Management of a perforated duodenal ulcer is most commonly performed by laparoscopy and consists of suture of the perforation after performing lavage of the peritoneal cavity. In most cases, a flap is created, and an omental flap is usually the preferred choice because of its simplicity and its proximity to the site of duodenal perforation. However, in some cases, the greater omentum cannot be used due to the severity of peritonitis or due to previous surgical removal. We report a laparoscopic technique for surgical repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer using a round ligament flap. The present manuscript and the associated video highlight some important technical aspects to easily perform this procedure.
BACKGROUND:
Elective stoma closure is a common, standardized procedure in digestive surgery.
OBJECTIVE:
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of day-case surgery for elective stoma closure.
DESIGN:
This is a prospective, single-center, nonrandomized study of consecutive patients undergoing day-case elective stoma closure.
SETTING:
This study was performed at a French tertiary hospital between January 2016 and June 2018.
PATIENTS:
Elective stoma closure was performed by local incision with an ASA score of I, II, or stabilized III.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
The primary end point was the day-case surgery success rate in the overall population (all patients having undergone elective stoma closure) and in the per protocol population (patients not fulfilling any of the preoperative or perioperative exclusion criteria). The secondary end points (in the per protocol population) were the overall morbidity rate (according to the Clavien-Dindo classification), the major morbidity rate (Clavien score ≥3), and day-case surgery quality criteria (unplanned consultation, unplanned hospitalization, and unplanned reoperation).
RESULTS:
Between January 2016 and June 2018, 236 patients (the overall population; mean ± SD age: 54 ± 17; 120 men (51%)) underwent elective stoma closure. Fifty of these patients (21%) met all the inclusion criteria and constituted the per protocol population. The day-case surgery success rate was 17% (40 of 236 patients) in the overall population and 80% (40 of 50 patients) in the per protocol population. In the per protocol population, the overall morbidity rate was 30% and the major morbidity rate was 6%. Of the 40 patients with successful day-case surgery, the unplanned consultation rate and the unplanned hospitalization rate were both 32.5%. There were no unplanned reoperations.
LIMITATIONS:
This was a single-center study.
CONCLUSION:
In selected patients, day-case surgery for elective stoma closure is feasible and has acceptable complication and readmission rates. Day-case elective stoma closure can therefore be legitimately offered to selected patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B583.
RESULTADOS A CORTO PLAZO DEL CIERRE DE ESTOMA AMBULATORIO: UN ESTUDIO OBSERVACIONAL Y PROSPECTIVO
ANTECEDENTES:
El cierre electivo de un estoma es un procedimiento común y estandarizado en cirugía digestiva.
OBJETIVO:
Evaluar la viabilidad de la cirugía ambulatoria para el cierre electivo de estomas.
DISEÑO:
Un estudio prospectivo, unicéntrico, no aleatorizado de pacientes consecutivos sometidos a cierre de estoma electivo ambulatorio.
ESCENARIO:
Un hospital terciario francés entre enero de 2016 y junio de 2018.
PACIENTES:
Cierre electivo de estoma realizado por incisión local con una puntuación de la American Society of Anesthesiologists de I, II o III estabilizado.
PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:
El resultado principal fue la tasa de éxito de la cirugía ambulatoria en la población general (todos los pacientes habiendo sido sometidos a cierre de estoma electivo) y en la població...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.