In view of uncertainty regarding the criteria and significance of gastric dysplasia as a precancerous lesion, members of the Pathology Panel of the International Study Group on Gastric Cancer (ISGGC) reviewed microslides of 93 gastric lesions showing varying degrees of mucosal abnormality, and reached the following consensus: (1) immature and proliferating gastric epithelium can be divided into two categories: hyperplastic and dysplastic; (2) the term dysplasia, especially of high‐grade type, should be restricted to precancerous lesions, and hyperplasia is applied to regenerative changes; (3) regenerative hyperplasia may be simple or atypical, but dysplasia includes both moderate and severe abnormalities, since they often coexist and can not be sharply separated; and (4) occasionally the possibility of malignancy can not be excluded in a severely dysplastic epithelium; in such a case rebiopsy and diligent follow‐up are necessary to establish the diagnosis. Criteria for diagnosing dysplasia and hyperplasia are presented and discussed. The opinions are offered as guidelines for establishing the diagnosis of gastric dysplasia and for prospective studies.
Confusion in the nomenclature of gastric polyps and the resulting uncertainties regarding prognosis and treatment have made a new classification necessary, consisting of focal hyperplasia, polyp of manifold aetiology, adenoma, and benign hyperplasiogenic polyp, the latter the most common one, found only in the stomach. But 110 cases of polypoid mucosal changes could not be classified. These "polyps" grow to be at most 8 mm in diameter and are characterized histologically by non-inflammatory cysts of varying size located within the intact fundal glands. Possible causes are hamartoma or functional secretory disorders. These glandular cysts have not previously been described. They do not fit the pattern of cystic gastritis. The clinical significance lies in the differentiation from gastric polyposis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.