No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Aim To improve hospitals disaster preparedness during floods. Background The Thai flood disaster in 2011 struck several sectors, including hospitals. It is necessary to build a disaster preparedness system that ensures that hospitals have the capacity to respond effectively to any kind of disaster. Methods This qualitative study was conducted using content analysis. Purposive sampling was used to select 15 participants, including doctors, nurses and other staff involved in disaster preparedness, and semi‐structured interviews were conducted with them. The study was reported according to COREQ guidelines. Results Healthcare personnel identified several ways in which flood disaster preparedness of hospitals may be enhanced. Three themes and eight subthemes were identified during the data analysis. The three themes were as follows: 1) ongoing efforts for flood prevention and mitigation at a national level; 2) developing operational guidelines to effectively prevent and resolve flood problems at provincial levels; and 3) increasing the levels of flood readiness at the hospital level. Conclusions The results of this study indicate strategies to help policymakers and health personnel enhance flood disaster preparedness measures at hospitals based on the experiences of hospital personnel involved in one of the worst flood disasters worldwide. Relevance to clinical practice Hospitals alone cannot deal with unpredictable events; they need additional assistance in disaster preparedness. There are three levels at which improving hospital flood disaster preparedness can take place: national, provincial and hospital levels. Nursing professionals participate in hospital disaster preparedness and work with multidisciplinary teams to provide services. Nurses should be prepared for such participation, as their involvement, through tailored services for hospital disaster preparedness, can expand the literature on nursing knowledge to improve clinical outcomes.

Objective: Nurses make up the majority of the workforce in any healthcare system. Physical inactivity due to heavy workloads has been widely reported among nurses. This study aimed to examine whether a self-liberation intervention could help nurses increase their physical activity levels that would result in other health benefits. Methods: A two-armed randomized controlled trial was implemented among 40 nurses (20 per arm). The control arm received information about the benefits of physical activity, but with no intervention. The intervention arm received the same information and were given pedometers for 12 weeks to record their daily steps while also receiving weekly reminders. Measurements were taken for anthropometric data, self-reported physical activity, exercise stage-of-change, exercise self-efficacy, and pedometer steps (intervention arm only). All statistical analyses were two-sided, with p ⩽ 0.05. Results: The respondents’ mean age was 47.9 ± 7.02 years with 90% being female. After the intervention, the intervention arm achieved a higher self-efficacy score (4.60 ± 1.75 to 5.63 ± 2.48) while a decline was observed in the control arm (5.02 ± 2.08 to 4.50 ± 1.90). At baseline, 16.7% ( n = 3) of the control arm and 27.8% ( n = 5) of the intervention arm were classified as moderately physically active (McNemar’s test = 1.20, p = 0.549). After 12 weeks, this proportion increased to 27.7% ( n = 5) in the control arm and 50.0% ( n = 9) in the intervention arm (McNemar’s test = 5.00, p = 0.172). For the intervention arm, mean daily step counts rose from 8889 ± 579.84 at week 1 to 9930 ± 986.52 at week 12 and reached the level of statistical significance ( p < 0.01). Waist circumference of the intervention arm decreased significantly more than that of the control group ( p < 0.01). Conclusion: The self-liberation intervention using a pedometer had positive effects on assisting sedentary nursing staff to progress through the stages of health behavior change and on their exercise self-efficacy, which could further help increase their exercise adherence and overall physical and mental wellbeing.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented challenges to nursing practice globally. However, utilizing digital notebook applications to support nursing student practices may be an effective tool for surgical nursing practicum. Objective: This study aimed to design a blended learning curriculum for surgical nursing practicum, utilizing a digital notebook platform. Methods: This study applied the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model to create a blended learning curriculum for surgical nursing practicum, employing the OneNote application platform. The study included three experts and 90 third-year nursing students who evaluated the model. The study was conducted from July 2021 to March 2022 at the Faculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The experts rated the model highly (Mean = 4.33, SD = 0.57). The satisfaction level of the students with the blended learning curriculum using a digital notebook application was also high (Mean = 4.88, SD = 0.31). Conclusion: The blended learning curriculum using a digital notebook application for surgical nursing practicum was satisfactory for learners. The results from this research can be applied in online learning or incorporated into nursing clinical practicum curricula during and even post-pandemic. The study results may also serve as an example or a piece of basic information to further develop an advanced online platform for teaching learning, either in Thailand or globally.