Access of recombinant proteins to the retina following intravitreal administration is poorly understood. A study was conducted in male Rhesus monkeys (15 to 28 mo of age; 2.8-3.3 kg) in order to compare the intraocular tissue distribution, pharmacokinetics, and safety of 125 Iodine (I)-labeled full-length humanized rhuMAb HER2 antibody (148 kD) and of 125 I-labeled humanized rhuMAb vascular endothelial growth factor Fab antibody (48.3 kD) following bilateral bolus intravitreal injection on day 0 (5 animals/group). The dose administered to each eye was 25 μg (9-10 μCi) in 50 μl. Animals were euthanatized on day 0 (1 hr postdose) and on days 1, 4, 7, and 14. Safety assessment included direct ophthalmoscopy, intraocular pressure measurements, clinical observations, body weight, and hematology and clinical chemistry panels. Blood and vitreous samples were collected daily (blood only) and at necropsy for pharmacokinetics and analysis for antibodies to the test materials; the ocular tissue distribution of the test material was evaluated by microautoradiography. All animals completed the study. Microautoradiography demonstrated that the full-length antibody did not penetrate the inner limiting membrane of the retina at any of the time points examined. In contrast, the Fab antibody fragment diffused through the neural retina to the retinal pigment epithelial layer at the 1-hr time point and persisted in this location for up to 7 days. Systemic exposure to test material was low but variable: the highest plasma concentration of the full-length antibody was 20.3 ng/ml, whereas plasma concentrations for the Fab antibody remained below the limit of quantitation (i.e., <7.8 ng/ml). An immune response to the test material was not evident in either treatment group. The half-life in vitreous was 5.6 days for the full-length antibody and 3.2 days for the Fab antibody. The shorter intravitreal half-life of the Fab antibody is related to its smaller size and its significant diffusion through the retinal layers. The differences in pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution that are noted between the full-length and Fab antibodies in this study identify potential therapeutic approaches that may be exploited in specific disease conditions.

Aims To investigate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of fast‐acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) versus insulin aspart (IAsp) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and methods In a randomized, double‐blind, crossover design, 61 people with T2D usually treated with insulin ± oral antidiabetic drug(s) received single‐dose faster aspart and IAsp (0.3 U/kg) on separate visits. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were collected frequently until 12 hours post‐dose. Glucose‐lowering effect was determined in a euglycaemic clamp lasting up to 12 hours post‐dose (target 5.0 mmol/L). Results The serum IAsp pharmacokinetic profile and glucose‐lowering effect profile were shifted to the left for faster aspart versus IAsp. Least squares mean (± SE) onset of appearance was 3.3 ± 0.3 minutes for faster aspart, which was 1.2 minutes earlier than for IAsp (95% confidence interval [CI] −1.8;−0.5; P = .001). Onset of action for faster aspart was 8.9 minutes earlier (95% CI −12.1;−5.7; P < .001) than for IAsp. During the first 30 minutes after dosing, 89% larger IAsp exposure (ratio faster aspart/IAsp 1.89 [95% CI 1.56;2.28]; P < .001) and 147% greater glucose‐lowering effect (2.47 [95% CI 1.58;6.22]; P < .001) were observed for faster aspart compared with IAsp. Offset of exposure (time to 50% of maximum IAsp concentration in the late part of the pharmacokinetic profile) occurred earlier for faster aspart (difference faster aspart – IAsp −36.4 minutes [95% CI −55.3;−17.6]; P < .001). The treatment difference of faster aspart – IAsp in offset of glucose‐lowering effect (time to 50% of maximum glucose infusion rate in the late part of the glucose infusion rate profile) was −14.4 minutes (95% CI −34.4;5.5; P = .152). Conclusions In people with T2D, faster aspart was associated with earlier onset and greater initial exposure and glucose‐lowering effect compared with IAsp, as previously shown in people with type 1 diabetes.

