Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an indolent B-cell lymphoma arising from marginal zone B-cells present in lymph nodes and extranodal tissues. MZL comprises 5-17% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in adults. The World Health Organization categorizes MZL into three distinct types based on their site of impact: (1) splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL); (2) nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL); (3) extranodal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, which can be subdivided into gastric and nongastric. The subgroups of MZL share some common features but are different in their biology and behavior. Owing to the rarity of MZL there are few randomized trials available comparing various treatment options and therefore treatment is controversial, lacking standard guidelines. Treatment should be patient tailored and can range from a 'watchful waiting' approach for asymptomatic patients without cytopenias to surgery or localized radiation therapy. Rituximab in combination with chemotherapy has resulted in longer failure-free survival than chemotherapy alone in patients with SMZL. Helicobacter pylori positive gastric MALT shows a good response rate to triple antibiotic therapy. Newer therapies such as bendamustine, everolimus, lenalidomide, vorinostat and phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors are in clinical trials for patients with relapsed or refractory MZL and have shown promising results. We are presently conducting clinical trials testing the efficacy of the epigenetic activity of cladribine as a hypomethylating agent in combination with the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) vorinostat and rituximab in patients with MZL. Further studies with the newer agents should be done both in newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MZL to streamline the care and to avoid the use of toxic chemotherapies as initial treatment.

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) is a treatment modality traditionally used in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but little is known regarding the role and effectiveness of RT in the era of novel agents, i.e., immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 449 consecutive MM patients seen at our institute in 2010–2012 to assess indications for RT as well as its effectiveness. Pain response was scored similarly to RTOG 0631 and used the Numerical Rating Pain Scale.Results: Among 442 evaluable patients, 149 (34%) patients and 262 sites received RT. The most common indication for RT was palliation of bone pain (n = 109, 42%), followed by prevention/treatment of pathological fractures (n = 73, 28%), spinal cord compression (n = 26, 10%), and involvement of vital organs/extramedullary disease (n = 25, 10%). Of the 55 patients evaluable for pain relief, complete and partial responses were obtained in 76.4 and 7.2%, respectively. Prior RT did not significantly decrease the median number of peripheral blood stem cells collected for autologous transplant, even when prior RT was given to both the spine and pelvis. Inadequacy of stem cell collection for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was not significantly different and it occurred in 9 and 15% of patients receiving no RT and spine/pelvic RT, respectively. None of the three cases of therapy-induced acute myelogenous leukemia/MDS occurred in the RT group.Conclusion: Despite the introduction of novel effective agents in the treatment of MM, RT remains a major therapeutic component for the management in 34% of patients, and it effectively provides pain relief while not interfering with successful peripheral blood stem cell collection for ASCT.

Therapeutic options for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) whose disease has relapsed after a prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) include an expanding armamentarium of novel agents, often combined with traditional chemotherapy, or a second ASCT, with no clear standard of care. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 75 patients who underwent salvage melphalan-based ASCT for relapsed MM at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1995 and 2012. Conditioning was performed with melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (n = 43), 180 mg/m(2) (n = 1), 140 mg/m(2) (n = 22), and 100 mg/m(2) (n = 9). The median age at second ASCT was 59 years (range, 36 to 75), and 58% (n = 35) were men. Of those with available data, 19% had high-risk cytogenetics (including t (4;14), p53 loss, or del 13q by karyotype) at the time of second ASCT. Median interval between first and salvage ASCT was 37.5 months (range, 6.9 to 111.4). Of 72 assessable patients, 57% had chemotherapy-sensitive disease before to salvage ASCT and 43% were chemoresistant. Four patients died within 100 days of ASCT. Response was assessed at 2 to 3 months post-ASCT, and of 71 assessable patients, 82% achieved at least a partial response, 15% had stable disease, and 3% progressed despite salvage ASCT. After salvage ASCT, 38 patients received maintenance therapy and 14 went on to allogeneic ASCT. The median progression-free survival (PFS) after second autograft was 10.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6 to 13.4) and median overall survival (OS) 22.7 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 41.2). Patients with chemosensitive relapse had a trend toward better PFS (hazard ratio [HR], .60 [95% CI, .36 to 1.02]; P = .058) and significantly longer OS (HR, .49 [95% CI, .27 to .88]; P = .017) than patients with resistant relapse. Those with high-risk cytogenetics at the time of second ASCT had higher risk of death (HR, 2.98 [95% CI, 1.28 to 6.97]; P = .012) compared with patients with standard-risk cytogenetics. Salvage ASCT is an effective strategy for relapsed MM with chemosensitive disease and results in comparable PFS and OS to other salvage strategies.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is incurable with standard chemotherapy. There is no consensus on the best initial therapy, especially for elderly patients, who are not candidates for aggressive treatment approaches. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines include rituximab (R) plus cladribine for the initial treatment of MCL. However, few data are available to substantiate this recommendation. Therefore, to further define the role of R-cladribine for the initial treatment of MCL, we performed a retrospective chart review of 31 patients with MCL (median age, 67) treated with R-cladribine. The majority of responding patients also received R maintenance. The overall response rate was 87%, with 61% of patients achieving a complete remission (CR/CRu). The estimated median follow-up was 32.5 months, median PFS was 37.5 months, and median OS was 85.2 months. One of 19 (5.3%) subjects in CR/CRu relapsed (median follow-up of 23 months). CR/CRu was associated with improved survival (p < 0.0001), while a high mantle cell international prognostic index (MIPI) was associated with worse survival (p = 0.05). There was one toxic death (neutropenic pseudomonal sepsis) related to treatment. R-cladribine is an effective therapy for previously untreated MCL, and these results validate the use of R-cladribine for the initial treatment of MCL.

Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma is a chronic lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by a proliferation of plasma cells, small lymphocytes, plasmacytoid lymphocytes and the production of monoclonal IgM. Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) are rare non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) that can be found in the brain, leptomeninges, eyes or spinal cord, and are mostly intracerebral. PCNSLs constitute 3-4% of primary brain tumors, and in most cases are diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL).(1) Low grade lymphomas as primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma are very rare. We present here a case report of a woman who presented with headache and was found to have primary intracranial lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL).