The article examines supplementary schooling within ethnic minority communities in Leeds and Oslo. Through an analysis of original research involving visits to a sample of supplementary schools in both cities, interviews with teachers and pupils, and reviews of unpublished documentation, the article seeks to understand the scale of provision, variety of purpose and the nature of pedagogy in these schools. Following a brief account of contextualising literature, the article gives an overview of supplementary schooling in each country, and describes research design and the pro le of the participating schools. The article analyses the case study data under the following themes: group solidarity as the overarching function; community vs. individual interests; and curriculum, pedagogy and links with mainstream schooling. It thus considers the positioning of supplementary schools, both in terms of their purpose and relationship with mainstream provision, and examines the assessments of value made by participants. In conclusion, the article discusses the implications for policy and the role of individuals and communities in negotiating social, cultural and educational frameworks.

IntroductionSocial development is one of the most critical developmental areas for human beings. Deficits in social skills may negatively impact several essential domains including academic achievement, interpersonal relationships, behavior, mental health, and adult life outcome. Individuals with autism present with core deficits in social skills. Without supports and effective interventions to enhance social skills, children with autism often struggle to obtain social competence, and may experience challenges in the school, home, and community settings. With effective interventions, children with autism can learn essential social skills that can help to mitigate deficits and strengthen social competence. After a brief review of various theories of social development, this article seeks to present the constructs of social competence, social skills, and adaptive skills in relatable and clear language for educators. Finally, the article will review several evidence-based interventions designed to enhance social skills.I nterest in the role of social interaction for human development has occupied theoreticians in the last century. John Dewey (1938) considered all learning as an activity that is social in nature. Dewey theorized that effective education is derived from social interaction, cooperation, and collaboration. Dewey, therefore, progressively argued for the creation of educational environments that included developmentally appropriate and engaging social learning experiences for children. Dewey's contemporary social psychologist George Herbert Mead (1934) contended that one cannot learn to be social in a vacuum and that social interaction was a prerequisite for learning. Similarly, Jerome Bruner proposed, "The infant's principal "tool" for achieving his ends is another familiar human being." (Bruner 1983, p. 26). Bruner interpreted social interaction as both selfpropelling and self-rewarding. The Russian educational psychologist Lev S. Vygotsky (1978) distinguished between 'inter-psychological processes' and 'intra-psychological processes.' The former has to do with social interaction, cooperation, and collaboration which takes place between

No abstract

The prevalence of autism/autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been increasing across the world. Previous studies in Norway reported, that the prevalence rate for 0-10-year-old children is 1 in 166, and in the case of 11-year-old children it is 1 in 125. Moreover, another nationwide study discovered that 1 in 192 males and 1 in 695 females between the ages of 1-16 years had autism in Norway in the year 2016. This study is underpinned by the data from the National Patient Registry (NPR) for registered incidences of autism/ASD (ICD-10: F84.0 Childhood autism and F84.5 Asperger syndrome). The results show that the prevalence rates of autism/ASD in the capital city of Oslo increased from 2012 to 2016 and the number of children with autism/ASD doubled during this period. Furthermore, in 2016 the results revealed that that 1 in 349 males and 1 in 1594 females between the ages of 1-5 years old had Autism/ASD. Similarly, among the age group of 6-16 years, 1 among 157 males and 1 among 544 females had autism/ASD in the capital city of Oslo in 2016. These findings suggest a 'school-age-effect' in the increase of prevalence rates among the school-age children compared to the preschool-age children. In the following study, the results are presented and discussed along with some suggestions for the educational and healthcare authorities.This study is the first of its kind and investigates the prevalence of autism/ASD among the preschool-age children (1-5 years old) and school-age children (6-16 years old) along with the gender differences in the prevalence of autism/ASD in the capital city of Oslo, Norway from 2012 to 2016.

In recent years, there has been a considerable rise in prevalence rates for autism/autism spectrum disorders (ASD) around the globe. Understanding the patterns of prevalence is essential for policy development at national and local levels that effectively plans for medical, psychological, behavior analytical, and educational interventions. This study presents new data on the prevalence of ASD among preschool and school-age children (ages 1-16 years) in Norway. Based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) criteria for diagnosis, the rate of ASD increased from 2014 to 2016. The study found a much higher increase in prevalence rate among preschool-age (1-5 years) children than school-age (6-16 years) children over the same 2-year period. At the same time, however, the rate of ASD among school-age children (6-16) compared with that among preschool children (1-5) is higher in 2014 and 2016, indicating a school-age effect. The results also indicate a shifting pattern of gender difference in diagnosed preschool-age children. The male-to-female ratio receiving an ASD diagnosis has increased from 4.46:1 in 2014 to 4.57:1 in 2016, suggesting that the gender gap may be slightly widening for preschool children. For school-age children, the gender gap (male-to-female ratio) is slightly narrowing, moving from 3.53:1 in 2014 to 3.46:1 in 2016. While these changes may not seem significant, the implications of the full findings are discussed.