Introduction: Breast cancer is on rise and cervix cancer is on declining mode according to the cancer registry data in India. The major mode of financing treatment is out-of-pocket (OOP) and this can push 25% of the cancer affected households below the poverty line. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study with a household perspective was done in the state of Punjab. By using probability proportional to the size method and systematic random sampling, the sample was drawn from every district of Punjab. A face-to-face semi-structured interview schedule was administered to 221 patients. Results: The direct cost contributed 79% toward the total cost-of-illness. The cost of drugs (36.23%) followed by cost of hospitalization (27.05%) and productivity loss (13.44%) were the main contributors toward the total cost of illness. The contribution of indirect cost is 21 per cent of the total cost. The cost of treatment depends upon type of facility used (more in private as compared to the public), stage of cancer (stage above first stage cost more than the first stage), and age at the time of diagnosis aged above sixty incurred more expenditure as compared to the aged below sixty. The 84% of the households had experienced the catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and 51% of the households had faced distress financing (DF). The main financial coping strategies*(*multiple strategies) used were saving (74%), borrowing at low rate of interest (88%), social nets (55%), and selling financial assets (30%).
Serum albumin levels following SAH can be useful to predict development of NND, while its further weekly decrease correlates independently with unfavourable outcome at 3 months. Albumin assessment being readily available may serve as more than a mere nutritional parameter in SAH.
The comparative studies on grading in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) had several limitations such as the unclear grading of Glasgow Coma Scale 15 with neurological deficits in World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), and the inclusion of systemic disease in Hunt and Hess (H&H) scales. Their differential incremental impacts and optimum cut-off values for unfavourable outcome are unsettled. This is a prospective comparison of prognostic impacts of grading schemes to address these issues. SAH patients were assessed using WFNS, H&H (including systemic disease), modified H&H (sans systemic disease) and followed up with Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at 3 months. Their performance characteristics were analysed as incremental ordinal variables and different grading scale dichotomies using rank-order correlation, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Youden's J and multivariate analyses. A total of 1016 patients were studied. As univariate incremental variable, H&H sans systemic disease had the best negative rank-order correlation coefficient (-0.453) with respect to lower GOS (p < 0.001). As univariate dichotomized category, WFNS grades 3-5 had the best performance index of 0.39 to suggest unfavourable GOS with a specificity of 89% and sensitivity of 51%. In multivariate incremental analysis, H&H sans systemic disease had the greatest adjusted incremental impact of 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.91) against a lower GOS as compared to 0.6 (95% CI 0.45-0.74) and 0.55 (95% CI 0.42-0.68) for H&H and WFNS grades, respectively. In multivariate categorical analysis, H&H grades 4-5 sans systemic disease had the greatest impact on unfavourable GOS with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.06 (95% CI 3.94-9.32). To conclude, H&H grading sans systemic disease had the greatest impact on unfavourable GOS. Though systemic disease is an important prognostic factor, it should be considered distinctly from grading. Appropriate cut-off values suggesting unfavourable outcome for H&H and WFNS were 4-5 and 3-5, respectively, indicating the importance of neurological deficits in addition to level of consciousness.
Medicines constitute a substantial proportion of out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses in Indian households. In order to address this issue, the Government of India launched the Jan Aushadhi (Medicine for the Masses) Scheme (JAS) to provide cheap generic medicines to the patients (). These medicines are provided through the Jan Aushadhi stores established across the country. The objective of this study was to do a quick assessment for policy-makers regarding the objective of the JAS. Implications on cost savings for patients and policy implications of the scheme were analyzed. Secondary data sources were used to obtain prices of medicines under the JAS and prices of branded medicines of the same formulations. A cost analysis design was used. There are substantial differences between the JAS price and the cheapest branded medicine available in the market. However, not all JAS prices are lower than branded medicines. For example, the cheapest branded cefuroxime axetil (500 mg) (antibiotic) in the market is almost three times cheaper than its JAS price. Hence, there are cheaper brands available for some commonly prescribed medicines. From the policy perspective, it raises serious questions regarding the pricing of medicines in the JAS and its overarching goal. Since patients are dependent on physicians for medicine prescriptions and have little knowledge of the price variations among branded and generic medicines, the JAS may not provide the cheapest alternative for the patients. Hence, the government should urgently review the JAS prices to achieve its goal of providing low-cost affordable medicines.
Germinomas are highly immunogenic tumors eliciting a strong peri-tumoral immune response that can spillover into the surrounding healthy tissues. This phenomenon can also occur in intracranial germinomas, manifesting as secondary hypophysitis. Herein, we report a case of 12-year-old-girl presenting with polyuria and polydispsia. She had central diabetes insipidus (CDI) and panhypopituitarism. Imaging revealed a sellar-suprasellar mass with infundibular stalk thickening. Transphenoidal biopsy revealed epithelioid granulomas with immunostaining negative for germinomatous cells. Other causes of hypophysitis were ruled out. Accordingly, she was diagnosed as primary granulomatous hypophysitis and treated with high-dose corticosteroids. Three years later she again presented with headache, vomiting and diminution of vision. Imaging showed a heterogeneous, solid-cystic peripheral rim-enhancing lesion at the same location with involvement of hypothalamus, ependyma and pineal gland. Cerebrospinal fluid beta-human chorionic gonadotropin was markedly elevated, confirming the diagnosis of an intracranial germ cell tumor. She was started on chemotherapy; however, she succumbed to febrile neutropenia. We performed a literature search and found 18 anecdotal cases of secondary hypophysitis associated with intracranial germinomas. There was a slight male preponderance (male:female 5:4). Two-thirds of the cases were below 18 years of age. Polyuria was the most common presenting manifestation (83%). CDI and panhypopituitarism were seen in 89 and 78% cases, respectively. Imaging evidence of pituitary stalk thickening was seen in 12 cases (67%), while pituitary enlargement and/or sellar mass were reported in 11 cases (61%). Pineal involvement was extremely rare, being reported in only 1 case, implying the predilection of suprasellar (rather than pineal) germinomas in causing secondary hypophysitis. Histologically, 82% had lymphocytic hypophysitis, while 18% had granulomatous hypophysitis. Initially, the diagnosis of germinoma was missed in 60% of the cases who were wrongly treated with corticosteroids. To conclude, physicians should make it a dictum that all children and adolescents presenting with CDI and pituitary stalk thickening should be rigorously screened for an underlying intracranial germinoma before labeling them as primary hypophysitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.