The triple-branched stent graft technique truly has some advantages in simplifying the procedure and reducing the surgical time. However, this technique has some potential risks such as postoperative stent graft shifting or kinking, which may cause occlusion, aortic disruption and malperfusion syndrome. Long-term follow-up and further multicentre clinical trials are necessary to verify their use in this setting and the design of the grafts and surgical procedure should be further refined to reduce the incidence of stent graft complications.
The aim of the present study was to assess whether procalcitonin (PCT) can be used as a diagnostic marker for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in cardiac surgery patients. Between January 2012 and June 2013, a total of 92 patients were recruited and divided into non-VAP (59 patients) and VAP (33 patients) groups. The preoperative and postoperative characteristics of the patients were recorded. Serum levels of PCT, interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Subsequently, receiver operating characteristic curves of the PCT, IL-6 and CRP levels were constructed. In addition, associations between the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores and the serum levels of PCT, IL-6 and CRP in the VAP patients were analyzed. No statistically significant difference was observed between the non-VAP and VAP patients in the occurrence of postoperative complications. However, the SOFA scores (days 1 and 7), the duration of stay in the intensive care unit and the mechanical ventilation time were all significantly higher in the VAP group when compared with the non-VAP group (P<0.05). The optimum PCT cut-off value for VAP diagnosis on day 1 was 5.0 ng/ml, with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 71%. The serum PCT levels on days 1 and 7 were found to correlate positively with the SOFA scores (r=0.54 and r=0.66 for days 1 and 7, respectively). Therefore, the results suggested that serum PCT may be used as diagnostic marker for VAP in patients following cardiac surgery.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has substantially disrupted many processes of care related to emergency cardiac conditions, while there has been no clinical guidance regarding the management of type A aortic dissection. A retrospective multicenter study involving 52 consecutive patients (mean age 52.3, 28.9% women) with type A aortic dissection during COVID-19 pandemic was conducted at tertiary aortic centers in Michigan, Wuhan and Changsha (China). Twenty-four (46.2%) were considered clinically suspicious for COVID-19 based on radiographic lung lesions (70.8%) followed by dyspnea (25.0%), cough (12.5%) and fever (12.5%). Overall, 47 (90.4%) underwent an operation and 5 (9.6%) managed non-operatively. All suspected patients underwent a reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) at arrival, whereas 82.1% in the non-suspected (p=0.054). Among the 24 patients either non-operatively managed or whose operation was delayed for >24 hours, only one (4.2%) died. A total of 3 (6.4%) operated patients had a positive RT-PCR at various timings, including one non-suspected patient preoperatively and two with very recent COVID-19 infection. The first patient died of respiratory failure despite uneventful surgical repair and maximal medical management. The postoperative course of both patients with recent COVID-19 was characterized by severe coagulopathy requiring massive transfusions and prolonged ICU stay. However, both survived to hospital discharge. In light of the possible dismal outcomes associated with dual diagnoses of type A aortic dissection/COVID-19 and the higher-than-expected number of asymptomatic carriers, all type A dissection patients should be immediately tested for COVID-19. Surgical interventions in patients recovered from recent COVID-19 may be safe.
Objective: To investigate the possible overlooked causes of early postoperative paraplegia, a severe complication of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) after total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk (FET). Methods:We reviewed the clinical data and perioperative aortic computed tomography angiography records of 110 consecutive patients with ATAAD who underwent total arch replacement and FET (12 cm) between December 2014 and September 2017 and investigated the possible risk factors related to early postoperative paraplegia.Results: Paraplegia occurred in 5 (4.5%) patients. No significant differences were found between patients with and without paraplegia in terms of sex, age, medical history, cardiopulmonary bypass time, antegrade cerebral perfusion time, rectal temperature during antegrade cerebral perfusion, postoperative hypotension, maximum first 24-hour vasoactive-inotropic score, upper-lower pressure gradient, or false lumen thrombosis. Postoperative aortic computed tomography angiography showed a ''cutoff'' phenomenon in the lower descending aorta in 4 of the 5 patients. Univariate logistical analysis showed that paraplegia was associated with the ''cutoff'' phenomenon (P <.05). The patients with a distance !30 mm from the distal end of the stent to the first untreated intimal tear had significantly greater rates of the ''cutoff'' phenomenon and paraplegia than those with the distance <30 mm (P <.05).Conclusions: Total arch replacement and FET is safe and feasible for ATAAD involving the descending aorta. Early postoperative paraplegia is associated with the ''cutoff'' phenomenon in the lower descending aorta. The position of the first untreated intimal tear may be related with the occurrence of the ''cutoff'' phenomenon and paraplegia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.