SummaryTwenty-eight patients with syringomyelia were treated by syringostomy, suboccipital craniotomy, CSF shunt, or a combination of these. In the first months and years after surgery 10 patients were improved. The late results, with the average observation time of 4 years, were less favourable: 4 patients improved, 12 were unchanged, 7 were worse and 5 were dead.
An analysis is given of a series of 25 patients suffering from lumboischialgic pain of different causes, which have been treated by discolysis. Literature reports are taken into consideration. As a result of analysis, the following statements seem justified: In no kind of lumbar disc prolapse are the results of discolysis superior to those of modern operative treatment. Discolysis results are indisputably worse in cases with the usual operative indication, which consists of neurological deficit and large disc prolapse. Favourable results by discolysis can be obtained in cases with disc protrusion or small prolapse, but these cases can mostly be cured also by consequent conservative treatment. Contraindications are marked neurological deficit, demonstration of a large disc prolapse by contrast methods, Verbiest's stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal, low back pain and ischialgia without possible proof of a disc protrusion, cases with low back pain as the main or only feature, spondylolisthesis. Disc prolapse recurrences after discolysis often occur about one month afterwards. Structural instability at this stage is likely. Therefore, as with postoperative treatment, it is advisable to avoid major physical stress for the first weeks after discolysis. Major complications after discolysis are possible, and have occurred. Because discolysis offers no real advantages but some shortcomings compared to conservative treatment for disc protrusions, and to operative treatment in real disc prolapses, its justification seems more than questionable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.