The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is efficient in transporting ingested material to the site of delivery in healthy subjects. A fine balance exists between peristaltic forces, the mixing and delivery of the contents, and sensory signaling. This fine balance is easily disturbed by diseases. It is mandatory to understand the pathophysiology to enhance our understanding of GI disorders. The inaccessibility and complex nervous innervation, geometry and mechanical function of the GI tract make mechanosensory evaluation difficult. Impedance planimetry is a distension technology that assesses luminal geometry, mechanical properties including muscle dynamics, and processing of nociceptive signals from the GI tract. Since standardized models do not exist for GI muscle function in vivo, models, concepts, and terminology must be borrowed from other medical fields such as cardiac mechanophysiology. The review highlights the impedance planimetric technology, muscle dynamics assessment, and 3 applied technologies of impedance planimetry. These technologies are the multimodal probes that assesses sensory function, the functional luminal imaging probe that dynamically measures the geometry of the lumen it distends, and Fecobionics that is a simulated feces providing high-resolution measurements during defecation. The advanced muscle analysis and 3 applied technologies can enhance the quality of future interdisciplinary research for gaining more knowledge about mechanical function, sensory-motor disorders, and symptoms. This is a step in the direction of individualized treatment for GI disorders based on diagnostic subtyping. There seems to be no better alternatives to impedance planimetry, but only the functional luminal imaging probe is currently commercially available. Wider use depends on commercialization of the multimodal probe and Fecobionics.

A mechanical approach is needed for understanding anorectal function and defecation. Fecal continence is achieved by several interacting mechanisms including anatomical factors, anorectal sensation, rectal compliance, stool consistency, anal muscle strength, motility, and psychological factors. The balance is easily disturbed, resulting in symptoms such as fecal incontinence and constipation. Novel technologies have been developed in recent years for studying anorectal function. Especially, the Fecobionics device, a simulated feces, has gained attention recently. This facilitates new analysis of anorectal mechanical function. In this study, a theoretical model is developed to analyze anorectal mechanophysiological data generated by the Fecobionics device. Theoretical approaches can enhance future interdisciplinary research for unraveling defecatory function, sensory-motor disorders, and symptoms. This is a step in the direction of personalized treatment for gastrointestinal disorders based on optimized subtyping of anorectal disorders.

No abstract

This review provides a biomechanical perspective on the pathophysiology and treatment of achalasia. The esophagus is efficient in transporting ingested material to the stomach in healthy subjects. A fine balance exists between the peristaltic forces generated in the esophageal body (which herein is defined as the preload) and the resistance in the outlet, the esophago-gastric junction (which is defined as the afterload). Achalasia is a rare esophageal disease that progressively over many years challenges esophageal efficacy. Clinical features and current literature are interpreted using well-known muscle mechanics models and terms from cardiac mechanophysiology. The preload, afterload, length-tension, and strain softening concepts in particular are useful for understanding the remodeling induced by achalasia. The concepts are also useful in understanding the treatment that aim to reduce the lower esophageal sphincter pressure that does not relax sufficiently in achalasia. These treatments cover endoscopic or laparoscopic myotomy, pneumatic balloon dilation, and Botox injections. In addition to the intended reduction of the afterload for aboral transport of ingested materials, the treatments tend to induce gastroesophageal reflux in some patients because they obliterate an important component in the reflux barrier.

No abstract