Research demonstrates that psychological factors are important for positive transplant outcomes, though there is little literature that synthesizes these factors in a comprehensive model among pediatric kidney transplant patients. This review analyzes psychological and psychosocial factors related to medical outcomes and overall well‐being post‐transplant by utilizing the PPPHM and referencing the existing literature on risk and resilience. Pediatric kidney transplant recipients are more susceptible to mental health concerns such as depression, anxiety, and ADHD, as well as developmental and neurocognitive delays, compared to healthy peers. Complex medical care and psychosocial needs for patients have implications for family functioning, parental and sibling mental health, and youth readiness to transition to adult care. It is important to carefully monitor patient functioning with empirically validated tools and to intervene in a multidisciplinary setting as early as possible to identify patients at risk and reduce potential negative impact. Psychologists are uniquely trained to assess and address these issues and are a valuable component of multidisciplinary, culturally competent care. While research in this expansive field is improving, more data are needed to establish gold standard approaches to mental health and psychosocial care in this population.

This research examines a model of how personality (Five-Factor Model) is related to adjustment to cancer in later life in terms of the presence of continuing cancer-related worry and depression among older adult, long-term cancer survivors. Data from an NCI-funded study with 275 older adult (age 60+), long-term (5+ years) survivors of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer were examined. Regression analyses identified neuroticism as the strongest predictor of cancer-related worry along with continuing cancer-related symptoms. For depression, three personality dimensions (neuroticism, conscientiousness, and agreeableness) were significant predictors. Findings suggest the importance of considering the central role that survivors' personality characteristics play in understanding cancer-related worries and depression. Understanding these dispositional characteristics is key for social workers and health-care practitioners in counseling survivors experiencing these common mental health effects.

Background Delayed time to listing (TTL) for pediatric transplant patients is associated with increased risks of mortality and morbidity. The full range of health disparities, sociodemographic factors, and other barriers associated with delays in listing in the pediatric transplant candidate evaluation process has not been fully examined. Methods Retrospective chart reviews were conducted for 183 kidney, liver, and heart transplant candidates ages 0–18 who were referred for evaluation during 2012–2015. Demographic information and potential barriers (e g., social/medical factors, financial concerns) were gathered from pre‐transplant evaluations and included in a comprehensive model to evaluate mechanisms that explain differences in TTL. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression models, Cox proportional hazards models, and path analysis were used for analyses. Results Candidates included 26.8% heart, 33.3% liver, and 39.9% kidney patients. The most common barrier to listing was financial (71.6%), followed by caregiver psychological or substance use (57.9%), and medical problems (49.7%). Higher age, kidney, and liver organ type (relative to the heart), and presence of social, medical, administrative/motivation, and financial barriers were all directly associated with longer TTL. Public insurance was indirectly associated with TTL through social, administrative/motivation, and financial barriers. Organ type was indirectly associated with TTL through financial barriers. Conclusions Results suggest social problems, administrative issues, and financial issues act as mechanisms through which insurance type and liver transplant candidates face increased risk of delays in transplant listing time. There are numerous clinical implications and interventions that are warranted to reduce TTL among pediatric transplant candidates with co‐occurring barriers.

Rates of the demand for transplantation continue to rise and exceed the supply of available organs. 1 To maximize the successful transplantation of a limited number of available organs, research has highlighted the importance of identifying and treating psychosocial factors, including substance use, present at the pre-transplant evaluation, due to their association with poor post-transplant outcomes (ie, nonadherence, increased risk for rejection, and graft failure). [2][3][4] Studies have examined risk by organ type, but the existing literature largely focuses on marijuana and alcohol use within predominantly adult transplant populations. 5 Though less data exist on substance use rates in pediatric transplant patients, youth substance use in the general population remains a public health concern. 6 Several large longitudinal studies highlight increases in marijuana use as adolescent age increases,

Headache is a highly prevalent condition and is the leading cause for school absences. Despite the rich literature supporting behavioral treatments for headache, many child psychologists mistakenly perceive that they lack appropriate training to treat children with headache. Likewise, many physicians feel underprepared to refer the child for behavioral treatments. This article serves as a primer, providing tools for the general child psychologist or mental health provider by answering frequently asked questions. First, we provide a concise background on pathophysiology and medical care for headache. We then detail aspects of behavioral interventions for headache, including a case example. We included a limited list of up-to-date references most relevant to the child psychologist who does not treat headache on a regular basis to support further reading. By reviewing this primer, local mental health professionals can provide children with headache access to high-quality, evidence-based clinical care closer to home.