Sialolithiasis is one of the most common and extensively obstructive disorders of the major salivary glands. Here, we report 3 cases of sialolithiasis in the submandibular salivary gland showing symptomatic similarities to other dental and non-dental disorders of the maxillofacial area. How the various clinical features of this condition and findings on 3D-CT may lead to a misdiagnosis are also discussed. In the first case, that of a 45-year-old woman, a final diagnosis of a non-radiopaque submandibular sialolith allowed the initially indicated surgical extraction of a malerupted and semi-impacted right mandibular 3rd molar to be abandoned. In the second case, that of a 57-year-old woman, radiographic findings had previously led to a diagnosis of ameloblastoma, which had masked the presence of sialolithiasis for at least 9 years, despite the radiopacity of the sialolith. Meanwhile, exacerbation of sialolithiasis was mistaken for lymphadenitis. In the third case, that of a 40-year-old woman, sialolithiasis was diagnosed in a timely manner, despite the fact that the dentists' attention had initially been focused on odontopathological symptoms. One feature of the present report is the concurrence of dental and non-dental pathologies affecting the same sextant as the sialolithiasis. Despite recent advances in imaging technology and diagnostics, cases of sialolithiasis being misdiagnosed continue to occur in clinical practice.
Since oral cavity, head and neck are relatively well-visualized anatomical sites, the dentists have multifold possibilities for the evaluation of the oral mucosa, face skin, lips, and neck lymph nodes during their routine work. Dentists are the specialists who are able to detect malignant tumors and refer patients to the oncologists. The aim of the article is to compare the clinical recommendations of the Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine and the recommendation made by the American Dental Association (ADA) in their updated clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation of potentially malignant disorders in the oral cavity. Basic principles of the oncological alertness in dentistry, and the route organization of clinical patient. The usage of the classification of precancerous diseases, proposed by Ye.V. Borovskyi, M.F. Danilevskyi, A.L. Mashquillain (1991) is the first step of the oncological alertness in dentistry. The role of dentist is adjuvant and helps to identify a suspicious oral lesion. A pattern of action in such situations is referring patients directly to an oncologist, who will conduct a biopsy, histological examination and treat the cancer. Consequently, the attention of Ukrainian dentists is focused on precancerous lesions, but less attention is paid actually to the cancer. Responsibility for dispanserisation (clinical follow up) is carried mainly by dentists-surgeons without participation of orthopedists, pediatric dentists, and orthodontists. Those involve whole series of redirections of the patient among dentists themselves, before referring to the really necessary specialist, and it represents a negative item in the organization. In contrast to the algorithm provided by the Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine, doing an immediate biopsy in patients with a suspicious oral lesion – or referring a patient to a specialist who can do that – remains the only most important recommendation made by the American Dental Association (ADA) in their updated clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation of potentially malignant disorders in the oral cavity. Epidemiological data in Ukraine, unlike the USA, is not enough to understand the real situation and to plan the measures of oncological alertness. Risk factors for malignant lesions in the oral cavity. The role of HPV-related cancer of the oral cavity is underestimated in Ukraine. “Over the past 20 years HPV infection has surpassed tobacco and alcohol as a major risk factor [for head and neck cancer],” the ADA authors note, and they estimate that HPV infection causes approximately 75% of all OPSCCs identified today. Adjunctive test for precancerous and cancerous cases in the oral cavity (include autofluorescence, tissue reflectance, vital staining, and salivary adjuncts) is recognized by the Ukrainian and American experts, as “adjuncts”, none of which was felt to be accurate enough to identify target lesions in the primary care setting. These methods do not exceed the accuracy of the histological examination. Conclusions. Regardless the geography, dentists have a good opportunity to assess patients for oral cancer caused by traditional head and neck risk factors. Dentists of Ukraine have a good opportunity at the primary care setting to get reports about head and neck cancer prevention, and to inform their patients. The clinical route of a patient with suspected oral lesions is flexible and is connected with appropriate consulting centers, which facilitates the activity of a dentist, but creates additional redirections instead of referring to the specialist immediately. Ukrainian dentists should take signs of HPV-related cancer – cancer that occur at the back of the throat, at the base of the tongue, and on the tonsils – are difficult if not impossible to visualize. So dentists must be trained not only to look inside the mouth but also to assess patients for tonsillar asymmetry.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.