A ReSPIRATORY disease outbreak was identified in a litter of American boxer dogs at a breeding kennel in Ontario, Canada. Three of the puppies died aged three weeks. Virus isolation was negative but Bordetella bronchiseptica and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were isolated from nasal and oropharyngeal samples. The MRSA isolate was spa-type t034, negative for Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes, non-typable by SmaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and sequence type (ST) 398. This clone of MRSA is usually associated with livestock. Typing of the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette determined it to be SCCmecV(nt). The role of MRSA in the death of the puppies was unclear. Because ST398 MRSA has been rarely reported in dogs, and because of the increasing evidence of the importance of ST398 as a zoonotic pathogen, an investigation was undertaken.The kennel consisted of 12 breeding animals (10 females and two males), four adult pet dogs and two pet cats. At the time of initial investigation, two litters of puppies were present, including the litter containing the puppies that died. Two other bitches were pregnant and due to deliver within the next two weeks. Because of the potential for direct transmission of MRSA between certain animals as well as direct transmission from human beings to animals or indirect transmission to animals, all animals were considered potentially exposed and were tested. Nasal and rectal swabs were collected from all animals (12 breeding dogs, four pet dogs, two pet cats and 12 puppies) 21 days after the deaths of the puppies. MRSA was isolated from 12 of 30 (40 per cent) animals ( Table 1): two of 12 (17 per cent) breeding animals (both periparturient bitches), three of four (75 per cent) surviving six-week old puppies from the affected litter, six of eight (75 per cent) three-week old puppies from the other litter, and a pet dog housed in the same pen as the first bitch. The other three dogs and two pet cats were negative for MRSA. household infection control practices were in place, particularly hand hygiene. Contact between colonised (MRSA-positive) dogs and other dogs and people was restricted. It was reported that one of the two people in the household worked on a pig farm. Because of the strong association between ST398 colonisation of human beings and contact with livestock, and the high rates of ST398 colonisation among pig farmers (Van Loo and others 2007), colonised people were considered a possible source of infection for the dogs.Testing was repeated 14 days later. Nasal and rectal samples were collected from 28 originally tested dogs (cats were not retested) and one new dog. Further, two bitches had whelped, and puppies from the two new litters (one of eight puppies and one of five) were also tested, giving a total of 42 dogs tested. In the interim, one of the colonised bitches had developed MRSA gangrenous mastitis and two of its puppies had developed severe MRSA pyoderma. MRSA was isolated from 12 of the 42 (29 per cent) dogs: eight of 25 (32 per cent) puppies ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.