Introduction Optimizing hemophilia care remains challenging in developing countries. Burden-of-disease studies are important to develop strategies for improving hemophilia care. Aim The HAEMOcare study evaluated the factors contributing to hemophilia-related orthopedic disease burden in developing countries. Methods HAEMOcare was a noninterventional, cross-sectional, epidemiological study conducted in Algeria, India, Morocco, Oman, and South Africa. Male patients with severe hemophilia (N = 282) aged ≥6 years, without or with inhibitors, being treated on-demand for bleeding were included. Hemophilia-related orthopedic clinical and functional status was assessed using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), radiological status with the Pettersson Score, and quality of life with the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L). Direct and indirect economic costs of hemophilia care were also calculated. Results Patients (mean [standard deviation, SD] age: 20.8 [10.6] years) experienced a mean annualized bleeding rate of 25.8. Overall mean (SD) HJHS and Pettersson score were 17.9 (12.8) and 15.0 (13.5), respectively; scores were similar between patients without or with inhibitors (p = 0.21 and 0.76, respectively). Approximately 70% of adults reported problems relating to pain/discomfort and mobility parameters in the EQ-5D-3L. Mean distance to a hemophilia treatment center (HTC) was 79.4 km. As expected, total costs of hemophilia were statistically significantly higher in patients with inhibitors versus without inhibitors (p = 0.002). Conclusion Inadequate access to HTCs and expert care, along with high bleeding rates, led to equivalent hemophilia-related orthopedic morbidity between hemophilia patients without and with inhibitors. HAEMOcare documented the economic and disease burdens associated with suboptimal hemophilia care in developing countries.
Background: In 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (GICC). The goal is to achieve a global survival rate of at least 60% for all children with cancer by 2030. Morocco was designated as a pilot country for this initiative. Procedure: This retrospective study included a cohort of children aged 0-15 years, with one of the six indexed cancers (acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL], Burkitt lymphoma [BL], Hodgkin lymphoma, retinoblastoma [RB], Wilms tumor or nephroblastoma, low-grade glioma), diagnosed between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 at the six Moroccan Pediatric Hematology and Oncology units. Patients were followedup until August 31, 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, the log-rank test for comparing survival curves, and the Cox model for identifying prognostic factors.
Background In low‐ and middle‐income countries, therapeutic options for advanced, refractory, or relapsing malignancies are limited due to local constraints such as cost of drugs, distance from oncology centers, and lack of availability of new anticancer drugs. Metronomics, which combines metronomic chemotherapy (MC) and drug repositioning, allows for the provision of new therapeutic options for patients in this setting. Aim of the study To evaluate the activity and toxicity of a metronomic regimen in Moroccan pediatric patients with refractory or relapsing malignancies. Patients and methods From July 2014 to January 2018, patients with refractory/relapsing solid tumors treated in five pediatric oncology centers were consecutively enrolled. The metronomic regimen consisted of 28‐day cycles with daily oral administration of cyclophosphamide (30 mg/m2) from days 1 to 21, together with oral etoposide (25 mg/m2) from days 1 to 21 followed by break of one week and daily valproic acid (20 mg/kg) from days 1 to 28. Results Ninety‐eight children (median age, 8 years) were included. Underlying malignancies were neuroblastoma (24 patients), Ewing sarcoma (18), osteosarcoma (14), rhabdomyosarcoma (14), and miscellaneous tumors (28). A total of 557 cycles were given (median: 6; range, 1‐18 cycles). One‐year progression‐free survival of our patients was 19%, and one‐year overall survival was 22%. Complete response was obtained in three cases (3%), partial response in 11 cases (11%), and tumor stabilization for more than six months in 28 cases (28%). Conclusion This three‐drug metronomic combination was well tolerated and associated with tumor response and disease stabilization in 42 patients even for a long period.
AIM: The aim of the study was to improve the quality of pain management in Moroccan pediatric oncology units, the Moroccan Society of Paediatric Haematology/Oncology initiated a national quality improvement project in 2014 with the support of the Lalla Salma Foundation for Prevention and Treatment of Cancer. METHODS: To assess the current situation of pain management in Moroccan pediatric oncology patients, two cross-sectional surveys were conducted, involving patient/parental proxies and health-care providers’. RESULTS: The first survey concerned 108 care providers from five institutions. The second survey covered 155 children with cancer from the five Moroccan pediatric oncology units. Among them, 145 reported suffering from pain, which patients/families attributed to the underlying cancer (n = 85), to procedures and treatment (n = 46), or to both the cancer and procedures/treatment (n = 19). Procedural pain was mainly related to lumbar puncture and bone marrow aspirate. The majority of patients/parents reported that pain negatively impacted their emotional, physical, and social functioning. The majority of parents requested further information and communication about pain management. CONCLUSION: Both health-care providers and families of children with cancer in Morocco report need for pain management improvement, including in institutional and educational practices. This current baseline data have informed the development of our ongoing project including continuing education, training, and practice policies development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.