ObjectivesFaced with a costly and demanding learning curve of surgical skills acquisition, the growing necessity for improved surgical curricula has now become irrefutable. We took this opportunity to formulate a teaching framework with the capacity to provide holistic surgical education at the undergraduate level.SettingData collection was conducted in all the relevant healthcare centres the participants worked in. Where this was not possible, interviews were held in quiet public places.ParticipantsWe performed an in-depth retrospective evaluation of a proposed curriculum, through semi-structured interviews with 10 participants. A targeted sampling technique was employed in order to identify senior academics with specialist knowledge in surgical education. Recruitment was ceased on reaching data saturation after which thematic data analysis was performed using NVivo 11.ResultsThematic analysis yielded a total of 4 main themes and 29 daughter nodes. Majority of study participants agreed that the current landscape of basic surgical education is deficient at multiple levels. While simulation cannot replace surgical skills acquisition taking place in operating rooms, it can be catalytic in the transition of students to postgraduate training. Our study concluded that a standardised format of surgical teaching is essential, and that the Integrated Generation 4 (IG4) framework provides an excellent starting point.ConclusionsThrough expert opinion, IG4 has been validated for its capacity to effectively accommodate learning in a safer and more efficacious environment. Moreover, we support that through dissemination of IG4, we can instil a sense of motivation to students as well as develop robust data sets, which will be amenable to data analysis through the application of more sophisticated methodologies.
AimsSub-optimal nutrition among children remains a problem across South Asia (SA). Appropriate complementary feeding practices (CFP) can greatly reduce this risk. We aimed to undertake a systematic review of studies assessing CFP in SA children aged 0– 2 years in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan.MethodsSearches undertaken between January 1990 to June 2016; MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, Web of Science, OVID Maternity and Infant Care, BanglaJOL, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, POPLINE and WHO Global Health Library. Eligibility criteria: primary research on CFP in SA children aged 0–2 years and/or their families. Search terms were: ‘children’, ‘feeding’ and ‘Asians’ with their derivatives. Two researchers undertook study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal (EPPI-Centre Weight of Evidence).ResultsFrom 45,712 studies identified, 126 descriptive studies (105 cross-sectional, 11 cohort, 8 qualitative, 1 case-control and 1 mixed studies) were included. 73 from India, 17 Pakistan and 36 Bangladesh. Despite each adopting WHO Infant and Young Children Feeding (IYCF) Guidelines, CFP were sub-optimal in all three countries.In Pakistan, of 15 studies reporting CFP timings, 8 recorded timely initiation (between 6–9 months). Of those reporting dietary diversity, 3 of 9 studies met minimum dietary diversity requirements across 4 of 7 WHO IYCF food groups. 2 of 3 studies observed minimum meal frequency in over 50% of participants.In India 35 of 59 studies reported timely initiation of CFP. 7 of 9 studies noted minimum dietary diversity achieved between 10%–23% of the study population. 5 of 15 studies noted minimum meal frequency achieved between 25%–96% of the study population.In Bangladesh, in 13 of 36 studies timely initiation of CFP ranged from 42%–64%. 3 of 17 studies noted minimum dietary diversity achieved between 19.8%–57.7% of the study population. 1 of 7 studies noted minimum meal frequency achieved between 33%–81% of the study population.Influencing factors included poor education about CFP, cultural beliefs and socioeconomic variables.ConclusionThis is the first SR to evaluate CFP in infants in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. There is a great need for revision of nationwide child health programmes and campaigns to change health and nutrition behaviour.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.