Magnetic helicity is a conserved quantity of ideal magneto-hydrodynamics characterized by an inverse turbulent cascade. Accordingly, it is often invoked as one of the basic physical quantities driving the generation and structuring of magnetic fields in a variety of astrophysical and laboratory plasmas. We provide here the first systematic comparison of six existing methods for the estimation of the helicity of magnetic fields known in a finite volume. All such methods are reviewed, benchmarked, and compared with each other, and specifically tested for accuracy and sensitivity to errors. To that purpose, we consider four groups of numerical tests, ranging from solutions of the three-dimensional, force-free equilibrium, to magneto-hydrodynamical numerical simulations. Almost all methods are found to produce the same value of magnetic helicity within few percent in all tests. In the more solar-relevant and realistic of the tests employed here, the simulation of an eruptive flux rope, the spread in the computed values obtained by all but one method is only 3 %, indicating the reliability and mutual consistency of such methods in appropriate parameter ranges. However, methods show differences in the sensitivity to numerical resolution and to errors in the solenoidal property of the input fields. In addition to finite volume methods, we also briefly discuss a method that estimates helicity from the field lines' twist, and one that exploits the field's value at one boundary and a coronal minimal connectivity instead of a pre-defined three-dimensional magnetic-field solution.

Relative magnetic helicity is a gauge invariant quantity suitable for the study of the magnetic helicity content of heliospheric plasmas. Relative magnetic helicity can be decomposed uniquely into two gauge invariant quantities, the magnetic helicity of the non-potential component of the field, and a complementary volume-threading helicity. Recent analysis of numerical experiments simulating the generation of solar eruptions have shown that the ratio of the non-potential helicity to the total relative helicity is a clear marker of the eruptivity of the magnetic system, and that the high value of that quantity could be a sufficient condition for the onset of the instability generating the eruptions. The present study introduces the first analytical examination of the time variations of these non-potential and volume-threading helicities. The validity of the analytical formulas derived are confirmed with analysis of three-dimensional (3D) magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulations of solar coronal dynamics. Both the analytical investigation, and the numerical application show that, unlike magnetic helicity, the non-potential and the volumethreading helicities are not conserved quantities, even in the ideal MHD regime. A term corresponding to the transformation between the non-potential and volume-threading helicities frequently dominates their dynamics. This finding has an important consequence for their estimation in the solar corona: unlike with relative helicity, their volume coronal evolution cannot be ascertained by the flux of these quantities through the volume's boundaries. Only techniques extrapolating the 3D coronal field will enable both the proper study of the non-potential and volume-threading helicities, and the observational analysis of helicitybased solar-eruptivity proxies.