Emergency surgery for PPU has low morbidity and mortality in our experience. MPI is the only scoring system which predicts all - intra-abdominal collection, leak, reoperation and mortality. All four MRPMs had a similar and fair accuracy to predict mortality, however due to geographic and demographic diversity and inherent weaknesses of exiting MRPMs, quest for development of an ideal model should continue.

IntroductionDiabetes mellitus is a growing public health epidemic in Asia. We examined the impact of type 2 diabetes, glycemic control and microvascular complications on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in a multiethnic population-based cohort of Asians without prior cardiovascular disease.Research design and methodsThis was a prospective population-based cohort study in Singapore comprising participants from the three major Asian ethnic groups: Chinese, Malays and Indians, with baseline examination in 2004–2011. Participants with type 1 diabetes and those with cardiovascular disease at baseline were excluded. Type 2 diabetes, Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and presence of microvascular complications (diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy) were defined at baseline. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and revascularization, collected using a national registry.ResultsA total of 8541 subjects were included, of which 1890 had type 2 diabetes at baseline. Subjects were followed for a median of 6.4 (IQR 4.8–8.8) years. Diabetes was a significant predictor of mortality (adjusted HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.08, p<0.001) and MACE (adjusted HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.93, p<0.001). In those with diabetes, higher HbA1c levels were associated with increased MACE rates (adjusted HR (per 1% increase) 1.18, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.26, p<0.001) but not mortality (p=0.115). Subjects with two microvascular complications had significantly higher mortality and MACE compared with those with only either microvascular complication (adjusted p<0.05) and no microvascular complication (adjusted p<0.05).ConclusionDiabetes is a significant predictor of mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in Asian patients without prior cardiovascular disease. Among patients with type 2 diabetes, poorer glycemic control was associated with increased MACE but not mortality rates. Greater burden of microvascular complications identified a subset of patients with poorer outcomes.

MUP patients do not present with septic shock. Omental patch repair or primary closure is sufficient enough. Revision of Billroth-II-GJ into Roux-en-Y-GJ is not mandatory.

No abstract

Background Survival after heart transplantation (HT) has improved considerably since the first HT was performed in 1967 in Cape Town, South Africa. Understanding immunology behind organ rejection has paved way for advances in the assessment of pre-transplant compatibility, development of newer and more specific immunosuppressive drugs, and management of rejection. Objectives Unlike medical therapy for heart failure, transplant protocols vary considerably between different centers. These variations in protocols generally reflect unique population characteristics and the availability of resources. This review article aims to provide a consolidated update on contemporary cardiac transplant medicine. We also aim to highlight local practice and its difference from our international counterparts. Methods A literature search was performed on Pubmed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify trials and review articles that discussed heart transplant immunology and protocols. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) guidelines were also reviewed. We focused on risk factors, prevention strategies, and treatment of cardiac rejection. Results A total of 48 articles were selected to provide a comprehensive overview of the contemporary practice of cardiac transplant immunosuppressive therapy. Comparisons were made with local data and practice protocols to highlight key differences. Conclusion Heart transplant covers a small subset of cardiac patients and much of the evidence is derived from empirical observations and retrospective analysis. This accounts for the heterogeneity in care and treatment protocols. More studies are needed to select best practices from around the world to further improve outcomes.