No abstract

Objective To evaluate ultrashort time to echo (UTE) magnetic resonance (MR) morphology of the cartilaginous endplates (CEP) in cadaveric lumbar spines with bony vertebral endplate (VEP) lesions, to determine inter-reader agreement as well as associations between the CEP morphology and VEP lesions as well as other abnormalities. Materials and Methods MR imaging of cadaveric lumbar spines from 10 donors was performed at 3T using a UTE MR sequence. Two musculoskeletal radiologists identified the location of vertebral endplate lesions in consensus. The morphology of the CEP overlying the lesions and in the adjacent normal regions was assessed individually. A total of 55 vertebral lesions and 55 normal regions were assessed. The presence of osteophytosis, morphological changes of the anterior and posterior longitudinal ligament, and intervertebral disc signal and morphology was also assessed. Agreement between observers was determined using Cohen's kappa analysis, and association between CEP and vertebral endplate lesions was determined using chi square test. Results 55 vertebral endplate lesions were identified and the morphology of CEP evaluated by two readers was in substantial agreement with Cohen's kappa of 0.78. The presence of vertebral endplate abnormality was associated with the presence of osteophytes (39 out of 55 levels), altered morphology and signal of the anterior longitudinal ligament (23 out of 55 levels) and intervertebral discs (30 out of 55 levels). Conclusion UTE MRI enables evaluation of the CEP with substantial inter-reader agreement. Abnormal changes of the CEP may facilitate formation of lesions of vertebral endplate over time and are associated with degenerative changes of the lumbar spine.

Acute injuries to the ankle are frequently encountered in the setting of the emergency room, sport, and general practice. This ACR Appropriateness Criteria defines best practices for imaging evaluation for several variants of patients presenting with acute ankle trauma. The variants include scenarios when Ottawa Rules can be evaluated, when there are exclusionary criteria, when Ottawa Rules cannot be evaluated, as well as specific injuries. Clinical scenarios are followed by the imaging choices and their appropriateness with an accompanying narrative explanation to help physicians to order the most appropriate imaging test.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Over the last decade, the number of shoulder arthroplasty procedures has been increasing and evolving. The types of prostheses have also been evolving, and familiarity with the various design types will assist in postoperative assessment for hardware complications. New preoperative planning tools are available that have radically changed the protocol of preoperative image studies performed. This article reviews the main types of shoulder prostheses, discusses radiologic studies required before surgery, and describes the common complications of shoulder arthroplasty.

Developments and improvements in knowledge are rapid and ongoing in both the radiologic and rheumatologic fields. During the past decade, the roles of imaging and the radiologist in the assessment and management of many inflammatory rheumatologic diseases have undergone several changes. To remain effective in patient care, the radiologist needs to be aware of these changes when recommending and interpreting imaging examinations for the referring physician. The goal of contemporary rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management is to redefine RA as a disease that is no longer characterized by erosions, which reflect established or long-standing untreated disease. Most cases of RA are now diagnosed clinically, but imaging increases diagnostic confidence, is superior to clinical examination for the detection of joint inflammation, and plays an important role in patient management. The concept of the seronegative spondyloarthritides has recently been redefined by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS). This new set of ASAS classification criteria divides the spectrum of spondyloarthritis on the basis of predominantly axial skeletal clinical manifestations or predominantly peripheral skeletal clinical manifestations. For axial spondyloarthritis, magnetic resonance imaging and radiography play crucial roles for classification and diagnosis. For both peripheral spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis, the radiologist can provide important information that influences classification and diagnosis, including documenting radiologic evidence of juxta-articular new bone formation, diagnosing sacroiliitis, or delineating the presence and extent of enthesitis and dactylitis. The radiologist's familiarity with recent classification criteria, in addition to the traditional diagnostic characteristics of the individual inflammatory arthritides, maximizes the productive interface between the radiologist and the rheumatologist. RSNA, 2016.

Trigger finger (or trigger thumb), also known as sclerosing tenosynovitis, is a common clinical diagnosis that rarely presents for imaging. Because of this selection bias, many radiologists may not be familiar with the process. Furthermore, patients who do present for imaging frequently have misleading examination indications. To our knowledge, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings of trigger thumb have not been previously reported in the literature. In this article, we review the entity of trigger thumb, the anatomy involved, and associated imaging findings, which include flexor pollicis longus tendinosis with a distinct nodule, A1 pulley thickening, and tenosynovitis. In addition, in some cases, an abnormal Av pulley is apparent. In the rare cases of trigger finger that present for MR imaging, accurate diagnosis by the radiologist can allow initiation of treatment and avoid further unnecessary workup.

Acute trauma to the knee is a common presentation seen in the emergency department. After a routine clinical examination, imaging is frequently performed to facilitate the diagnosis and almost always starts with radiographs. If clinically indicated, advanced cross-sectional imaging may then be performed for further evaluation. CT is often performed for preoperative planning of the complex tibial plateau and distal femur fractures. Currently, MRI is the study of choice for evaluation of bone marrow, internal derangements, and other soft-tissue injuries about the knee joint. In patients with knee dislocations, MR angiography may be performed simultaneously with MRI for evaluation of internal derangements and vascular injuries with less morbidity compared to conventional angiography.

An 80-year-old male patient with a history of renal cell carcinoma presented to his primary care physician with a painless lump in his left upper extremity. Physical examination revealed a 3-cm nonmobile, nontender soft-tissue mass in the left forearm. Radiographs showed an abnormal soft tissue contour along the posterolateral aspect of the mid forearm without underlying osseous changes (Fig. 1). An ultrasound of the posterior aspect of the mid forearm revealed a well-defined, hypoechoic lesion with intrinsic blood flow, posterior acoustic enhancement, and a thin echogenic rim surrounding the lesion, consistent with a split fat sign (Fig. 2). Echogenic structures were observed entering and exiting the mass (Fig. 3), suggestive of an enlarged posterior interosseous nerve (normal ultrasound appearance of the posterior interosseous nerve is provided for comparison in Fig. 4). A nerve block of the posterior interosseous nerve was performed, followed by an ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy of the mass. Pathology showed Antoni A and Antoni B architectural patterns on hematoxylin-eosin stain (Fig. 5).