The phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is one of the major pathways modulating cell growth, proliferation, metabolism, survival, and angiogenesis. Hyperactivation of this pathway is one of the most frequent occurrences in human cancer and is thus an obvious target for treatment of this disease. Currently there are 26 novel compounds targeting the PI3K pathway being assessed in more than 150 cancer-related clinical trials. Although this pathway is involved in many vital biologic functions, data emanating from these clinical trials indicate that these drugs are well tolerated. This review outlines the interaction of the PI3K pathway with other signaling cascades, highlights mechanisms involved in hyperactivation, discusses current therapeutics in cancer-related clinical trials that target this pathway, and, based on preclinical data, discusses possible leads on patient selection and combinational therapy, including targeting multiple components of the associated signaling network.

To evaluate the potential roles that both receptors and enzymes play in corticosteroid regulation of intestinal function, we have determined glucocorticoid receptor (GR), mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11β-HSD) expression in intestinal epithelial cells. GR and MR mRNA and receptor binding were ubiquitously expressed in epithelial cells, with receptor levels higher in ileum and colon than jejunum and duodenum. RNase protection analysis showed that 11β-HSD1 was not expressed in intestinal epithelial cells, and enzyme activity studies detected no 11-reductase activity. 11β-HSD2 mRNA and protein were demonstrated in ileal and colonic epithelia; both MR and GR binding increased when enzyme activity was inhibited with carbenoxolone. Duodenal and jejunal epithelial cells showed very little 11β-HSD2 mRNA and undetectable 11β-HSD2 protein; despite minor (<7%) dehydrogenase activity in these cells, enzyme activity did not alter binding of corticosterone to either MR or GR. These findings demonstrate the ubiquitous but differential expression of MR and GR in intestinal epithelia and that 11β-HSD2 modulates corticosteroid binding to both MR and GR in ileum and proximal and distal colon but not in duodenum or jejunum.

The Johnstone laboratory receives research support from Roche, BMS, Astra-Zeneca and MecRx. RWJ is a scientific consultant and shareholder in MecRx. The McArthur laboratory receives non-financial support from Pfizer Oncology for supply of palbociclib.Research.

No abstract

BackgroundMelanoma brain metastases (MBMs) are a challenging clinical problem with high morbidity and mortality. Although first-line dabrafenib–trametinib and ipilimumab–nivolumab have similar intracranial response rates (50%–55%), central nervous system (CNS) resistance to BRAF-MEK inhibitors (BRAF-MEKi) usually occurs around 6 months, and durable responses are only seen with combination immunotherapy. We sought to investigate the utility of ipilimumab–nivolumab after MBM progression on BRAF-MEKi and identify mechanisms of resistance.MethodsPatients who received first-line ipilimumab–nivolumab for MBMs or second/third line ipilimumab–nivolumab for intracranial metastases with BRAFV600 mutations with prior progression on BRAF-MEKi and MRI brain staging from March 1, 2015 to June 30, 2018 were included. Modified intracranial RECIST was used to assess response. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of BRAFV600 mutant MBMs that were naïve to systemic treatment (n=18) or excised after progression on BRAF-MEKi (n=14) underwent whole transcriptome sequencing. Comparative analyses of MBMs naïve to systemic treatment versus BRAF-MEKi progression were performed.ResultsTwenty-five and 30 patients who received first and second/third line ipilimumab–nivolumab, were included respectively. Median sum of MBM diameters was 13 and 20.5 mm for the first and second/third line ipilimumab–nivolumab groups, respectively. Intracranial response rate was 75.0% (12/16), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 41.6 months for first-line ipilimumab–nivolumab. Efficacy of second/third line ipilimumab-nivolumab after BRAF-MEKi progression was poor with an intracranial response rate of 4.8% (1/21) and median PFS of 1.3 months. Given the poor activity of ipilimumab–nivolumab after BRAF-MEKi MBM progression, we performed whole transcriptome sequencing to identify mechanisms of drug resistance. We identified a set of 178 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between naïve and MBMs with progression on BRAF-MEKi treatment (p value <0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) <0.1). No distinct pathways were identified from gene set enrichment analyses using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Gene Ontogeny or Hallmark libraries; however, enrichment of DEG from the Innate Anti-PD1 Resistance Signature (IPRES) was identified (p value=0.007, FDR=0.03).ConclusionsSecond-line ipilimumab–nivolumab for MBMs after BRAF-MEKi progression has poor activity. MBMs that are resistant to BRAF-MEKi that also conferred resistance to second-line ipilimumab–nivolumab showed enrichment of the IPRES gene signature.

8520 Background: Activation of CDK4 by amplification, increased expression of Cyclin D1 (CCND1) or reduced expression of the CDK inhibitor p16 (CDKN2A) can contribute to transformation of melanocytes indicating that CDK4 can act as an oncogene in melanoma.To explore if CDK4 may be a viable target for the treatment of human melanoma we have analyzed the frequency and clinico-pathological associations of genomic alterations of the CDK4 pathway in primary human melanoma and examined the genomic predictors of sensitivity to the highly selective CDK4/6 inhibitor PD 0332991 (991) in a panel of melanoma cell lines. Methods: A series of 167 primary melanomas with clinical, molecular and pathological annotation, including median follow up of 6.6 years, were analyzed for copy number variation (CNV)- gain of CDK4 or CCND1 (average gene copy >2.4) or loss of CDKN2A (average gene copy <1.4), by fluorescence in situ hybridization. A panel of 39 cell lines were treated with 991 in vitro and GI50s calculated. The mean GI50 of the melanoma cell lines was used to define sensitivity. Gene expression profiling and mutation or CNV in CDKN2A were used to identify predictors of sensitivity. Results: 75% of primary melanomas had at least one CNV (75%, 70% and 82% for BRAF, NRAS or wild-type BRAF/NRAS mutation status respectively). 55% showed loss of CDKN2A. 28% of melanomas had two or more CNVs. Melanomas with two or more CNVs involving CCND1 had worse overall survival (HR 5.56, p=0.02). Low CDKN2A mRNA expression or mutation or loss of CDKN2A predicted sensitivity to 991 with 30/33 mutant/loss lines being sensitive compared to only 2/6 wild type lines (p<0.006). Expression of CDK4, CCND1 or other cyclins or CDK-inhibitors did not predict sensitivity to 991. Conclusions: Genomic alterations in the CDK4 pathway are frequent in melanoma and are associated with worse survival, particularly when melanomas harbor two or more CNVs involving CCND1. Mutation, loss or low expression of CDKN2A in melanoma cell lines predicted sensitivity to the CDK4 inhibitor 991. Taken together these data support evaluation of CDK4 inhibitors in melanoma and suggest that CDKN2A maybe a genomic predictor of sensitivity to these agents.

No abstract

Limited effective therapeutic options are available for patients with recurrent highgrade serous carcinoma (HGSC), the most common histological subtype accounting for the majority of ovarian cancer deaths. We have shown efficacy in poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor-resistant HGSC for the RNA Polymerase I (Pol I) transcription inhibitor CX-5461 through its ability to activate a nucleolar-associated DNA damage response (DDR). Here, we screen the protein-coding genome to identify potential targets whose inhibition enhances the efficacy of CX-5461. We identify a network of cooperating inhibitory interactions, including components of homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair and DNA topoisomerase 1 (TOP1). We highlight that CX-5461 combined with topotecan, a TOP1 inhibitor used as salvage therapy in HGSC, induces robust cell cycle arrest and cell death in a panel of HRproficient HGSC cell lines. The combination potentiates a nucleolar-associated DDR via recruitment of phosphorylated replication protein A (RPA) and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related protein (ATR). CX-5461 plus low-dose topotecan cooperate to potently inhibit xenograft tumour growth, indicating the potential for this strategy to improve salvage therapeutic regimens to treat HGSC.