No abstract

In mixed cocoa-coconut palm plantations in Malaysia the palm spadices provide large, stable nesting sites for Dolichoderus thoracicus (Smith) in contrast to impermanent sites on cocoa and on the ground. D. thoracicus and the arboreal leaf-nesting Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) both benefit from the mixed system which also provides a more stable food supply from honeydew-producing Homoptera. A scoring method showed that about 50–200 O. smaragdina or 200–2000 D. thoracicus on a cocoa tree can protect it effectively from Helopeltis theobromae Miller (Hemiptera: Miridae). The relatively greater efficiency of O. smaragdina as a biological control agent is associated with its actively dispersive predatory behaviour in contrast to the localized concentration of D. thoracicus workers at sites such as cocoa pods where it tends honeydew-producing Homoptera, and where it acts largely by deterring H. theobromae. Despite its biological control potential, the painfully biting O. smaragdina, unlike D. thoracicus, is normally considered unacceptable to plantation staff. Nevertheless it should be recognized as valuable in integrated pest management of cocoa pests especially where D. thoracicus is difficult to establish.

The rate of oocyte development in constant regimes corresponded to the rates predicted by Pritchard's (1970) relationship which indicates that the lower temperature threshold is 13.5dgC. Rates in fluctuating regimes indicated that development occurs at certain temperatures below the constant threshold if these are alternated with higher temperatures on a daily basis In certain fluctuating regimes, oocyte development occurred at a rate in excess of 3.5% per day and maturation proceeded to completion. In such regimes resorption occurred only if egg laying was prevented; when this happened the terminal oocytes usually remained intact and the penultimate ones were resorbed. In other fluctuating regimes, oocyte development proceeded at a rate of less than 3.5% per day and no maturation was achieved because the most advanced oocytes were resorbed‐either before or during the vitellogenic phase. The 3.5% threshold corresponds to a value of 2 day‐degrees per day (2DDPD) above 13.5d̀C. Resorption, but no development, was observed in partly mature flies around O DDPD, whereas neither occurred in a still colder regime. These results are shown to be in accord with Fletcher's (1975) field data which are also used to discuss the significance of resorption. Finally, the DDPD relationship is used to define those daily temperature profiles which may permit maturation in the field.

The observed mutualistic relationship between the black cocoa ant Dolichoderus thoracicus (Smith) and the mealybug Cataenococcus hispidus (Morrison) was examined. The importance of C. hispidus to D. thoracicus as a food source was investigated by giving D. thoracicus access to C. hispidus only, to C. hispidus and other food sources, and denying access to any obvious food sources. Dolichoderus thoracicus was seen to depend on C. hispidus alone as a source of food over an eight-week period of observation without showing ill effects. The role of D. thoracicus in spreading C. hispidus was studied in an experiment consisting of combinations of D. thoracicus and C. hispidus exclusion. It was shown that D. thoracicus was responsible for carrying C. hispidus across a ‘mealybug excluder’. Data on the frequency and duration of transport of C. hispidus by D. thoracicus were obtained by direct observation for a total of 90 h over 17 days. Both adults and nymphs of C. hispidus were carried by D. thoracicus with its mandibles in a brief and erratic manner, in the general direction of the trail. Such transportation is nevertheless considered to be important in view of the large number of individuals of D. thoracicus moving along a trail. The close mutualistic relationship between D. thoracicus and C. hispidus reiterates the necessity to manipulate both organisms for control of cocoa pests.