Introduction As an increasing number of specialties have begun to adopt robotic surgery (RS), its prevalence within the NHS is continually rising. This study aims to establish stakeholders’ opinions on the opportunities and challenges of the widespread adoption of RS. Method Participants were recruited through social media platforms such as LinkedIn or via university affiliations and current RS research. Semi-structured interviews of eight surgeons and five company representatives were conducted online. Transcripts were analysed to formulate themes surrounding the opportunities and challenges of RS. Results This study identified six common themes amongst shareholders: Perspective, Ethics, Impact of Robotics, Training, Adoption and Finances. The success rates and quality of results offered by RS make it a recognised future surgical staple amongst interviewees. However, the technology remains a contentious subject amongst surgeons, with many doubting whether the benefits outweigh the costs associated with implementation. Such reservations are further exacerbated by the absence of a formal training pathway. National guidelines are necessary to embed RS within the NHS infrastructure, allowing greater standardisation for patients and surgeons. The importance of patient education to address misconceptions was emphasised. Despite current high costs, robotic technology is forecasted to become cheaper with greater use and increased market competition. Interviewees stressed that responsibility for errors lies with the surgeon, but with the manufacturer for instrument malfunctions. Conclusions This study highlights stakeholders’ views on the opportunities and challenges of RS. The identified themes should form the basis of the proposed recommendations to facilitate a more widespread adoption of RS.
Aim While surgeons and robotic companies are key stakeholders involved in the adoption of Robotic Surgery (RS), the public's role is often overlooked. However, given that patients hold ultimate power over their healthcare decisions, public acceptance of RS is crucial. This study aims to identify public understanding, opinions and misconceptions on RS and present solutions to facilitate its wider integration. Method An online questionnaire distributed via social media platforms between February and May 2021 identified the views of UK adults on RS. The data was evaluated using thematic analysis, descriptive statistics, and statistical analysis. Statistical differences in age, gender, education level, and presence in the medical field were also sought. Results 263 responses were obtained, with 216 (82.1%) analysed. Demographic differences provided significantly different results. Participants were relatively uninformed about RS, with a median knowledge score of 4.00(2.00–6.00) on a 10-point likert scale. Fears surrounding increased risk, reduced precision and technological failure were identified, alongside misconceptions on what RS entails, including it being autonomous. However, providing factual information in the survey about RS statistically increased participant comfort (p=<0.0001). Most (61.8%) participants believed robot manufacturers were responsible for malfunctions, but doctors were held accountable more by older, less educated, and non-medical participants. Conclusions This study highlights the role of negative and inaccurate public perceptions surrounding RS in impeding its widespread adoption. Greater emphasis must be placed on patient education in RS to mitigate misconceptions and ensure greater diffusion of its benefits
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.