SUMMARY Genome editing by RNA‐guided nucleases, such as SpCas9, has been used in numerous different plant species. However, to what extent multiple independent loci can be targeted simultaneously by multiplexing has not been well documented. Here, we developed a toolkit, based on a highly intron‐optimized zCas9i gene, which allows assembly of nuclease constructs expressing up to 32 single guide RNAs (sgRNAs). We used this toolkit to explore the limits of multiplexing in two major model species, and report on the isolation of transgene‐free octuple (8×) Nicotiana benthamiana and duodecuple (12×) Arabidopsis thaliana mutant lines in a single generation (T1 and T2, respectively). We developed novel counter‐selection markers for N. benthamiana, most importantly Sl‐FAST2, comparable to the well‐established Arabidopsis seed fluorescence marker, and FCY‐UPP, based on the production of toxic 5‐fluorouracil in the presence of a precursor. Targeting eight genes with an array of nine different sgRNAs and relying on FCY‐UPP for selection of non‐transgenic T1, we identified N. benthamiana mutant lines with astonishingly high efficiencies: All analyzed plants carried mutations in all genes (approximately 112/116 target sites edited). Furthermore, we targeted 12 genes by an array of 24 sgRNAs in A. thaliana. Efficiency was significantly lower in A. thaliana, and our results indicate Cas9 availability is the limiting factor in such higher‐order multiplexing applications. We identified a duodecuple mutant line by a combination of phenotypic screening and amplicon sequencing. The resources and results presented provide new perspectives for how multiplexing can be used to generate complex genotypes or to functionally interrogate groups of candidate genes.

SummaryGenome editing by RNA-guided nucleases in model species is still hampered by low efficiencies, and isolation of transgene-free individuals often requires tedious PCR screening. Here, we present a toolkit that mitigates these drawbacks for Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis thaliana. The toolkit is based on an intron-optimized SpCas9-coding gene (zCas9i), which conveys dramatically enhanced editing efficiencies. The zCas9i gene is combined with remaining components of the genome editing system in recipient vectors, which lack only the user-defined guide RNA transcriptional units. Up to 32 guide RNA transcriptional units can be introduced to these recipients by a simple and PCR-free cloning strategy, with the choice of three different RNA polymerase III promoters for guide RNA expression. We developed new markers to aid transgene counter-selection in N. benthamiana, and demonstrate their efficacy for isolation of several genome-edited N. benthamiana lines. In Arabidopsis, we explore the limits of multiplexing by simultaneously targeting 12 genes by 24 sgRNAs. Perhaps surprisingly, the limiting factor in such higher order multiplexing applications is Cas9 availability, rather than recombination or silencing of repetitive sgRNA TU arrays. Through a combination of phenotypic screening and pooled amplicon sequencing, we identify transgene-free duodecuple mutant Arabidopsis plants directly in the T2 generation. This demonstrates high efficiency of the zCas9i gene, and reveals new perspectives for multiplexing to target gene families and to generate higher order mutants.

Heterodimeric complexes incorporating the lipase-like proteins EDS1 with PAD4 or SAG101 are central hubs in plant innate immunity. EDS1 functions encompass signal relay from TIR domain-containing intracellular NLR-type immune receptors (TNLs) towards RPW8-type helper NLRs (RNLs) and, in Arabidopsis thaliana, bolstering of signaling and resistance mediated by cell-surface pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Increasing evidence points to the activation of EDS1 complexes by small molecule binding.We used CRISPR/Cas-generated mutant lines and agroinfiltration-based complementation assays to interrogate functions of EDS1 complexes in Nicotiana benthamiana.We did not detect impaired PRR signaling in N. benthamiana lines deficient in EDS1 complexes or RNLs. Intriguingly, in assays monitoring functions of SlEDS1-NbEDS1 complexes in N. benthamiana, mutations within the SlEDS1 catalytic triad could abolish or enhance TNL immunity. Furthermore, nuclear EDS1 accumulation was sufficient for N. benthamiana TNL (Roq1) immunity.Reinforcing PRR signaling in Arabidopsis might be a derived function of the TNL/EDS1 immune sector. Although Solanaceae EDS1 functionally depends on catalytic triad residues in some contexts, our data do not support binding of a TNL-derived small molecule in the triad environment. Whether and how nuclear EDS1 activity connects to membrane pore-forming RNLs remains unknown.

SummaryHeterodimeric complexes incorporating the lipase-like proteins EDS1 with PAD4 or SAG101 are central hubs in plant innate immunity. EDS1 functions encompass signal relay from TIR domain-containing intracellular NLR-type immune receptors (TNLs) towards RPW8-type helper NLRs (RNLs) and, in A. thaliana, bolstering of signaling and resistance mediated by cell-surface pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Biochemical activities underlying these mechanistic frameworks remain unknown.We used CRISPR/Cas-generated mutant lines and agroinfiltration-based complementation assays to interrogate functions of EDS1 complexes in N. benthamiana.We do not detect impaired PRR signaling in N. benthamiana lines deficient in EDS1 complexes or RNLs. Intriguingly, mutations within the catalytic triad of Solanaceae EDS1 can abolish or enhance TNL immunity in N. benthamiana. Furthermore, nuclear EDS1 accumulation is sufficient for N. benthamiana TNL (Roq1) immunity.Reinforcing PRR signaling in Arabidopsis might be a derived function of the TNL/EDS1 immune sector. Dependency of Solanaceae but not A. thaliana EDS1 on catalytic triad residues raises the possibility that a TNL-derived small molecule binds to the Solanaceae EDS1 lipase-like domain, and that EDS1 lipase-like domain pocket contributions to TNL immune responses vary between lineages. Whether and how nuclear EDS1 activity connects to membrane pore-forming RNLs remains unknown.