In this global study of CAR T-cell therapy, a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel provided durable remission with long-term persistence in pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL, with transient high-grade toxic effects. (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02435849 .).

A single-center trial of CD19 directed, lentiviral transduced chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (CTL019) for relapsed and refractory (r/r) B-ALL pediatric patients showed rates of CR >90% with prolonged CAR T cell persistence/CR without further therapy in the majority of patients infused (Maude NEJM 2014). We report here the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the first multicenter global pivotal registration CAR T cell trial. Features of this trial include: i) the first trial in which industry-manufactured cells were provided to all patients; ii) enrollment across 25 centers in the US, EU, Canada, Australia, and Japan; iii) successful transfer and manufacturing of cells in a global supply chain; and iv) successful implementation of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) management across a global trial. All patients had CD19 positive B-ALL with morphologic marrow tumor involvement at registration (>5% blasts), and were either primary refractory; chemo-refractory after first relapse, relapsed after second line therapy; or ineligible for allogeneic SCT. CTL019 was manufactured from patient PBMC under GMP conditions in the US, at a centralized "sponsor-owned" manufacturing facility, and supplied to all sites. The primary endpoint of overall remission rate (CR+CRi) within 3 months and secondary endpoints (EFS, DOR, OS and safety) were assessed by an independent review committee. Based on preliminary data as of March 2016, 57 patients were enrolled. There were 3 manufacturing failures (5%), 5 patients were not infused due to death or adverse events (9%), and 15 patients were pending infusion at the data cut off. Following fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepleting chemotherapy in the majority of the patients, 34 patients (median age 11 [3-23], 50% with prior HSCT) were infused with a single dose of CTL019 at a median dose of 2.9 x106 transduced CTL019 cells/kg (0.2 to 4). Among 29 patients reaching D28 prior to the data cutoff, 83% (24/29) achieved CR or CRi by local investigator assessment, all of which were MRD-negative. Two early deaths occurred prior to initial disease assessment, one due to disease progression and one due to intracranial hemorrhage. Two patients did not respond. One patient was in CR by BM at D28, but CSF was not assessed, therefore this patient was classified as "incomplete" assessment. Safety was managed by a protocol-specified CRS algorithm with no cases of refractory CRS. Using the Penn CRS grading scale, 82% of patients experienced CRS, with 7 grade 3 (21%) and 8 grade 4 (24%) events. 44% patients with CRS required anti-cytokine therapy; all received tocilizumab with or without other anti-cytokine therapy, with complete resolution of CRS. Besides CRS, the most common grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic AEs were febrile neutropenia (29%), increased bilirubin (21%), increased AST (21%), and hypotension (21%). 21% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neuropsychiatric events including confusion, delirium, encephalopathy, agitation and seizure; no cerebral edema was reported. CTL019 in vivo cellular kinetics by qPCR demonstrated transgene persistence in blood in responding patients at and beyond 6 months. Overall exposure (AUC 0-28d) and maximal expansion (Cmax) of CTL019 DNA measured by qPCR was higher in responding compared with non-responding patients. In summary, this pivotal global study in pediatric and young adult patients with r/r B-ALL receiving CTL019, confirms a high level of efficacy and a similar safety profile to that shown in the prior single center experience. Safety was effectively and reproducibly managed by appropriately trained investigators. The study has completed accrual. At the meeting, updated data from a planned formal interim analysis including safety, efficacy (primary and selected secondary endpoints), cellular kinetics, and impact of anti-cytokine therapy will be presented for more than 50 patients infused at 25 global sites. Disclosures Grupp: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Laetsch:Novartis: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy. Bittencourt:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Educational Grant. Maude:Novartis: Consultancy. Myers:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Rives:Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy. Nemecek:Medac, GmbH: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schlis:Novartis: Honoraria. Martin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: One time discussion panel; Novartis: Other: Support of clinical trials. Bader:Medac: Consultancy, Research Funding; Riemser: Research Funding; Neovii Biotech: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Peters:Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Medac: Consultancy. Biondi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Cellgene: Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baruchel:Servier: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Baxalta: Research Funding. June:University of Pennsylvania: Patents & Royalties; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Celldex: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Honoraria; Immune Design: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Immunology, Research Funding; Tmunity: Equity Ownership, Other: Founder, stockholder . Sen:Novartis: Employment. Zhang:Novartis: Employment. Thudium:Novartis: Employment. Wood:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Other: Stock. Taran:Novartis: Employment. Pulsipher:Chimerix: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Study Steering Committee; Medac: Other: Housing support for conference.

The diversity of patient journeys can raise fundamental questions regarding the evaluation of drug effects in clinical trials to inform clinical practice. When defining the treatment effect of interest in a trial, the researcher needs to account for events occurring after treatment initiation, such as the start of a new therapy, before observing the end point. We review the newly introduced estimand framework to structure discussions on the relationship between patient journeys and the treatment effect of interest in oncology trials. In 2017, the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use released a draft addendum to its E9 guideline. The addendum introduces the concept of an estimand to precisely describe the treatment effect of interest. This estimand framework provides a structured approach to discuss how to account for intercurrent events that occur after random assignment and may affect the assessment or interpretation of the treatment effect. The framework is expected to improve coherence between trial objectives, design, analysis, and interpretation, as illustrated by examples in oncology disease settings. The estimand framework was applied to design a trial for a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. The treatment effect of interest was carefully defined considering the range of patient journeys expected for this particular indication and treatment. The trial design was developed accordingly to assess that treatment effect. All parties involved in the design of clinical trials need to consider possible patient journeys to define appropriate treatment effects and corresponding trial designs and analysis strategies. The estimand framework provides a common language to address the complexity introduced by varied patient journeys.

No abstract