The PREDICTS project—Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems (www.predicts.org.uk)—has collated from published studies a large, reasonably representative database of comparable samples of biodiversity from multiple sites that differ in the nature or intensity of human impacts relating to land use. We have used this evidence base to develop global and regional statistical models of how local biodiversity responds to these measures. We describe and make freely available this 2016 release of the database, containing more than 3.2 million records sampled at over 26,000 locations and representing over 47,000 species. We outline how the database can help in answering a range of questions in ecology and conservation biology. To our knowledge, this is the largest and most geographically and taxonomically representative database of spatial comparisons of biodiversity that has been collated to date; it will be useful to researchers and international efforts wishing to model and understand the global status of biodiversity.
Although the Guinea-Congolian rain forest region is an important focal point for conservation in Africa, very little information is available on the effects of forest modification and land use on the region's biodiversity. We studied bird communities and vegetation characteristics in 24 sampling stations distributed over two near-natural forests (near-primary forest, secondary forest), and two land use types (agroforestry, annual cultures) in the lowlands of the Korup region, Cameroon. Repeated sampling was used to establish near-complete inventories of bird assemblages for each site. Despite a 90% average drop in tree basal area from forest to farmland, overall bird species richness did not decrease significantly with increasing habitat modification. However, different groups of birds responded in different ways. Frugivorous and omnivorous bird species richness did not differ between habitats, whereas richness in granivorous, flower-visiting, and nonbreeding species was higher in land use systems compared to forests. In contrast, insectivorous birds, especially terrestrial and large arboreal foliage gleaning insectivores, and ant followers showed a declining species richness from forest to farmland. Also, richness in species of those restricted to the Guinea-Congolian forest biome and of the family Pycnonotidae showed a pronounced decline with increasing habitat modification. Species richness of overall insectivores, terrestrial insectivores, large-and medium-sized arboreal foliage gleaners, ant followers, as well as pycnonotids and biome-restricted species, were strongly or even very strongly positively correlated with overstory tree density and, in most cases, also with basal area. In contrast, tree density and basal area were strongly negatively correlated with species richness of nonbreeding visitors and flower-visiting bird species. Species composition was most distinct between near-primary forest and annual culture sites, and the abundance of 23 out of 165 species was affected by habitat, suggesting considerable partitioning of habitat niches along the habitat gradient. Our results stress the importance of tree cover in tropical land use systems for the maintenance of resident forest bird populations and confirm that natural forest management is more beneficial for global bird conservation compared to other forms of forest exploitation, including agroforestry systems.
Overexploitation is one of the main pressures driving wildlife closer to extinction, yet broad‐scale data to evaluate species’ declines are limited. Using African pangolins (Family: Pholidota) as a case study, we demonstrate that collating local‐scale data can provide crucial information on regional trends in exploitation of threatened species to inform conservation actions and policy. We estimate that 0.4‐2.7 million pangolins are hunted annually in Central African forests. The number of pangolins hunted has increased by ∼150% and the proportion of pangolins of all vertebrates hunted increased from 0.04% to 1.83% over the past four decades. However, there were no trends in pangolins observed at markets, suggesting use of alternative supply chains. The price of giant (Smutsia gigantea) and arboreal (Phataginus sp.) pangolins in urban markets has increased 5.8 and 2.3 times respectively, mirroring trends in Asian pangolins. Efforts and resources are needed to increase law enforcement and population monitoring, and investigate linkages between subsistence hunting and illegal wildlife trade.
Supplementary File S1: Questionnaire sent to individuals and organisations involved with parrot research and conservation soliciting information on conservation status and opinions on threats, and priority actions for research and conservation within their area of expertise. Categories for scope, severity and impact of different threats adapted from the IUCN-CMP Unified Classification of Direct Threats version 3.1 THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF AFRICAN PARROTSThis survey is being conducted as part of an initiative of the Parrot Researchers Group (PRG) / Research Coordination Committee on Parrots (RCCP) of the International Ornithologists' Union (IOU), to review the conservation status of African Parrots and identify conservation and research priorities. Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your contribution will be acknowledged in all reports.
BackgroundCameroon is known as Africa in miniature because of its multitude of ecosystems and associated biodiversity, cultures and traditions. The country also harbors very ancient human populations whose relationship with nature is very intimate and where animals play important roles for their livelihood. Located in the South-west region of Cameroon, the Nkwende Hills Forest Reserve (NHFR) represents an important wildlife conservation site because of its strategic position at the periphery of Korup National Park (KNP). The periphery of NHFR is inhabited by several ethnic groups amongst which are the Obang and Ngunnchang clans who share particular relationships with wildlife. The present paper studies these relationships and contributes to the growing trend of scientific ethnozoological studies across Africa.MethodFrom August to December 2011, a questionnaire survey was addressed to 126 randomly chosen household respondents (HRs) in seven villages at the Northwest periphery of NHFR. In households, preference was given to parents, and to the eldest child in case the parents were absent. Questions related to the uses and local taboos on wildlife species were asked to HRs.ResultsBoth communities have accumulated knowledge on the use of 51 wildlife species of which 50.9% represent mammals, 21.6% birds, 15.7% reptiles, 7.8% fish and 3.9% invertebrates. Four main use categories of wildlife by both communities were identified, namely (1) Food, medicine and sales values (41.2%), (2) Ethnomusical animals and parts used as trophy (29.2%), (3) Decoration and jewelry making values (21.9%) and (4) Magico-religious and multipurpose values (7.8%). Regarding local taboos, species specific taboos (generation totems and acquired totems), habitat taboos (sacred forests), method and segment taboos still persist but are rarely respected among the youth mainly because of the scarcity of wildlife (65.3% of HRs).ConclusionLike other communities living around forest areas, the studied communities use wildlife in their culture and tradition. Wildlife is not only used for consumption, but also for traditional medicines, craft materials and spiritual purposes. But, threats to wildlife and their traditional uses are real and acculturation seems to be the main driver. High priority should be given to the reconciling conservation of species with high values for local communities and human needs.
Despite an increasing amount of data on the effects of tropical land use on continental forest fauna and flora, it is debatable whether the choice of the indicator variables allows for a proper evaluation of the role of modified habitats in mitigating the global biodiversity crisis. While many single-taxon studies have highlighted that species with narrow geographic ranges especially suffer from habitat modification, there is no multi-taxa study available which consistently focuses on geographic range composition of the studied indicator groups. We compiled geographic range data for 180 bird, 119 butterfly, 204 tree and 219 understorey plant species sampled along a gradient of habitat modification ranging from near-primary forest through young secondary forest and agroforestry systems to annual crops in the southwestern lowlands of Cameroon. We found very similar patterns of declining species richness with increasing habitat modification between taxon-specific groups of similar geographic range categories. At the 8 km2 spatial level, estimated richness of endemic species declined in all groups by 21% (birds) to 91% (trees) from forests to annual crops, while estimated richness of widespread species increased by +101% (trees) to +275% (understorey plants), or remained stable (- 2%, butterflies). Even traditional agroforestry systems lost estimated endemic species richness by - 18% (birds) to - 90% (understorey plants). Endemic species richness of one taxon explained between 37% and 57% of others (positive correlations) and taxon-specific richness in widespread species explained up to 76% of variation in richness of endemic species (negative correlations). The key implication of this study is that the range size aspect is fundamental in assessments of conservation value via species inventory data from modified habitats. The study also suggests that even ecologically friendly agricultural matrices may be of much lower value for tropical conservation than indicated by mere biodiversity value.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.