This study aimed at determining how cytogenetic risk status affects outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after undergoing various types of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Of 7812 patients eligible for analysis, cytogenetic risk was classified as favorable for 1088, intermediate for 5025, and poor for 1699. Overall, multivariate analysis showed significant intergroup differences in terms of relapse and survival, with the difference between poor- and intermediate-risk groups being greater than that between favorable- and intermediate-risk groups. Non-relapse mortality was identical for the three groups. Significant effects of cytogenetic risk status on survival were documented irrespective of donor type (related, unrelated, and umbilical cord blood), disease status at the time of transplantation (first or second complete remission, and more advanced disease status), and conditioning intensity (myeloablative and reduced-intensity). Our findings demonstrate robust and constant effects of cytogenetic risk status on survival after allogeneic HCT for patients with AML.
A high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a newly developed device that enables high-flow oxygen therapy for patients with serious cardiopulmonary problems, but there are few data regarding its use in patients with hematological disease. The efficacy and tolerability of HFNCs for patients who developed ARF during the treatment of various hematological diseases was evaluated. Fifty-six patients underwent HFNC therapy during the last 2 years, and the causes of ARF were mainly pneumonia (n = 37) or acute congestive heart failure (n = 7). Only 11 patients (20 %) showed a good response to HFNC therapy, and remaining 45 patients (80 %) failed to respond to the initial HFNC therapy and, therefore, underwent second-line therapy including endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation (n = 15), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (n = 1), or narcotic palliation alone (n = 29). Thus, HFNC appear not to be a viable treatment option in 4 out of 5 patients in this cohort of patients with hematological disease, but it was well tolerated in most patients (96 %); no major complications except for nasal soreness (n = 2) were observed. Multivariate analysis showed that the cause of ARF (pneumonia, odds ratio 11.2, 95 % CI 1.76–71.5, p = 0.01) was the only risk factor for treatment failure.
Recent studies have shown that acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) exhibits a worse clinical outcome than AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS). However, transplant outcomes of patients with AML-MRC have not been reported compared to patients with AML-NOS. We analyzed transplant outcomes among 147 patients with AML-MRC or AML-NOS who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) in a single institution. There were no significant differences in the 2-year overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) between the two groups (2-year OS: 48% vs. 59%; 2-year CIR: 37% vs. 35%; 2-year NRM: 19% vs. 13%). Subgroup analysis adjusting for age and disease status demonstrated the same results between the two groups. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that AML-MRC was not an independent prognostic factor for poor prognosis in the setting of allo-HSCT (p = 0.7). These results suggest that allo-HSCT may overcome the poor prognosis of AML-MRC.
Although the prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) is worse than that of AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS), transplantation outcomes and prognosticators of AML-MRC patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remain unclear. Transplantation outcomes of AML-MRC (n = 4091) were compared with those of AML-NOS (n = 3964) in patients who underwent allo-SCT between 2003 and 2016 using a nationwide registration database. The 3-year overall survival (OS; 35.5% versus 50.6%) was lower and the relapse (42.3% versus 32.1%) and nonrelapse mortality (26.3% versus 22.0%) rates were higher in the AML-MRC group than in the AML-NOS group. Based on the hierarchical AML-MRC classification, myelodysplasia as the sole criterion was associated with better OS compared with AML-NOS, whereas monosomal or complex karyotype and ¡5/del(5q) were associated with poor OS. A history of myelodysplastic syndrome and ¡7/del(7q) did not affect OS. Accordingly, AML-MRC with complex karyotype or ¡5/del(5q) and that with monosomal karyotype were classified as intermediate and high risks, respectively, whereas the remaining cases were classified as low risk. The 3-year OS rates were 50.7%, 36.9%, and 13.8% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P < .001). Risk classification, older age, and low performance status score were significant risk factors for survival in AML-MRC, independently of the disease status. Grades I to II acute graftversus-host disease significantly reduced the 3-year relapse (24.7% versus 31.6%), leading to better survival (hazard ratio, .64). Our prognostic risk stratification can potentially aid in elucidating the diverse transplantation outcomes in patients with AML-MRC.
Background
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) bacteremia causes significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts. However, incidence and risk factors for mortality in S. maltophilia bacteremia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remain controversial. The primary aim of this study is to clarify factors associated with poor prognosis of allo-HSCT recipients with S. maltophilia bacteremia.MethodsFrom January 2005 to December 2014, patients with hematological diseases and S. maltophilia bacteremia at a single transplantation center in Japan were examined for incidence and 90-day mortality. Prognostic factors associated with 90-day mortality among allo-HSCT recipients were analyzed by log-rank test, and significant variables in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model.ResultsA total of 65 patients, including 47 patients undergoing allo-HSCT, developed S. maltophilia bacteremia. The incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia was significantly higher in allo-HSCT recipients compared to patients not receiving allo-HSCT (6.53 vs. 0.36 per 100 admissions, respectively; p < 0.01). The overall 90-day mortality in allo-HSCT recipients was 43%. Independent risk factors for 90-day mortality were low serum albumin (<3.0 g/dl) (HR = 10.86; 95% CI, 3.27–36.12) and high serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (≥10.0 mg/dl) (HR = 3.28; 95% CI, 1.00–10.72). Among 9 patients with both high CRP and low albumin, 5 had pneumonia at the onset of bacteremia and the remaining 4 patients developed pneumonia in a median of 3 days (range, 1 to 8 days) even under effective treatment. All 9 patients eventually died in a median of 2 days (range, 2 to 32 days). The probabilities of developing pneumonia in patients with or without high CRP and low albumin levels were 100% (9/9) and 10.5% (4/38), respectively (p < 0.01).ConclusionsAllo-HSCT recipients had higher rates of S. maltophilia bacteremia than did patients not receiving allo-HSCT. High serum CRP and low serum albumin at the onset of bacteremia are predictive of disease progression to pneumonia and poor prognosis.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-017-2745-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.