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) bioresorbable microspheres are used for controlled-release drug delivery and are particularly promising for ocular indications. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of a recombinant human monoclonal antibody (rhuMAb HER2) in rabbits after bolus intravitreal administration of a solution or a PLGA-microsphere formulation. On Day 0, forty-eight male New Zealand white rabbits (2.3-2.6 kg) were immobilized with intramuscular ketamine/xylazine, and the test materials were injected directly into the vitreous compartment. Group 1 animals received rhuMAb HER2 in 50:50 lactide: glycolide PLGA microspheres; Group 2 animals received rhuMAb HER2 in solution (n = 24/group). The dose for each eye was 25 microg (50 microl). After dosing, animals were sacrificed at 2 min, and on 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 23, 29, 37, 44, 50, and 56 days (n = 2/timepoint/group). Safety assessment included direct ophthalmoscopy, clinical observations, body weight, and hematology and clinical chemistry panels. At necropsy, vitreous and plasma were collected for pharmacokinetics and analysis for antibodies to rhuMAb HER2, and the vitreal pellet (Group 1) was prepared for histologic evaluation. All animals completed the study per protocol-both treatments were well tolerated, and no suppurative or mixed inflammatory cell reaction was observed in the vitreal samples (Group 1) at any of the time points examined. Antibodies to rhuMAb HER2 were detected in plasma samples by Day 7 in both treatment groups, but infrequently in vitreous samples. There were no safety implications associated with this immune response. The in vitro characterization of the PLGA microspheres provided reasonable projections of the in vivo rhuMAb HER2 release kinetics (Group 1). The total amount of antibody that was released was similar in vitro (25.9%) and in vivo (32.4%). RhuMAb HER2 (Group 2) was cleared slowly from the vitreous compartment, with initial and terminal half-lives of 0.9 and 5.6 days, respectively. The volume of distribution approximated the vitreous volume in a rabbit eye.

The development of a neovascular supply (angiogenesis) is a major aspect of tumorigenesis. Recent work has indicated that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a major regulator of angiogenesis. In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that an anti-VEGF antibody is capable of suppressing the growth of human tumor cell lines. The following study was conducted in tumor-bearing nude mice to evaluate the concentration-response relationship of murine anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (muMAb VEGF) so that an efficacious plasma concentration of the recombinant humanized form (rhuMAb VEGF) in cancer patients could be estimated. (This study was included in our Investigational New Drug application to support the clinical dosing regimen and projected human safety factors for the toxicology program.) Additionally, the growth dynamics of the tumors were evaluated as a function of dose to explore whether a mechanismic interpretation of tumor growth inhibition by muMAb VEGF is possible. On day 1, A673 human rhabdomyosarcoma cells (2 x 10(6) cells/mouse) were injected subcutaneously in 188 beige nude mice (16-24 g). Treatment with muMAb VEGF (0.05-5.0 mg/kg; n = 24/group), phosphate-buffered saline (n = 10), or anti-gp120 isotype-matched control antibody (5.0 mg/kg; n = 10) began 24 hr later. Each animal received intraperitoneal injections of test material twice weekly for 4 wk. Immediately prior to each dose, 2 mice from each muMAb VEGF group were selected randomly, and plasma was collected for pharmacokinetic evaluation; at the end of the study, samples were collected from all animals for pharmacokinetic evaluation. Tumor dimensions were recorded weekly, and at the end of the study, tumor weight and dimensions were recorded. Satisfactory tumor suppression in nude mice was achieved at muMAb VEGF doses of > or =2.5 mg/kg, where the average trough muMAb VEGF plasma concentration was 30 microg/ml (concentrations in individual animals >10 microg/ml). Assuming the pharmacokinetics of rhuMAb VEGF in patients will resemble the pharmacokinetics of a similar humanized anticancer monoclonal antibodies, a clinical dosing regimen was designed to maintain the rhuMAb VEGF plasma concentration in this efficacious range. This study shows an approach that can be used to estimate a human dosing regimen from preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data. Because we have just initiated clinical trials with rhuMAb VEGF we cannot judge clinical outcome in relation to these preclinical predictions; nonetheless, it is hoped that by sharing our approach and thought processes with other investigators we can assist the discovery and development of anticancer therapeutics.

BackgroundFast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart set in a new formulation with faster initial absorption after subcutaneous administration. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic properties, including the absolute bioavailability, of faster aspart when administered subcutaneously in the abdomen, upper arm or thigh.MethodsIn a randomised, open-label, crossover trial, 21 healthy male subjects received a single injection of faster aspart at five dosing visits: 0.2 U/kg subcutaneously in the abdomen, upper arm and thigh, intramuscularly in the thigh and 0.02 U/kg intravenously. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetics was performed pre-dose and frequently thereafter until 12 h post-dose (8 h after intravenous administration).ResultsOnset of appearance (~3 min), time to 50% of maximum concentration (t Early 50% Cmax; ~20 min) and time to maximum concentration (t max; ~55 min) were all similar between injection regions. Early exposure within the first 2 h after injection (AUCIAsp,0–1h and AUCIAsp,0–2h) as well as maximum concentration (C max) were comparable for the abdomen and upper arm, but were ~25% lower for the thigh as seen previously for other mealtime insulin products. Total exposure (AUCIAsp,0–t) was similar for the abdomen, upper arm and thigh, and absolute bioavailability was ~80% after subcutaneous administration of faster aspart in all three injection regions.ConclusionThe current study supports the ultra-fast pharmacokinetic characteristics of faster aspart across different injection regions, with administration in the abdomen and upper arm resulting in greater early exposure than in the thigh.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02089451.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract