infusion into the posterior mPFC, NAcc shell, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, basolateral amygdala, and the MD-thalamus disrupted PPI, with particularly strong effects in MD-thalamus. Sites in which NE receptor stimulation did not disrupt PPI (anterior mPFC, NAcc core, central amygdala, and DH) did support PPI disruptions with the dopamine D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (0, 10 mg). This pattern reveals new pathways in the regulation of PPI, and suggests that NE transmission within distinct thalamocortical and ventral forebrain networks may subserve the sensorimotor gating deficits that are seen in disorders such as schizophrenia, Tourette syndrome, and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Prepulse inhibition (PPI) refers to the attenuation of startle when a weak prestimulus precedes the startling stimulus. PPI is deficient in several psychiatric illnesses involving poor sensorimotor gating. Previous studies indicate that a1 adrenergic receptors regulate PPI, yet the extent to which these effects are mediated by central vs peripheral receptors is unclear. The present studies compared the effects of intracerebroventricular (ICV) vs intraperitoneal (IP) delivery of several a1 receptor agonists on PPI. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received either cirazoline (0, 10, 25, 50 mg/5 ml), methoxamine (0, 30, 100 mg/5 ml), or phenylephrine (0, 3, 10, 30 mg/5 ml) ICV immediately before testing. Separate groups received either cirazoline (0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 mg/kg), methoxamine (0, 2, 5, 10 mg/kg), or phenylephrine (0, 0.1, 2.0 mg/kg) IP 5 min before testing. PPI, baseline startle responses, and piloerection, an index of autonomic arousal, were measured. Cirazoline disrupted PPI; effective ICV doses were approximately six times lower than effective IP doses. Methoxamine disrupted PPI after ICV infusion but failed to affect PPI with IP doses that were up to 30-fold higher than the effective ICV dose. Phenylephrine disrupted PPI with ICV administration, but did not alter PPI after IP injection of even a 20-fold higher dose. None of the ICV treatments altered baseline startle magnitude, but phenylephrine and methoxamine lowered startle after administration of high systemic doses. Piloerection was induced by cirazoline via either route of administration, and by IP methoxamine and phenylephrine, but not by ICV infusion of methoxamine or phenylephrine. These findings indicate that a1 receptor-mediated PPI disruption occurs exclusively through stimulation of central receptors and is dissociable from alterations in baseline startle or autonomic effects.
To investigate the role of corticolimbic input in modulating feeding-related nucleus accumbens (Acb) circuitry, researchers temporarily deactivated sites within the basolateral amygdaloid complex (BLA) or central amygdaloid region (CeA) via GABA(A) agonist (muscimol) infusions and measured feeding responses following muscimol infusions into the Acb shell. Hyperphagia elicited by intra-Acb shell muscimol was not altered by coinfusions of intra-BLA muscimol. In contrast, muscimol infusions into the CeA dose-dependently reduced feeding elicited either by intra-Acb shell GABA(A) receptor stimulation or by food deprivation and produced a syndrome of forepaw treading. Intra-CeA tetrodotoxin infusions also blocked intra-Acb shell muscimol-induced hyperphagia. Hence, feeding elicited by intra-Acb shell GABA(A) receptor stimulation requires intact neural output from the CeA but not the BLA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.