A metamorphic event in the Vammala Migmatite Belt (VMB) at ~1.92 Ga, revealed by SHRIMP U-Pb analyses of both zircon overgrowths and monazite,is interpreted as post-depositional and is correlated with the development of the early high-grade schistosity.Neither this Early Svecofennian deformation and metamorphism, nor the associated complex folding, is present in the overlying Ta mpere Schist Belt (TSB) sequence, consistent with the VMB being part of a pre-1.91 Ga basement complex. The ~1.92 Ga event provides a maximum deposition age for the TSB,confirming earlier age estimates. Earlier stratigraphic correlations between parts of the VMB and TSB,and associated tectonic interpretations, can no longer be sustained.The crustal thickening seen in the VMB,and previously attributed to arc accretion at ~1.89 Ga, is now attributed to accretion of a large Svionian marginal basin during the 'Early Svecofennian' orogenic phase at ~1.92 Ga.This is of similar age to the deformation and metamorphism associated with collision in the Lapland-Kola Orogen to the north of the Karelian Province. The well-known post-TSB orogenic phase was also identified in the VMB by a monazite age of 1881±6 Ma. A granitoid intrusion gave an emplacement age of 1888±5 Ma, comparable to the age of granitoid clasts in the upper part of the TSB succession.The detrital zircon data are interpreted to suggest that deposition of the precursor VMB sediments probably took place soon after an earlier pre-depositional metamorphism at ~1.98 Ga, which affected igneous source complexes dated at ~1.99 Ga and ~2.01 Ga. Mafic rocks in the southern part of the VMB,and probably also the Haveri basalts, represent a renewed episode of extensional magmatism, which might correlate with the 1.96-1.95 Ga Jormua and Outokumpu ophiolites. A pre-1.96 Ga older stage basin has an expression in Sweden and complexes of similar age occur in the concealed Palaeoproterozoic basement south of the Gulf of Finland. Similar rocks, deformed and metamorphosed before ~1.96 Ga, might be present beneath the Central Finland granitoid complex and the late Svecofennian granite-migmatite zone,and were possibly more local sources for both the younger stage Svionian basin sediments and the post-1.91 Ga Bothnian Basin sediments.The TSB and other post-accretionary volcanic sequences, and the associated plutonism, are interpreted to reflect a ~40 m.y.extensional period, inboard of the contemporaneous active margin, between orogenic phases at ~1.92 Ga and ~1.88 Ga.This interpretation provides a more satisfactory explanation of the major heat input to the crust over a very wide area than does the arc accretion hypothesis.The tectonic evolution of the Svecofennian Province has strong similarities to that of the Palaeozoic Lachlan Fold Belt in eastern Australia.
which is characterized by Kfs-poor leucosomes and borders the former belt in the north. The present paper deals with selected migmatitic rocks from the latter belt. It is aimed to study the temporal and structural relationships of the different leucosome generations, and to establish the pressure-temperature-time paths of this belt.The Tonalite-Trondhjemite Migmatite Belt consists mainly of migmatitic rocks with various types of synorogenic granitoids and minor mafic and ultramafic rocks. The mesosome of the migmatites consist of garnet-sillimanite-biotite-plagioclase-cordierite-quartz assemblages with rare K-feldspar and late andalusite. The oldest leucosomes are dominated by plagioclase and quartz, and the content of K-feldspar increases in later leucosomes. Microtextural analysis in conjunction with THERMOCALC calculations and geothermometry shows that these rocks were metamorphosed at peak conditions of 700-750°C at 4-5 kbar and aH,0 = 0.4-0.7. The formation of cordierite coronas around garnet and the late crystallization of andalusite suggest that the final stage of the P-T history was characterized by decompression and cooling within the andalusite stability field, estimated at 500-650°C and 3-4 kbar.Detailed isotopic dating of mesosome and leucosomes of the migmatites was undertaken by conventional U-Pb analyses on monazite and zircon, Sm-Nd analyses on garnet, and ion probe dating on zircon. The monazites are nearly concordant with an average age of 1878.5±1.5 Ma, and garnet-whole rock analyses show that the concordant leucosomes and the mesosome are coeval within error margins having ages of 1893±40 and 1871114 Ma, respectively. However, garnet in the discordant vein leucosome provides an age of 1843±11 Ma, which is marginally younger than the age of the adjacent mesosome and the concordant leucosome (1877+18 and 1880±23 Ma, respectively) and the age of monazite. Zircons from the studied migmatites display complex zoning structures using SEM-based CL-imaging. Most grains have distinct cores, clearly remnants of original grains. The cores display various types of zoning but oscillatory zon-32 H. Mouri, K. Korsman and H. Huhma ing dominates. The cores are overgrown by one or two thin outer rims that are of two types: i) unzoned outer rim, considered as overgrowth of new zircon during a metamorphic event, and ii) weakly oscillatory zoned rim, considered as typical of magmatic recrystallization. Ion probe dating of cores yielded slightly discordant 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ages of between 2866-2002 Ma, which are interpreted as protolith age. Rims yielded two major age groups: the unzoned rims gave ages of 1872-1886 Ma, whereas the rims with oscillatory zoning yielded ages of 1951-1959 Ma. The youngest age group is consistent with the conventional Sm-Nd dating on garnet and U-Pb dating on monazite and we suggest that the migmatites were metamorphosed at granulite facies conditions at ca. 1880 Ma. The 1951-1959 Ma age group yielded by magmatic zircon rims remains difficult to interpret, but may reflect a magmatic eve...
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.