Increasing antimicrobial resistance and medical device-related infections have led to a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative or adjunct to conventional antimicrobials. Expanded access and compassionate use cases have risen exponentially but have varied widely in approach, methodology, clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered, dosing, route of administration, and outcomes. Large gaps in knowledge contribute to a heterogeneity in approach and lack of clear consensus in many important clinical areas. Here, the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) has convened a panel of experts in phage therapy, clinical microbiology, infectious diseases, and pharmacology, who worked with regulatory experts and a funding agency to identify questions based on a clinical framework and divided them into three themes: potential clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered, and laboratory testing and pharmacokinetic considerations. Suggestions are provided as answers to a series of questions intended to inform clinicians considering experimental phage therapy for patients in their clinical practices.

Overall lymph node harvest, in this unit, varied according to the reporting pathologist but not operating surgeon. As lymph node harvest increased to 15 per patient, the probability of identifying a metastatic node increased.

No abstract

Background: Immunomodulatory strategies in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) include the use of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). The optimal application of these therapies is unknown and outcomes data are limited. We investigated treatment categories and laboratory and clinical outcomes of IVIG and/or TPE in HIT with a systematic literature review. Study Design and Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science through December 2019 for studies combining controlled vocabulary and keywords related to thrombocytopenia, heparin, TPE, and IVIG. The primary outcome was treatment indication. Secondary outcomes were platelet recovery, HIT laboratory parameters, heparin re-exposure, and post-treatment course. Case-level data were analyzed by qualitative synthesis. Results: After 4241 references were screened, we identified 60 studies with four main categories of IVIG and/or TPE use as follows: (a) treatment of refractory HIT (n = 35; 31%); (b) initial therapy (n = 45; 40%); (c) cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB; n = 30; 27%); and (d) other (n = 2; 2%). IVIG was most commonly used for the treatment of refractory HIT while TPE was primarily used to facilitate heparin exposure during CPB. Both IVIG and TPE were

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) alters the hemostatic balance. Contributing to TPE's hemostatic effects is the mechanical processing of blood in the extracorporeal circuit, circuit anticoagulant, type of replacement fluid, TPE schedule and number of procedures, TPE timing relative to invasive procedures, and removal of nontargeted components such as platelets, coagulation proteins, and cytokines. Although TPE's hemostatic effects are well established, how it impacts the bleeding risk is not clearly understood. In this concise review, we describe the effects of the above TPE‐related factors on hemostatic balance, present data on the effects of TPE on blood hemostasis, including its effects on platelet counts and clotting assays, and review the literature on the impact of TPE‐induced hemostatic changes on TPE‐associated bleeding events. Finally, we discuss risk factors associated with bleeding during TPE and review the literature on TPE‐associated hemostatic effects in the pediatric population.