Background: There is some uncertainty whether prior use of antiplatelet (AP) drugs increases the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) and influences functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Objective: To assess whether prior use of AP drugs is related to outcome following intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy in patients with ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Patients: A single-center prospective observational cohort study of the relation between prior AP therapy, occurrence of SICH, and functional outcome of consecutive patients with ischemic stroke undergoing intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in a university hospital between April 1, 2002, and November 30, 2006. Main Outcome Measures: The occurrence of SICH and favorable outcome reflecting independence defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 2 or lower at 3 months. Results: Of the 301 patients who received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, 89 used AP drugs prior to thrombolysis. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 12 patients (13.5%; 95% confidence interval, 7.8%-22.3%) who had received AP drugs and in 6 patients (2.8%; 95% confidence interval, 1.2%-6.2%) without prior AP therapy (P = .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that prior AP therapy was an independent predictor of SICH (odds ratio, 6.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-17.1). Nonetheless, prior AP therapy was independently associated with a favorable outcome (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-4.3). Conclusion: Despite a higher incidence of SICH, the net benefit of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy for acute ischemic stroke was greater in patients using AP drugs.
High admission triglyceride levels were independently associated with a higher risk of sICH, but were not associated with a reduced chance of a favourable functional outcome at 3 months. Total cholesterol levels, LDL levels and statin use had no influence on both the occurrence of sICH or functional outcome.
Background: Preliminary findings suggest that statins may have a neuroprotective effect in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. This study investigated whether patients prior on statin therapy and treated with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute ischaemic stroke have a better functional outcome than statin-naïve patients. Methods: In a prospective observational cohort study of 476 acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with tPA we investigated the relationship between prior statin use and functional outcome at 3 months, the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (SICH) and early in-hospital mortality. Ischaemic stroke subtypes were defined according to the TOAST classification. Favourable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. Results: Of the 476 patients included, 98 (20.6%) used a statin at stroke presentation. In the entire cohort, 45.6% of patients had a favourable outcome with no difference between patients with or without statin therapy (45.9 vs. 45.5%, p = 0.94). In the multivariable analysis, statin use was not associated with favourable outcome (OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.6–1.9, p = 0.87). In none of the different stroke subtype groups was statin use associated with favourable outcome. Finally, statin use was not an independent risk factor of SICH or of early in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: Prior statin therapy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke treated with tPA is not associated with a more favourable outcome, and this is independent of stroke subtype.
A case of a 51-year-old woman with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) without an associative cause is reported. Initially the diagnosis primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) was considered. Both diagnosis are rare and can mimic each other. Distinction between both can be difficult, but is necessary because of different treatment options. Clinical features and diagnostic assessments to distinguish RCVS from PACNS and the potential pitfalls are discussed.
Pheochromocytomas (PCC) and paragangliomas (PGL) are rare neuroendocrine tumors that arise in the adrenal medulla and in extra-adrenal locations, such as the head, neck, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. Classification of these tumors into those with or without metastatic potential on the basis of gross or microscopic features is challenging. Recent insights and scoring systems have attempted to develop solutions for this, as described in the latest World Health Organization (WHO) edition on endocrine tumor pathology. PCC and PGL are amongst the tumors most frequently accompanied by germline mutations. More than 20 genes are responsible for a hereditary background in up to 40% of these tumors; somatic mutations in the same and several additional genes form the basis for another 30%. However, this does not allow for a complete understanding of the pathogenesis or targeted treatment of PCC and PGL, for which surgery is the primary treatment and for which metastasis is associated with poor outcome. This review describes recent insights into the cell of origin of these tumors, the latest developments with regard to the genetic background, and the current status of tumor classification including proposed scoring systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.