Objective: To evaluate telephone advice given in an emergency department. Design: Prospective, observational study. Setting: A community‐based emergency department in a semi‐ruraVouter metropolitan setting, between August and November 1995. Participants: All people telephoning the emergency department for medical advice. Methods: Details of all calls, callers and patients were recorded. Within 72 hours, a follow‐up call was initiated seeking replies to a series of standardised questions. Main outcome measures: Number, timing and duration of calls; appropriateness of the advice given; compliance with the advice; and callers' satisfaction with the service. Results: Over the four‐month period, 1682 calls were received, 58% between 4pm and midnight. There were 33 telephone calls per 100 emergency department attendances. The mean call duration was 3.9 minutes (range, 0.25‐25 minutes); 49% of patients were less than 14 years old, and 72% of callers phoned because of spontaneous illness. The advice given was considered inappropriate in only 1.4% of calls. Follow‐up calls were made to 1132 people (67%), revealing a non‐compliance rate of only 6.9% and a high level of caller satisfaction, with 99% of callers affirming a need for such a service. Conclusions: The provision of telephone advice by emergency department staff is rated highly by the community and compliance with the advice is strong. Paediatric problems, arising as a result of spontaneous illness, predominate and there is a large bias towards after‐hours use of the service. Experienced staff provide better advice.
This paper demonstrates that the application of the MET model to the district general hospital improves the process of patient care. We are unable to conclude whether the MET alters morbidity or mortality for hospital inpatients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.