Porous polyurethane foams provide a low-cost method for separating dust into health-related fractions in accordance with recognized sampling conventions. A number of dust sampling instruments that make use of foam selectors have been described in recent literature, but practical experiences of using these instruments in real workplaces have not been widely reported. An IOM inhalable dust sampler incorporating a respirable-fraction selector foam was evaluated in a range of industries, for general occupational dust monitoring. The key issues addressed were those that determine the practicability of the instrument, such as limitations on particulate loading, losses or movements of particles during transportation of samples, and equivalence with conventional respirable dust sampling methods. The new sampler was found to be satisfactory in all these respects. The minor problems experienced have been addressed during the design of the production version of the foam cassette, which is available as an accessory for the existing IOM inhalable dust sampler. The key advantage of the new dust sampler is that it measures both inhalable and respirable dust concentrations in a single sample (hence the name: dual-fraction dust sampler). Therefore, it saves both time and money in industries where both inhalable and respirable dust are routinely monitored.
A study to characterise the quantity, particle size distribution and morphology of dust created during the machining of MDF was carried out. Four different types of MDF boards were included in this study, including a 'zero-formaldehyde' board that contains isocyanate-based resin, rather than urea-formaldehyde resin. In addition, natural softwood (pine) and natural hardwood (oak) were included in the study, for comparison with MDF. The results show that in general, the dust generated by machining MDF is comparable in terms of particle size distribution and morphology with the dust generated by similarly machining hardwood or softwood. The quantity of dust generated during sanding is higher for sanding MDF compared with sanding either hardwood or softwood. However, for sawing there is no significant difference between MDF and natural woods, in terms of the quantity of dust generated. Free formaldehyde in the air was less than 0.17mg m(-3) during machining of the Class B (higher formaldehyde potential) MDF board. There was no measurable isocyanate in the dust generated from the boards.
A new European/International Standard (ISOprEN 10882-1) on the sampling of airborne particulates generated during welding and allied processes has been proposed. The use of a number of samplers and sampling procedures is allowable within the defined protocol. The influence of these variables on welding fume exposures measured during welding and grinding of stainless and mild steel using the gas metal arc (GMA) and flux-cored arc (FCA) and GMA welding of aluminium has been examined. Results show that use of any of the samplers will not give significantly different measured exposures. The effect on exposure measurement of placing the samplers on either side of the head was variable; consequently, sampling position cannot be meaningfully defined. All samplers collected significant amounts of grinding dust. Therefore, gravimetric determination of welding fume exposure in atmospheres containing grinding dust will be inaccurate. The use of a new size selective sampler can, to some extent, be used to give a more accurate estimate of exposure. The reliability of fume analysis data of welding consumables has caused concern; and the reason for differences that existed between the material safety data sheet and the analysis of fume samples collected requires further investigation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.