Background: Trauma patients are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism given alterations in the coagulation cascade. Chemoprophylaxis with standard dosing of enoxaparin 30 mg subcutaneously twice daily has evolved to incorporate the use of anti-factor Xa (AFXa) trough level monitoring given concerns for decreased enoxaparin bioavailability in this patient population. Current available evidence suggests low rates of goal AFXa trough level achievement with standard enoxaparin dosing. Our study aims to identify the incidence of critically ill trauma patients that did not achieve goal AFXa trough levels and attempts to identify predictors that may influence the lack of achievement of goal levels. Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort analysis performed at a single academic medical center. Adult patients 18 years or older admitted to the surgical intensive care unit secondary to trauma who were initiated on standard prophylactic enoxaparin and had at least 1 AFXa trough level representative of steady state were included. Patient demographics and clinical data were collected, and descriptive statistics were utilized. All statistical tests were 2-tailed and a P < .05 was considered significant. Variables with a P < .10 on univariable analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: A majority of our patient population did not achieve goal AFXa trough levels while receiving standard doses of prophylactic enoxaparin (82.4% [108/131]). Sub-target AFXa levels were associated with higher creatinine clearance values. Positive predictors of obtaining target AFXa levels included automobile versus pedestrian mechanism of injury and requiring an enoxaparin dose escalation to at least 40 mg twice daily. Conclusions: Our study found low rates of achievement of goal AFXa trough levels in critically ill trauma patients receiving standard prophylactic enoxaparin dosing. Certain variables were identified as negative and positive predictors for achievement of goal AFXa trough levels, although the biologic plausibility of these predictors is questionable and requires further investigation.

Introduction The objective of this project was to assess the percentage of interoperability compliance within our pediatric hematology/oncology patient care areas for intravenous chemotherapy medications before and after the implementation of circle priming. Methods We conducted a retrospective quality improvement project at an inpatient pediatric hematology/oncology floor and outpatient pediatric infusion center before and after implementation of circle priming. Results There was a statistically significant increase in percent interoperability compliance for the inpatient pediatric hematology/oncology floor from 4.1% prior to implementation of circle priming to 35.6% after (odds ratio 13.1 (95% CI, 3.96−43.1), p < 0.001), as well as for the outpatient pediatric infusion center from 18.5% to 47.3%, respectively (odds ratio 3.9 (95% CI, 2.7−5.9), p < 0.001). Conclusion Implementation of circle priming has significantly increased the percentage of interoperability compliance for intravenous chemotherapy medications in our pediatric hematology/oncology patient care areas.

BackgroundWhile current guidelines suggest a total treatment duration of 7 to 14 days for gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSI), there is mounting evidence to suggest that shorter durations may be sufficient. This study compared the treatment outcomes of patients who received short duration therapy (6–10 days) with those who received long durations (11–15 days).MethodsThis was a retrospective study of adult patients who grew an aerobic gram-negative organism from a blood culture while admitted at Strong Memorial Hospital between May 2016 and May 2018. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality and relapsed GN-BSI with the same organism within 90 days of index culture. Secondary outcomes included clinical resolution at end of therapy (EOT), length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rate, Clostridoides difficile infection (CDI), development of recurrent GN-BSI resistant to prior antibiotic therapy, and development of multi-drug-resistant (MDR) GN-BSI within 90 days. Appropriate therapy was defined as an antibiotic with confirmed in vitro susceptibility that was either parenteral or a highly bioavailable oral antibiotic (fluoroquinolones or sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim).ResultsOf 600 patients screened, 116 were included in the long duration group and 34 patients in the short-duration group. The majority of patients had a urinary source of infection (59.3%). The primary composite outcome occurred in 11.8% of the short duration group compared with 10.3% in the long (P > 0.999). There was no difference in clinical resolution at EOT, LOS, or rates of CDI, MDR GN-BSI, recurrent GN-BSI resistant to prior therapy, or 30-day readmission. Patients in the long duration group were discharged with longer appropriate outpatient courses (8 days vs. 0.5 days, P < 0.001), which remained significant when including lower bioavailability agents (e.g., oral β lactams) (8 days vs. 5 days, P < 0.001).ConclusionThere was no difference in clinical outcomes between the long and short duration therapy for treatment of GN-BSI. This study may support shorter treatment durations for uncomplicated GN-BSI, but should be interpreted cautiously given the smaller sample size.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.